Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Heat is Power. Let's Stop Throwing it Away!

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

23 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 23
July 24, 2008
This is an excellent article. It gets to the core issue of the how the convergence of inefficiency, waste, and primitive design of energy systems are artifacts of the industrial revolution founded on relatively cheap combustion energy fuels.

The unintended side effects of this wastefulness is at the center of the global crisis we now face. What if the answer to these problems is simply to change our industrial and technology-use habits. Will we be too stubborn or self-interested or mired in short-term thinking to take the steps to preserve the Earth, our only home?

Mr. Blakeslee has clearly identified a critical direction for rectifying the energy conundrum. Don't waste anything. Instead turn all energy streams into useful outputs according to their energy content.

Since it has already been so widely demonstrated, there should be no resistance to investment in these systems and technologies. In fact, no matter what non-combustion renewable energy technologies you favor, they all need backup, storage and distribution in order to provide the standard of living to which we have become accustomed.

So let's get the capitalists to get off the cheap trick bandwagon of investing in sound bites and products that are already commodities in order to flip their investments to the ignorant for unGodly profits. Let's focus the investments on practical integration of systems that yield real results instead of paper profits.

We are in an era where the control of the productive resources is in the hands of people whose sole motivation is short-term financial reward. Previously, the concept of product viability and utility (and therefore profitability) were thought to be the foundation of good investment strategies. We must get back to that sustainable approach to capital utilization. While it may be swell to be a Master of the Universe, unless investments yield beneficial results, then we may be on a slippery slope to chaos.
http://lightontheearth.blogspot.com
Comment
2 of 23
July 25, 2008
I am elderly aand have been handicapped all my life. and have thought for years we should be using wasrte heat. Let's build thease near cities where we can pipe it with the water system that is already in place.
Comment
3 of 23
July 25, 2008
I am elderly aand have been handicapped all my life. and have thought for years we should be using wasrte heat. Let's build thease near cities where we can pipe it with the water system that is already in place.
Comment
4 of 23
July 25, 2008
I am elderly aand have been handicapped all my life. and have thought for years we should be using wasrte heat. Let's build thease near cities where we can pipe it with the water system that is already in place.
Comment
5 of 23
July 25, 2008
To Bama Tecangel:
You wrote:
"Yeah, that kind of greenspeak will just turn on all the treehuggers and turn off the rest of us that care about solving real problems with real money. I see nothing wrong with capitalism. It dang sure beats all the other alternatives to an economic social structure."

That kind of response to my post is irrelevant. I am a capitalist. I have a Masters Degree in Business. I have also been personally utilizing and developing renewable energy systems that include cogeneration for 26 years. My perspective goes way beyond greenspeak to survivalspeak.
Comment
6 of 23
July 25, 2008
Don't buy an new car anymore. If you need one, buy a used one, ore an electric car, or an hydrogen car or an compressed air car. Save the world.
Comment
7 of 23
July 25, 2008
Great article!

As I think Mr. Blakeslee is aware, our company Cool Energy, Inc. is working on the small-scale distributed solar thermal sector of the CHP space, using evacuated tube collectors for the solar heat gain, and a Stirling engine for the power generation. There are multiple technical and practical reasons for this approach vs the Rankine cycle approach when the scale of the generation is small. Fundamentally, the system provides a building owner with a high solar fraction of space heating in the winter months, with power generation in the summer months. These systems (heating and electricity) are tied together with a controller that uses the heat in the most cost-effective way possible for the user. The target market for these systems are areas with high heating and electricity costs, such as the Northeast and mid-Atlantic regions, where system payback times are twice as fast as for other technologies.

We expect to be doing on-sun testing in Q2 2009, and the prototype engine is running in the lab.

