The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Sunday, May 26, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Sandia and Stirling Set Solar-to-grid Conversion Efficiency Record


February 19, 2008  |  20 Comments

On a perfect New Mexico winter day -- with the sky almost 10 percent brighter than usual -- Sandia National Laboratories and Stirling Energy Systems (SES) set a new solar-to-grid system conversion efficiency record by achieving a 31.25 percent net efficiency rate. The old 1984 record of 29.4 percent was toppled Jan. 31 on SES's "Serial #3" solar dish Stirling system at Sandia's National Solar Thermal Test Facility.

The conversion efficiency is calculated by measuring the net energy delivered to the grid and dividing it by the solar energy hitting the dish mirrors. Auxiliary loads, such as water pumps, computers and tracking motors, are accounted for in the net power measurement.

"Gaining two whole points of conversion efficiency in this type of system is phenomenal," says Bruce Osborn, SES president and CEO. "This is a significant advancement that takes our dish engine systems well beyond the capacities of any other solar dish collectors and one step closer to commercializing an affordable system."

Serial #3 was erected in May 2005 as part of a prototype six-dish model power plant at the Sandia Solar Thermal Test Facility that produces up to 150 kilowatts (kW) of grid-ready electrical power during the day. Each dish unit consists of 82 mirrors formed in a dish shape to focus the light to an intense beam.

The solar dish generates electricity by focusing the sun's rays onto a receiver, which transmits the heat energy to a Stirling engine. The engine is a sealed system filled with hydrogen. As the gas heats and cools, its pressure rises and falls. The change in pressure drives the pistons inside the engine, producing mechanical power, which in turn drives a generator and makes electricity.

Lead Sandia project engineer Chuck Andraka says that several technical advancements to the systems made jointly by SES and Sandia led to the record-breaking solar-to-grid conversion efficiency. SES owns the dishes and all the hardware. Sandia, a National Nuclear Security Administration laboratory, provides technical and analytical support to SES in a relationship that dates back more than 10 years.

Andraka says the first and probably most important advancement was improved optics. The Stirling dishes are made with a low iron glass with a silver backing that make them highly reflective — focusing as much as 94 percent of the incident sunlight to the engine package, where prior efforts reflected about 91 percent. The mirror facets, patented by Sandia and Paneltec Corp. of Lafayette, CO, are highly accurate and have minimal imperfections in shape.

Both improvements allow for the loss-control aperture to be reduced to seven inches in diameter — meaning light is highly concentrated as it enters the receiver.

Other advancements to the solar dish-engine system that helped Sandia and SES beat the energy conversion record were a new, more effective radiator that also costs less to build and a new high-efficiency generator.

While all the enhancements led to a better system, one aspect made it happen on a beautiful New Mexico winter day — the weather.

"It was a ‘perfect storm' of sorts," Andraka says. "We set the record on Jan. 31, a very cold and extremely bright day, a day eight percent brighter than normal."

The temperature, which hovered around freezing, allowed the cold portion of the engine to operate at about 23°C, and the brightness means more energy was produced while most parasitic loads and losses are constant. The test ran for two and a half hours, and a 60-minute running average was used to evaluate the power and efficiency data, in order to eliminate transient effects. During the testing phase, the system produced 26.75 kW net electrical power.

Osborn says that SES is working to commercialize the record-performing system and has signed power purchase agreements with Southern California Edison (SCE) and San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) for up to 1,750 megawatts (MW) of power, representing the world's two largest solar power contracts. Collectively, these contracts require up to 70,000 solar dish engine units.

"This exciting record shows that using these dishes will be a cost-effective and environmentally friendly way of producing power," Osborn says. "SES is actively engaged in the commercialization of the system, called the ‘SunCatcher,' including continuing to prepare it for mass production, completing project site development and preconstruction activities, and establishing partnerships with substantial manufacturing and industrial organizations to develop a cost-effective manufacturing process and supply chain. The demonstrated high efficiency means more energy is generated for the given investment, lowering the cost of the energy delivered."

20 Comments

Register To Comment
dave aronson
dave aronson
March 2, 2008
I believe we should give Sandia and  SES credit for achiving what no one else has. We must applaud those whose researsh exceed the previous marks.
Ram Kandula
Ram Kandula
February 23, 2008
SES doesn't publish price from starting, when i called the reception was rude. She told they supply only to government and BIG power plants.

InfiniaCorp looks like for rest of us.

