Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Getting More for Less: The Growing Role of Negawatts

By Glenn Croston, Author
May 5, 2008   |   15 Comments

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

15 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 15
May 6, 2008
A Negawatt

A negawatt is a megawatt saved,
A negawatt is the path to be paved,
Energy efficiency is what we strive to be,
For negawatt savings are real.

A negawatt is power not used,
And none of us should be excused,
From keeping on the switches, wasting power in glitches,
Running of electrons is abused.

Leaving lights on when they are not needed,
Disconnects on microwavs not heeded,
We keep in the power plug and it turns into a slug,
By draining power which from the grid is feeded.

Negawatts are megawatts to save,
The negawatt should be the path to crave,
Energy efficiency is what we strive to be,
Yes, negawatt savings are real.

adrianakau2aol.com
Comment
2 of 15
May 7, 2008
Exactly Dennis. We are submitting a capital request for a project that is projected to save 2.43 million kwh/year. At our current rate of $0.10/kwh this has a straight payback in less than 2 years.

A fully justifiable project on its own but an EPACT tax credit it is still available. Another example of while subsidies have good intentions, they just don't work.
Comment
3 of 15
May 7, 2008
Sorry about the implied dig.

My point is that many energy investments stand on their own with reasonable ROI. Conservation measures are usually a good place for a business to put excess cash. Waiting for bureaucratic approval and support before proceeding is a cost in time and money that transfers some of that return to non-productive participants. So Why Bother?
Comment
4 of 15
May 7, 2008
Thanks Dennis (i think)
Well, Green Tags are going to develop new RE generating technologies. It is going to incentivize entrepreneurs to delve into lower ROI generating clean energy businesses. It gives us a way to purchase renewable energy inexpensively without putting it on sight, which is expensive.

White tags just give more money to the utilities for doing what they should have been doing for years. Should we have propped up Betamax when they were getting crushed by VHS?
Comment
5 of 15
May 7, 2008
Hey Jihad:
Can someone tell me who will pay for these white tags?
You will.
Can I sell them for eternity?
As long as you keep buying.

Green Tags - White Tags Why Bother?

"If we are the owner of a building in PA and we saved 10 mWh a year by putting in a new HVAC,"

You save $1500-2000 per year for 15 years, at todays electric rates.
You get a new, reliable HVAC system with improved indoor air quality for your employees or tenants.
You get to depreciate the asset over time.
Comment
6 of 15
May 7, 2008
Hey Shawn: I prefer comments not advertising;)
This question is for the Glenn Croston:
If we are the owner of a building in PA and we saved 10 mWh a year by putting in a new HVAC, do these "white tags" last a year or 5 years? Can I sell them for eternity?
Comment
7 of 15
May 7, 2008
Conservation is the key! How about "negagals" for efficient cars and trucks? I'd be happy to sell my White Tags to some "gas hog" owner; and a lot more people would buy more efficient cars in the future.
Comment
8 of 15
May 7, 2008
A simple example of the real value of efficiency improvements available now at fairly low cost.
Modern IGBT's can reliably switch more than 1000Amps at 2400Volts at 10KHz



MEGAWATTS ( May2008 Mid-Columbia, on-peak spot $98.10 / MwHr)

Solar PV at 45 degrees latitude
Approximately 1.4 annual MegaWatt Hours per nameplate KW
Example: 50KW(solar array) X 1.4 = @ 72 MwHr / year
Cost: @ $7.50 / watt installed 7.5 X 50000 = $ 375000
Thirty year life 72 X 30 = 2160 MwHr lifetime production
$375000 / 2160 = $173 / Mega Watt Hour produced