http://www/coolenergyinc.com
Comment
8 of 23
July 25, 2008
In the past I have voiced criticisms about Mr. Blakeslee, mainly concerning what I perceive to be some carelessness in using numbers to prove his point. In all fairness, I must admit that this article is much better in this regard although there has been some SLIGHT increase in coal plant average thermal efficiencies since 1957 but not enough for me to quibble about. His main point is quite correct, we need to do something useful with the large amount of waste heat generated by power plants of all types.
Comment
9 of 23
July 25, 2008
My company has a high efficiency, heat source agnostic turbine (RET). It accept any heat source with sufficient btus: waste heat, solar thermal, Geothermal, on-board fossil fuel engines… It can be built in the U.S. The problem is not the technology, or cost – RET is a fraction of competition. The problem is the difficulty in getting to the decision makers. It is politics in its basest form, you are an outsider, stay outside. Ever try to speak to a significant party in one of Al-Gores organizations? Blakelee is correct that power plants have arcane regulations which economically favor inefficiencies. However, there are solutions (meaning recoup waste heat, profitably). The renewable/ efficiency experts are too conservative, behind the development curve, and politically protective. Unfortunately, this percolates to the top. For example Al Gore's 100% US electricity from renewable in 10 years – equates to achieving only 10% of the US energy need in 10 years. Does 10% in 10 years sound like a solution? My involvement shows that 100% of US energy needs (40TWH/yr) will be achieved in 10 or less years! There are too many trillions of dollar on the table. If Gore were properly advised, he would say 100% of US energy, but he did not get the correct fact sheets, analysis, or introductions. Foreign countries are making leaps the US is not, e.g., a 1 GW wind farms. Renewable energy companies are making too much money – to stop cranking out low efficiency quasi solutions. A solution, means energy costing MUCH less than fossil fuel. Energy solutions will relegate prior (still new) equipment to the legacy pile. Who wants to pay $.15/kWh, when you can get it for $.05/kWh or less? (and my company has at least 2). RENEWABLE Energy, unlike fossil fuel or nuclear is a zero sum game, thus a cut throat process. Ironically, while this process is cutting our throats, it is also destroying our lungs, and planet!
Comment
10 of 23
July 25, 2008
This is an excellent article.
Another area where the world is wasting energy is our modern electronics. All of our electronics - TVs, computers, microwaves, etc. have transformers converting line power to low voltage DC to operate. The transformers draw current even when the device is turned off and produce heat as the waste product. Our homes and offices should be wired with additional DC circuits to power our electronics directly without the extra transformers. One or two electronic AC to DC converters could be wired at your breaker panel and then distributed throughout the house using separate wiring and plugs/ recepticals. Our homes / offices would then be ready for direct DC from renewable sources such as solar PV.
Comment
11 of 23
July 25, 2008
Ummm...the author proposes to sell all that "wasted steam" from power plant boilers. You can't quite do that because the power plant needs that steam to be condensed back into water to re-enter the boilers. You can't give the power plant's water away, but you can give away the condensing heat if you keep the water cycle closed. This is sloppy terminology on the author's part.

What the author has right is our waste of waste heat. Consider that the geothermal energy industry is now buying special power generators to extract useful energy from water under 300F:

http://www.utcpower.com/fs/com/bin/fs_com_Page/0,11491,0167,00.html

These machines are basically traditional air conditioning chillers modified to run in reverse. UTC is the parent company of Carrier air conditioning...so here's a new use for a traditional product line.

I would have to think that these devices and other techniques can be applied, with the right incentives, to improve the efficiency of traditional thermal plants as well as large industrial processes with huge ovens, kilns, etc, and sources of waste heat.

It is interesting that the author brings up the nature of federal regulations that create perverse incentives to prevent plant improvements. This issue deserves a closer look. There's much talk about saving the world by having homeowners install PV panels on the roof, but the fact is that industry and gov use 93% of the electricty generated in this country. We have neglected the unglamorous value of improving industrial energy efficiency while badgering housewives to weatherstrip their patio doors.

In the past, the electric utility companies have encouraged much efficiency improvements with incentive programs for their large industrial customers, but these programs have now run out of gas economically. The gov should start heavily incentivizing industrial energy efficiency improvement and take up the intitiative where the utility company incentives leave off.
Comment
12 of 23
July 25, 2008
This is an excellent article that shows how our incentive systems are completely backwards. We need to put things in order by adopting the Green Tax Shift -- i.e. Tax Waste, Not Work.
The Green Tax Shift provides a triple dividend by encouraging conservation and less pollution, by stimulation our economy by un-taxing labor and capital, and by reducing the need for government regulation by harnessing the power of an authentic free market to provide the incentives for energy efficiency.

Tax what we burn, not what we earn.
Comment
13 of 23
July 25, 2008
Great article and definitely highlights the need for regulatory change.
Comment
14 of 23
July 25, 2008
To me this article points out the obvious improvment in technology. Sure cogeneration is more efficient, but it was not around when many power plants were built. All new construction will have this feature because it is more efficient.

Companies will retrofit where it makes financial sense. But sometimes, a new natural gas cogeneration plant (and decommission the old coal plant) makes more sense than trying to retrofit a 50 year old coal plant.