Their stirling dish engine costs 20,000 a piece for 3.5 kw system

http://www.infiniacorp.com/main.php

 

They raised 50 million $ recently. 

http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/11/clean-energy-startup-infinia-raises-50-million-to-crank-up-manufacturing

 

Can anyone calculate the economies of 20 grand a peice for 3.5 kwh system?

 

Thanks,

Ram


Jesse Hunter
Jesse Hunter
February 21, 2008
Another question to look at is the emboddied energy-how much energy do you get of the technology for each unit you put in. I've seen PV range from 10:1 to 2:1. Even if PV is 2 out for 1 in, that means it should be sustainable. Perhaps the sterling system is better. I'd love to see the calcs.

Regarding renewables as funtioning as the grid, see the clip of a pilot program of a green combination power plant in Germany.

http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/7/21139/94466
Jesse Hunter
Jesse Hunter
February 21, 2008
Another question to look at is the embodied energy-how much energy do you get of the technology for each unit you put in. I've seen PV range from 10:1 to 2:1. Even if PV is 2 out for 1 in, that means it should be sustainable. Perhaps the Stirling system is better. I'd love to see the calcs.

Regarding renewables as functioning as the grid, see the clip of a pilot program of a green combination power plant in Germany.

http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/7/21139/94466
Demetri Wagner
Demetri Wagner
February 21, 2008

I can answer the question about cost of the SES system. I'm the first shareholder in SES in 1996. As I remember costs are contingent on mass production. SES is working diligently on lining up its supply chain and is very close to mass production. Targets are 10's of thousands units per year or 2500 MW per year. They need these rates of production to meet demand for current and new power supply agreements they are bidding on. They expect to meet these rates by 2010/12. At these production rates target installed SES dish is less then $25k each or under $1 per installed kilowatt. That beats any solar device I know of.

As to maintenance for the SES system, yes its a cost but a small one. Dishes are designed to be self cleaning and will require a wash about once a year. Engine maintenance is needed only every 100,000 on-sun hours. This has been proven by a Sandia sponsored reliability program.

 

Demetri


Demetri Wagner
Demetri Wagner
February 21, 2008

Whats most exciting about the SES "Sun Catcher's" is target cost per kilowatt hour is less then the MPR(market price reference) for a gas fired power plant.

Remember SES is twice as efficient as PV and three times as efficient as CIGS and that means 1/2 to 1/3 the equipment, the cost and the land needed as compared to PV or CIGS. Add to that land prep is minimal as compared to PV, trough or power tower.

Demetri


Jay Rosenberg
Jay Rosenberg
February 21, 2008
We have a high efficiency Stirling (over 90% theoretical efficiency) that coupled with cost effective dishes (and a high solar thermal location) can generate provides carbon-free power at a projected $.05/kWh. Jriam1945@aol.com. We are looking for serious stakeholders in Solar Thermal and Geothermal. Jay
william hughes
william hughes
February 21, 2008

To John Groweg....  Another interesting heat storage medium is one of the eutetic salts.  Glaubers salt which is sodium sulphate decahydrate comes to mind.  The decahydrate is the key.  At around 30 degrees, it turn liquid and absorbs 'latent heat' just as melting ice does.  Of course it gives out this large amount of heat when it "freezes" also around 30 degrees.

I'd like to see how this system would perform at the south pole in the middle of summer.  The coldness of the cold side is critical to the efficiency of a heat engine, the altitude of the south pole gets it above much of the atmosphere and since it is a focusing system, the mirrors are at 90 degrees to the suns rays anyway. 

 


Michael Halpin
Michael Halpin
February 20, 2008

A "stirling" effort Sandia the news keeps getting better, another good use for hydrogen!

Mike H. HYDROGENHEADS


Jean Vincent
Jean Vincent
February 20, 2008

Unfortunatly SES does not disclose the cost of a dish system. About a year ago, I had made an estimate of $75000 per 25KW dish or $3 per KW. I don't remember how I came to this number though so don't quote me.

This cost is still way too high for mass replacement of other poluting technologies.

The real key is not efficiency, it is the cost per KW. This probably means that this is not the most efficient system that wins but of course it's probably one of the most efficient systems.


Jean Vincent
Jean Vincent
February 20, 2008

We still have to solve cost-effectively the energy storage problem for nights and bad wheather.

For the night, I came up with this idea (I don't know if someone else had this idea yet) that the world could build tropical ring grids around the world so that countries in the sun would distribute energy to countries in the dark in a rotating fashion.

