The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

SOS: Schools on Solar

Preston Roper, Tioga Energy
May 08, 2008  |  10 Comments

There is an SOS coming from communities across the nation: Save Our Schools. With the rise of new financing tools like power purchase agreements (PPAs)and the right support from the public and politicians, I believe we have an answer: Schools On Solar.

Schools nationwide are in dire fiscal straits and have been forced to make hard financial decisions to stay afloat — usually by shutting down an increasingly comprehensive list of classes, skimping on materials and shutting down operations. In California, the nation's greatest solar state, Gov. Schwarzenegger has proposed cutting at least $4 billion in overall education spending to help restore the budget deficit. Across the nation in the Sunshine State, Florida lawmakers are struggling to avoid cutting $357 million from the education budget — after losing $468 million in funding last year.

I believe that solar power options like PPAs can recharge our ailing schools and not only save them money, but also help plan regular, measured payments that put resources and financial support back into schools' hands.

Traditionally, implementing solar systems at educational facilities presents a laundry list of problems: many public schools don't have the available resources to make use of capital budgets, can't gain the support for bond measures including solar systems or can't run a buying process on existing staffing and budgets in order to purchase and maintain a solar installation. RFP management, architectural design and proper evaluation of alternative energy paths are time-consuming and expensive, making it difficult to go solar. The costs and efforts of system maintenance and monitoring — combined with uncertainty around system generation — further complicate the process.

These contributing factors all cause administrators and facility managers to be initially cautious and slow to move on investments like solar energy. But we have found that these same administrators are financially creative people who understand the financial benefits of solar. And they want to see progress. Their bottom line is often that solar companies have to deliver more than an environmentally-friendly project. They have to be financially sound and save the district money from day one.

Enter PPAs.

PPAs can help schools precisely predict what their power costs can be — through fixed cost energy pricing — so they can better gage spending that might otherwise go to increased electricity costs.

They also enable schools to capitalize on credits and incentives, specifically the solar Investment Tax Credit. Under the proper utility tariff and utilizing the available tax and rebate incentives, PPA providers can offer schools a rate of power that's competitive with existing utility rates. Meanwhile, PPA providers handle the outsourcing of contractors and financing, removing extra labor on their behalf.

New options like PPAs make for a strong start. But we believe that such advanced products alone won't be enough to start turning the tide towards energy independence for our schools. That's why we also need a political stimulus to kick-start schools on their way to renewable energy adoption.

Already, we've seen solar resonate in candidates' energy platforms, along with its importance to growing security and energy-savings in the public sector. For example, both Hillary Clinton's and Barack Obama's energy platforms call for more stringent government leadership in these areas.

Clinton has called for a "Green Building Fund" to infuse $1 billion into energy efficiency for public buildings like schools. In addition, she's calling on schools to stand up as exemplars in their community through a platform of Individual Responsibility, asking them to reduce emissions in their communities and will propose a set of Department of Energy awards to recognize the most outstanding climate achievers.

Likewise, Obama has taken a strong position in calling for federal efficiency grants to help build more efficient schools that conform to green building certifications.

With pressure stepping up of from Silicon Valley renewable energy companies, who continue supporting federal tax credits for local and state clean energy projects, its clear that a combination of the right financial and product tools, and the right political pressure for energy solutions, can help stimulate this sector, and our future, and realize the enormous opportunity in using new paths to solar to save our schools.

Preston Roper is executive vice president, corporate development and operations at Tioga Energy.  Roper was recently senior vice president of marketing and sales at Bitpass. Previously he was VP Marketing at business intelligence provider JasperSoft, as well as vice president of marketing at Tesaria, a provider of mobile commerce solutions. Prior to completing his Masters of Business Administration at Stanford University, he led business development and fund-raising for the University in Germany, where he also became fluent in German. Roper holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering and a Master of Science degree in hardware-software co-design from Stanford University.

10 Comments

Register To Comment
robert bernal
robert bernal
May 23, 2008
I know I'm posting (way) late, but what about the posibilities of free energy after the (high) costs are recuped. Rooftop companies shall soon offer PV upfront? I'm glad to spend the few extra pennies just for the hope of lowered PV costs through competition. And what about CPV/thermal where thirty some percent is converted directly, and another 30% could be converted to steam (later for storage?). I agree that schools should spend the little extra for solar in general according to the level of education. 6th graders can help assemble panels whilst colledge students could do the more advanced stuff associated with CPV and/or CSP.
George Messier
George Messier
May 17, 2008
Solar on schools financed under PPAs is a winning formula.
It offers Distributed Generation with wholesale-cost, large-scale PV arrays installed on public buildings having a life cycle more closely matched to the technology. The broader public realizes a benefit, in contrast to small-scale, retail-priced residential applications benefitting only the homeowner.

Look beyond "subsidies". We subsidize roads, railroads, airports, port facilities, agriculture and sports stadiums. States and municipalities offer tax incentives to lure big business. I read something once (more often actually) about "promoting the general welfare".....

In a similar vein, NREL offers an interesting pdf document aout groundsource heat pumps for public schools, already in use in hundreds of schools nationwide. Think about all those playing fields and expansive lawns which can be put to good use in providing low-cost heat and cooling.

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/pdfs/26161a.pdf
Ben Gatti
Ben Gatti
May 12, 2008
David,
You have mischaracterized Eugene's comments, and by extension my own, M. Gorman's, and the "many" in your opening.

Clearly, Eugene is not opposed to Solar Thermal due to its cost effectiveness. I think you'll find that people who post here are generally interested in this subject. Your "assumption" that Eugene is ignorant of the many subsidies for various energies is completely unfounded.