NEGAWATTS

Adjustable speed drive on 40 HP fan motor 8000 hours per year runtime
Approximately 35KW(motor load) X 8000 = 280 MwHr / year
If drive saves 25% then 280 X .25 = 70 MwHr / year
Cost @ $10000 for drive and high efficiency motor, installed
Ten year life 70 X 10 = 700 MwHr lifetime saving
$10000 / 700 = $14 / Nega Watt Hour saved
Comment
9 of 15
May 7, 2008
The development of the the high power capacity IGBT(isolated gate bipolar transistor) has created a booming, global "Negawatt" industry. It is difficult to see since it is installed in industrial locations. Certainly not as sexy as solar or wind, but potentially more valuable to the environment than either.
Adjustable speed drives (ASD) for electric motors are similar to solar PV inverters with a rectifier input section. Electric motors consume more than 50% of the electricity produced, globally. For certain fan and pump loads an ASD can reduce energy consumption by 25-40% without productivity loss. ASD's are already a mainstream technology with a diverse and competitive manufacturing and installation marketplace.
There are some home applications in HVAC and water pumping but the greatest potential is in commercial and industrial applications. Payback without utility subsidies can be 1-2 years through power savings alone.
Comment
10 of 15
May 7, 2008
I am all for efficiencies, but are these negawatts merely one more way for Utilities to continue business as usual? I think that our energy infrastructure has been hijacked by the large fossil fuel burning utilities and they don't want to change. So, what do these utilities do? They lobby their states to pass a negawatt program so they won't lose money for implementing efficiencies. Is it not one more way to create a revenue stream for a monopoly? Who is going to buy the IBM efficiency they put in their data center? I won't. Isn't that what free markets are for? Can someone tell me who will pay for these white tags?
Comment
11 of 15
I agree that energy saving is our largest energy source, even in Germany where I come from. I love the term "negawatts", never had heard of it before. However, I believe White Tags make things only more complicated, creating bureaucracy not really needed, if things are also possible without such means. It sounds just like CDM and emission trading to me... This might be a good idea, but if the result (after years) is really a good thing, is still to be proven.
The idea of EnerNOC sounds much better to me. It is simpler and thereby also cheaper.
But the best and simplest idea I know is still a fair price to energy, if possible even including the external costs, which in reality means we are internalizing them again! Energy-intensive industry might need some help. But if the rising prices are announced well in advance - like done with the eco-tax done in Germany - everybody can plan and adapt, since the knowledge for energy efficiency is around, whether you need to change your personal habits or apply better technology. You only need to do it! Or can you seriously tell your grandchildren, you "just could not do any better" than what in their future eyes will definitly be "wasting energy"?
Comment
12 of 15
May 8, 2008
Well I see the volutary market as a way to vote with your dollars and in turn acquire additional revenue streams. If we all were to buy RECs, then we are creating additional capital. Its already happening. Any new large scale RE project now factors in RECs as an additional way to make money, shorten the payback period and increase ROI. Its a new marketplace full of ideas. I just wonder if the utilities have hijacked certain marketplaces.
Comment
13 of 15
May 9, 2008
Amen brother. You have got a witness.
If reclaimable waste heat were to be included in those figure they would double.
Some large hydrualic systems, for example, have fluid to air heat exchangers that have the potential to release enough heat during a production shift to air condition the office space during that shift by way of the amonia adsorption principle. Instead that hot air is just being released into the enviroment.
I been in production plants (steel buildings) that utilize several gas heaters suspended from the roof members that overheat the space up high, while the employees are wearing jackets. I believe half the gas would be consumed if, infloor radiant hydronic heating were utilized. Even less if waste heat from the paint bake rooms and large air compressors were reclaimed.
I could go on and on all day with examples such as this but unfortunately, space here is limited.
Obviously the big question is, "who is going to pay for it?"
The government? If thats the case the you should be saying, "the taxpayers." This is one of my biggest beefs with the renewable energies industry. Nearly every article I read about RE includes something about needing more funding from the government, excuse me, the taxpayers!
Comment
14 of 15
May 9, 2008
I gave up on the article as soon as I read "In 1989, Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute coined the term "negawatts" for conserved energy, defining a negawatt as one megawatt of electricity conserved for one hour."

If the people in 1989 were already useing the terms watts and watt-hours interchangeably then I understand why few today seem to grasp such a simple concept.

What a waste of pixles.
Comment
15 of 15
May 12, 2008
Composite Technology a small Ca. company produces a product called composite core this core is designed to replace the steel core in electric transmission cables. The composite core is smaller yet stronger then steel and therefore can carry 28% more aluminum conductor wire in the same dimension of cable as traditional cable.

Think of it like a water pipe and think of the electric utility like a pumping station, well the pump doesn't have to run as long with a larger pipe then it does with the traditional smaller core/pipe. This product uses the same tools and method for installation as traditional cable does now and can save up to 50% of a utility's power generation capacity. The composite core has already had years of testing and is a proven product with over 1200 thousand miles of installations already.


http://www.compositetechcorp.com/
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Blue Sky Energy, Inc. LORD Corporation Via Expo Intertek Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. Brightergy Solar FlexRack
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters