The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Monday, May 20, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Organic Photovoltaics: the Good, the Bad, and the Inefficient

Joe Kwiatkowski, Physicist, Imperial College London
May 19, 2008  |  10 Comments

What if making a solar cell was as easy as printing a newspaper? What if it was flexible, light and above all, cheap? The current photovoltaic (PV) market, dominated by expensive and fragile silicon, would be revolutionized. These are the lofty ambitions of a growing number of scientists in companies and universities worldwide who are developing organic photovoltaics: solar cells that are made from carbon-based molecules.

Successful large scale commercialization of solar energy depends on three criteria in particular: efficiency, lifetime and cost. Much of the early excitement in organic photovoltaics arose from expectations that they could be very cheap. First, the chemicals industry already manufactures organic molecules by the kiloton and sells them cheap. Second, making an organic solar cell is wonderfully slapdash when compared to the care needed in making a silicon solar cell. However, efficiency and lifetime remain stubborn thorns in the side of advocates of organic photovoltaics: efficiencies waiver around 5% and ironically, although reasonably stable in the dark, organic materials tend to degrade in the light.

Both the advantages and the shortcomings of organic photovoltaics can be understood in terms of their material properties. Whereas the building block of other solar cells like silicon is the atom, the building block of organic cells is the molecule (a collection of atoms into well-defined groups). This fundamental difference has far-reaching implications for the performance of organic solar cells.

Because molecules are larger than atoms, they are easier to work with. For example, by dissolving them in a solvent they can be turned into an ink that can then be printed in much the same way as a newspaper. As evidenced the daily press, printing is cheap and fast; the area of print produced every day for a typical newspaper is on the same order of magnitude as the area of all the solar cells produced every year from a large polysilicon plant.

Not only are the molecules easier to handle than atoms, it is also easy make new designs with molecules. Whereas it is difficult to build an entirely new material when starting from atoms, almost anything can be built when starting from molecules. Indeed, the number of molecules that could potentially be used in an organic cell are limited only by the imagination of the synthetic chemist. This means that organic solar cells could be customized for a particular application or market. Massachusetts-based Konarka, for example, can manufacture cells with different color schemes including cells that are camouflaged for their military customers. More importantly, researchers hope that by careful design and with repeated tweaks, molecules can be developed that will satisfy all three criteria necessary for a successful solar cell: efficiency, lifetime and cost.

One benefit of the huge molecular portfolio available to organic photovoltaics is the ability to choose molecules that absorb sunlight very efficiently. As a result organic solar cells can be made 1000 times thinner than silicon solar cells, thereby offering huge savings on materials. Furthermore, because they are thin, the cells are also flexible and could be printed on a roll-to-roll process, transported easily and simply unrolled on the customer's roof. Konarka, amongst others, is also developing cells that can be incorporated into tents or clothes.

Another advantage of moving from atoms to molecules, is that it opens photovoltaics to entirely new industries. For example, powerful chemical companies such as BASF, Merck, and Dow have recently realized that the large scale manufacture of organic solar cells could provide an enormous market for their products. To encourage the development of organic photovoltaics and to ensure their place in any future markets, these companies have devoted substantial manpower and funds to photovoltaics research.

Whilst organic photovoltaics may have cost advantages and whilst they may open up a range of other exciting possibilities, they also have shortcomings. To efficiently extract electricity from a solar cell, electrical charges need to be able to travel through it quickly. If charges move slowly they are likely to become stuck or recombine with other charges (of opposite polarity) and disappear altogether. As a result, the number of electrical charges available to do useful work, such as recharging a battery, is diminished. It is not hard to get charges out of a silicon solar cell because its atoms are neatly arranged into crystals and and so charges can fly between them at enormous speeds. However, molecules are less ordered, particularly when printed, and so charges move much more slowly between them. To further compound the problem molecules hold onto a charge very tightly and are reluctant to pass it on to their neighbors. Because electricity can't flow easily, the efficiency of an organic solar cell is limited.

Sadly, it's not only a problem of getting electrical charges out of an organic solar cell: it's also a problem of generating them. When a solar cell absorbs sunlight it gains energy but, being uncomfortable in this state, it attempts to discharge that energy. Ideally it does so by generating two charges but alternatively it may simply throw the energy away as heat. Solar cells are designed to favor the former process: silicon cells consist of two doped regions that attract positive and negative charges, and organic cells attempt the same effect using two different types of molecule. However, whilst the process is very efficient in silicon, it is less so in organic cells.

Whilst poor generation and extraction of electrical charges limits the efficiency of organic photovoltaics, a further problem is lifetime. If you take the care to build a material from atoms, it will generally last a fairly long time. In comparison, molecules are fickle entities that will react with other molecules such as oxygen and water. In doing so, they change. They might absorb less light, or generate fewer charges, or actually trap charges and prevent them from being collected. It is an unfortunate, but ironic, fact that molecules are more likely degrade in this way whilst illuminated.