It is precisely BECAUSE of the costs of energy, environmental, political, and other, that our government should spent OUR money in the most cost-effective manner. How that money breaks down is really besides the point. There is a limited amount of money we, as a society can pool together for solving common problems.

Residential PV, in my studied opinion, does nothing to solve any common problem. At best, it is the most expensive way to mitigate energy consumption - the least expensive is foam.

Moreover, there is no future for residential PV - as you say it is small now, but if it were scaled up - it would be very very expensive, and these costs would be borne regressively.

Regressive is probably too big a word for you - because you haven't addressed the complaint. Regressive means poor people get stuck with more of the costs than rich people.

So here again - as Residential PV is scaled up to 50%, that 50% would be the richer half, the poorer half would then be the only ones still "paying" for the grid - the costs of which will not have dropped by 50%.

Explain that before you criticize Eugene - if you can...
Benjamin Gorman
Benjamin Gorman
May 10, 2008
I agree with Ben Gatti that dollars will be far more effectively spent elsewhere than PV for schools. PV will absolutely be the right thing, even for schools, once other, lower-cost, higher-efficiency avenues have been pursued first. Solar thermal is vastly more efficient and lower-cost and may make good sense for schools for their hot water use as well as for supplemental air heating. But before implementation of technology, conservation should always be the starting point. We seem, as a nation, almost pathologically resistant to conservation because of its undeserved (and inaccurate) association with dearth--- Americans don't like to cut back; we're all about limitless abundance.

Further, we believe that technology will save us from any and all problems, especially energy and climate issues, rather than examination and change of our energy use habits. This tendency makes solar PV seem like a good idea where in fact it is (presently, at least) the least cost-effective, least efficient solution possible. Yes, it's sexy, yes, it's marvelous technology; it's simply not the place to START addressing energy cost or savings problems; it's the LAST step to take in a transition that should begin with reduction and efficiency efforts.
David Koon
David Koon
May 10, 2008
like many people, Eugene has a problem with paying the pennies for pv development because it is done out front, but ignores the REAL costs of other energies. We subsidize oil and gas, coal and nuclear to the tune of billions, both directly with tax breaks but in an even greater amount by allowing the public to pay the real costs of environmental damage, health costs, etc. Subsidizing exponential growth based on finite resources is a fools game. In any test tube situation, including this big one we call Earth, things always look ok right up till the population collapse that results from using up energy/food/resources.
Robert Whitson
Robert Whitson
May 9, 2008
Great article Preston - you make a couple great points. Additionally, MA, CT, and a few other states have public benefits funds that actively support DG on public schools/buildings.

PV is likely the best form of DG on a majority of U.S. schools, because most schools don't have the resource potential to support the "Least Cost RE," but almost all schools have some sort of solar resource. Even if it is more expensive now, PV presents the best way to give students a new aesthetic on their campuses while promoting tactile learning and interaction.

Much like SolSolution, EduSolar (edusolar.org - website is currently under development) is also looking to provide PV at no or low-cost to educational institutions while promoting educational curriculum building activities. We'd also be interested in speaking with you, Preston, about our plans and any potential for cross-pollination of ideas on such initiatives.

- Robert Whitson
EUGENE Lucas
EUGENE Lucas
May 9, 2008
Today's photovoltaic solar energy is a loser. It only exists because taxpayers and utility ratepayers, who don't use it, have to pay part of the costs for those who do. It's actually a hidden tax, which I don't like paying. Let the PV solar folks get the price of their product down to where it competes directly with power off the grid, and everyone will buy it. But, please, keep your hand out of my pocket.

However, solar-thermal energy used directly to heat and cool schools and other large buildings could indeed be cost-effective right now, and solve a lot of other problems too.
Fred Widicus
Fred Widicus
May 9, 2008
Eugene,
You seem to be complaining about economic hardship that PV supports are causing you.
Perhaps you could quantify the amount of $ solar energy PV) has cost you in the past year?
Exactly how much has been pulled out of your "pocket"?
I submit to you that money that has been extracted from citizens by force is no more that a couple hundred pennies a month in states with the highest solar supports. Hope you can survive the hardship.
Ben Gatti
Ben Gatti
May 8, 2008
Schools have infrastructure constraints which make them suitable for only the single most expensive form of RE. When you say PPA and School in the same breath - you are throwing out Tidal energy, Geothermal energy, Wind, Wave and CSP energy. If we took the same view for subsidizing mass transit - we would be arguing for Helicopter-a-teacher-to-work as if this would encourage the adoption of city trams.

PV is so expensive that every dime we spend on it, only takes nine cents away from solving our energy challenges. We have the first city powered 100% by Wind. Do we have the first city powered by PV? Make the case that such a city could exist. Make the case that every class of citizen in a typical city can afford their electricity in an All PV scenario.

Ok then, until then I think we should focus on Least Cost RE, and discourage the wasteful spending of a limited energy budget on foolhearty proposals. Until PV is a least cost energy - those in support of it - should encourage research into lowering the cost - tax support for production should be spent where it produces the most energy - and PV isn't there yet.

Ben
Soren Harrison
Soren Harrison
May 8, 2008
SolSolution (www.sol-solution.org) is looking to just what you're talking about, Mr. Roper. We'd love to talk more with you about our plans.

Soren Harrison

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 11
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 10
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • SolarReviews
  • AltE
  • American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE)
  • Quickscrews International Corp.
  • 3TIER
  • Solar Energy International (SEI)
  • AllEarth Renewables
  • SolarFlairLighting.com
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information