We also need to consume less energy at night through better insulation and other measures to use more energy during the day (the oposite of what electrical companies try to do today because they can't reduce energy production at night very easilly).


Jean Vincent
Jean Vincent
February 20, 2008
An advantage I see of the dish systems is that they allow local, low-scale (25KW units) production. Of course this probably increases maintainance costs but this could help with aging grids, local capacity increases, bringing more flexibility and probably could be more resilient to grid disasters.
Matthew Homola
Matthew Homola
February 20, 2008
Transferring electricity to the opposite side of the world is probably not going to be a reasonable solution. Combinations of solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, etc together with pumped hydro, compressed air storage and more means there will always be power available, just that it will be more expensive at some times than at others. Heat storage at a home is one way to manage load balancing, by being able to heat the storage tank when power is cheap (sunny, windy, rainy) and use the heat when power is more expensive. This is already in use in some areas to take advantage of off-peak rates. Large numbers of grid connected car batteries may also play a role.
Muir Matteson
Muir Matteson
February 20, 2008

In the comparison between photovoltaic panels and active systems such as SES, a couple of theings to consider are the amount of maintenance and the availability of the land to be used simultaneously for something else.  An SES system will need constant maintenance, with its many moving parts and finicky requirements. The constant use of service vehicles would have a large impact on the land, rendering it nearly useless for anything besides power generation.  Photovoltaic panels, on the other hand, can be mostly left alone.  The land would still be available for wild animals and plants, or for grazing or even for growing crops.  If I were to bet, I'd put my money on photovoltaics. 


Robert Paynter
Robert Paynter
February 20, 2008

What's the cost? Along with others, that's my main question.

On energy storage, I think people are looking too far - the current systems follow demand, surely if variable cost electricity (to the consumer) is available then there will be a huge amount of consumption that will be willing to follow supply.  Obvious examples are big energy users like HVAC, washing machines even some food preparation activities.  As long as there is (electronic) access to the current price systems can be set to run when price is low.  The capacity of good demand control, with minimal hardware (switches) far outstrips the inefficiences and expense of electrical storage.

One advantage of solar is that it produces in the daytime when activity is highest.


James Brown
James Brown
February 20, 2008

Cost per kWhr is an important measure. To achieve a sustainable future this probably will need to increase. This provides economic drivers for the rapid changes that are needed to move from fossil hydrocarbon sources.

The link between coal oil and ecomomic growth is because these were the energy production technologies of the last few hundred years.  Replacing this obsolete technology will provide the energy supply required to maintain an effective modern economy.

Energy costs as a proportion of GDP are presently 2% to 5%, but have been falling consistently for 50 years.  A doubling of delivered (not the at power station or well head) energy costs could be easily accomodated.  It won't decrease but increase employment and GDP. The changes are just another sectoral shift in the development of the economy. Newer technology and efficiency improvements driven by higher energy costs will then allow energy intensity to continue its downward trend.


Geoff Steele
Geoff Steele
February 20, 2008
Continued 'competition' for innovative ways to solve energy production needs in the post-petroleum environment is healthy.  Solar power is just one area.  I continue to be encouraged by growing dialog supporting greater R&D of geothermal resources worldwide.  It's a natural, non-polluting source of energy with international potential.  It's also a natural for horizontal integration by leading oil companies, with their huge investment in drilling and pipeline technology that's directly applicable to geothermal development.  Futures planners at BP, Shell, etc. should definitely be turning a gaze toward expanded geothermal R&D in potentially productive areas of the world.
Dan Ost
Dan Ost
February 19, 2008
It's about time we heard something about SES. After all the hype a while ago, I stopped seeing news about them. I was afraid that it had turned out to be a scam or hoax.
dursun sakarya
dursun sakarya
February 19, 2008
I'll skeptical. Efficiency is not the driving factor when the "fuel" is free. The only factor efficiency drives is how big a plot of land you need.  $131,000 in PV panels would match this system in power. What does this system cost?
William Fitch
William Fitch
February 19, 2008
Hi: Well, that is definitely a good question. I would like to know the cost of this system and the projected cost with some economies to scale in place…

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Texas Legislature Passes Commercial and Industrial PACE Bill
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • AltE
  • AR Power Company, Ltd.
  • CleanEnergyAuthority.com
  • Enphase Energy
  • EU PVSEC (European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition)
  • Unirac, Inc.
  • HelioSage
  • Demand Energy
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information