As with any new technology, there are many high hurdles to be cleared before a finished product can be sold. However, the excitement growing worldwide is testament to the potentials of organic photovoltaics; a coalition of the German government, BASF, Bosh, and others recently announced an organic photovoltaics research program to the tune of US $570 million. Maybe organic photovoltaics are a long way from competing directly with silicon; however, they would open niche markets and, with such serious backing, it would be surprising if somebody didn't make money from molecules at some point.

Joe Kwiatkowski is a physicist at Imperial College London, where he works on organic photovoltaics.  His current interest is the development of computational methods that can aid the design and optimization of new photovoltaic materials.

10 Comments

Register To Comment
Valério Igor Victorino
Valério Igor Victorino
February 5, 2009
I live in Brazil and I think this new technology will be promise for isolated and poor communities. I agree with Roberto Petracca, if the organic materials tend to degrade in the light, ironically, by other side it is cheap and could be easy to change.
Developing countries need public policies promoting incentives in order to faster the development of this new technologies.
Richard Woodham
Richard Woodham
June 20, 2008
I worked for BP Research on photovolatics over 20 years ago. Hearing that a new dawn is imminent makes me feel very nostalgic.
Producing photovoltaic structures using low energy processes which don't when exposed to sunlight, rain etc. is really, really tough.
The key parameter is the energy pay-back time - how long before you generate more energy than you invested in the manufacture.
Roberto Petracca
Roberto Petracca
May 24, 2008
Excellent.
If making an organic solar cell is going to be as easy as printing a newspaper we can plan to change solar cells every morning like we do with true newspapers. That way doesn't matter if the organic solar cells are quickly degraded by the light or by the oxygen; they don't need to "survive" more than one day.
Can we have something lasting one week? A weekly duty is more attactive than a daily one. Better if we can reactivate the solar panel every week with a simple passage of sugar or silicone spray. Thay way we lower the burden of recycling.
I'm not kidding. Just to say that the technology seems to me to be promising.
Bernhard Scheffler
Bernhard Scheffler
May 21, 2008
An excellent introduction to the topic.

I have successfully used some polymer materials in large solar pool and aquaculture heating systems. The first, constructed in 1979, was recently still in operation.

A question to Joe Kwiatkowski:-- Would fluoropolymers (such as super-clear ETFE film, of which the transparent roofs of many buildings -- including the Bank of England & the Olympic Swimming stadium in Beijing -- are made) be suitable for photovoltaics?

They have excellent long term resistance against degradation by light -- including UV. Also to degradation by temperatures up to & well beyond 100°C.
Bernhard Scheffler
Bernhard Scheffler
May 21, 2008
Of course, ETFE & PTFE (and many other commonly used poymers) are electrical insulators. They have very few unsaturated (multiple or conjugated multiple) bonds -- typically one bond in a thousand to one in a million is a double bond.

Would their conducting "cousins" (if any exist or may be engineered) also share their excellent resistance against degradation by light & heat?
Jon Bohmer
Jon Bohmer
May 21, 2008
ETFE is used as a top layer for thin film PV. Teflon is used as the bottom insulator for silicon cells. I am sure such fluoropolymers will serve to protect organic PV from the environment as well. One issue: ETFE transmits UV-A and UV-B light (but not UV-C) which might do harm to some of the organic molecules.
Ronald Wagner
Ronald Wagner
May 21, 2008
It seems that it might be better, in hot climates, to collect the heat and turn it into electricity. I am thinking Stirling engines and other new technologies such as Eneco's chip. Water, antifreeze, and liquid salt can be mediums and storage.
William Lynch
William Lynch
May 21, 2008
A good article for the layman. Perhaps the dominant sentence is "molecules are fickle entities that will react with other molecules such as oxygen and water." It is not directly stated that these molecules consist of multiple low-energy bonds that are easily disrupted by light and the disruption can be permanent. Silicon in a crystal has bands and the band that is capable of being "excited" has a large energy gap relative to those weak bonds in organic materials. Large sputtering systems for "spraying" silicon that can be treated to form controllable "polycrystalline silicon" is an approach with an intermediate expense and an intermediate efficiency. These layers can also be very thin. The problem has been manufacturing yield.
Thomas J. Setter
Thomas J. Setter
May 21, 2008
Thanks for the information. I agree commercial application is not far away.
I live in "The Valley of The Sun" and we need more Solar here.
Arizona State University has started to work on this.
hakkan kosan
hakkan kosan
May 21, 2008
Thanks.Very informative and rased my hopes on this subject....hopefully in very near future...

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 11
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 10
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • EnergyDreams LLC
  • PLANSEE SE
  • Conergy Inc.
  • SolarInsure, Inc.
  • The Interstate Renewable Energy Council, Inc.
  • Tigo Energy
  • AR Power Company, Ltd.
  • Enecsys
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information