This is the benefit that Bama points out. Capitalism and profits are not evil. Profits forces companies to use the limited capital in the most efficient methods. Withouth profits there are no companies. Without companies, you don't need electricity since no one will make gadgets that use electricity.
Comment
15 of 23
July 25, 2008
"So let's get the capitalists to get off the cheap trick bandwagon of investing in sound bites and products that are already commodities in order to flip their investments to the ignorant for unGodly profits."...

Yeah, that kind of greenspeak will just turn on all the treehuggers and turn off the rest of us that care about solving real problems with real money. I see nothing wrong with capitalism. It dang sure beats all the other alternatives to an economic social structure.
Comment
16 of 23
July 25, 2008
I guess our downfall was the Rural Electrification Act which led to huge power plants and the public not having a sense of where the energy is coming from. Prior to the act, people were using solar, wind, and biomass to produce the energy they needed and had to "work" for it. Conservation and high efficiency were a must and innovation and creativity were abounding. Just look at some very old Popular Mechanics. Now we are trying to get back to independent power generation on the small scale where we left off in the 1930's. We now have 70 year's of catch up to do.
Comment
17 of 23
July 25, 2008
Reading about not wasting Heat is interesting, large Power Stations soon should be the old way. Due to line losses only 30% of energy is actually converted to produce Electricity. The rest is wasted power in transmission losses, and heat losses as anyone who has driven past a Power Station should know.

I am partner and Director of Bamford Energy Management Ltd
Trying to inform companies how to reduce their energy use with out really costing, a lot. Most surveys end up with a report, saying 1/3 energy does not need any spend, then little spend, then a major spend.

But except for what has to be spent to start with, soon saving energy reduces costs, and this covers what has being spent.

John Gregson 07796 533 460
Comment
18 of 23
July 25, 2008
CHP - whether using fossil fuels or biomass - makes so much sense. There's much more CHP-specific info on the website of one of REW's sister magazines - http://www.cospp.com/

Jackie Jones, Editor, REW magazine
Comment
19 of 23
The author is spot on in his analysis of our energy wasting. Because of the knee-jerk resistance to the ideas of conservation and efficiency I believe the best way to appeal to industry and "conservative" politicians is to focus on the benefits on the bottom line.
I remember as a child being told by my father that when I left the door open in the summer that dollar$ are flying out the door. Somehow that image has stayed with me, and I think if people were more aware of how much cheaper it is to save energy/money than it is to generate it, then expecting efficiency might become the norm.
Perhaps a yearly contest for energy saving ideas with a huge cash prize would be a way to capture the public's imagination...
Comment
20 of 23
July 26, 2008
I am at present living and working in Aktau, Kazakhstan. The whole city is provided with hot water from the local nuke power plant. In really hot summer weather there is no hot water. But plenty in the winter time, as a matter of fact you might not get any cold water.
Comment
21 of 23
July 27, 2008
Who's going to pay for it?
The American taxpayers?
Do you really want to save the planet Earth poeple?
Or are your just not "in love" with idea of saving it (us)?
You have to quit energy. Plain and simple, just say no to energy.
For well over 7,000 years, mankind thrived on the planet Earth with out these energies. It has only been in the last 100 year that we have begun to believe, that we cannot live without them.
Sure, people will die off in grate numbers if this is done cold turkey. So take 100 years to reverse it. Only 4.5 billion will die in that 100 years. The same number it has increased since this addiction to energy started 100 years ago.
That would be 45 million dead bodies a year on average. Hey would could burn the bodies to produce energy while we ween ourselves off of energy. There are some really fat people out there that could produce a lot of energy.
Hey! your the ones addictted to energy, not me.
Comment
22 of 23
July 28, 2008
T. Schmidt is not addictted to energy unless it involves using the energy hog servers that power the internet so he can post his comments. OR the energy consuming sewer system to flush away his STUFF.
So please pratice what you preach and cut yourself from the grid, and buy an out house...do forget the shovel...
Comment
23 of 23
February 10, 2009
If anyone can give me information about how,with minor redisign,an air conditioner ca be converted to a waste heat generator that will convert heat to electricity ,please do it ( small ORC generators)
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Thomas Blakeslee

View Thomas Blakeslee's Profile
About: Thomas R Blakeslee’s books have been published in nine different languages. After serving for three years in the U.S. Navy, he earned a degree from CalTech in P... more »

Advertise With Us

Solar FlexRack National Solar Trainers Southwest Windpower Das Haus: Innovation in Renewables and Energy Efficiency AWS Truepower, LLC Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. HelioSage
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters