Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Clean Energy: Recovery vs. Addiction

By Brian F. Keane, President, SmartPower
February 11, 2008   |   25 Comments

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

25 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 25
February 11, 2008
Even in cases where I fully agree with someone's position, I always find precision with details to be important.

I believe, though certainly would be eager to hear if you can provide examples to the contrary, that Bush and his administration usually use the term that we are "addicted to foreign oil". The distinction is probably quite important, as that term is merely a call for exploiting North American resources... a new drug dealer, not entering rehab.
Comment
2 of 25
February 11, 2008
Despite what GWB said, he and his oil cronies want the U.S. to remain addicted to oil. A more meaningful Bushism is "the American way of life in not negotiable", and that's why we're fighting for oil.
Comment
3 of 25
February 12, 2008
<p>Clearly it's all about addiction.</p><p><a href="http://greyfalcon.net/coskata" target="_blank">&nbsp;http://greyfalcon.net/coskata</a>&nbsp;</p>
Comment
4 of 25
February 12, 2008
<p>Mr. Keane - could you please provide some statistics supporting your claim that &quot;the U.S. creates enough clean energy to power every home in 11 states.&quot;&nbsp;</p><p>What eleven states are you referring to, and how much electricity are they consuming?&nbsp; Perhaps you could compare your stats with the following information:</p><p>The Energy Information Administration(EIA) website calculated these for 2005: </p><p>a) US Net Summer Capacity was <strong>978,020 MW </strong></p><p>b) US Electricity Net Generation from Renewable Energy was <strong>365,253,632 MWhr</strong></p><p><strong>270,321,254 MWhr </strong>of that latter amount (a.k.a. about 2/3) comes in the form of conventional <strong>hydroelectric.</strong></p><p><strong>550,294MWhr </strong>is <strong>Solar.</strong></p><p><strong>17,810,549</strong> MWhr is <strong>Wind.</strong></p>
Comment
5 of 25
February 13, 2008
american society has become sick,complacent and arrogant,you have no idea how much potential for good your country has lying dormant,translate the philosophys of your founding fathers into a global incentive for change rather than souless consumerism and we might get out of this mess yet.&nbsp;
Comment
6 of 25
February 13, 2008
<p>Correction to msg #11:&nbsp;</p><p>Make that CCS - carbon capture &amp; sequestration.&nbsp; Sorry.</p>
Comment
7 of 25
February 13, 2008
<p>When the New York Times and Scientific American in the same week present articles that declare biofuels are a greenhouse threat, are bad for feeding people and for combating climate change any thinking person should take heed and start questioning the junk science surrounding the biofuels mythology. Also there is a strong indication may be entering a cooling period. Check it out. </p><p>http://ibdeditorial.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=287279412587175<br /> The Sun Also Sets<br /> By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Thursday, February 07, 2008 4:20 PM PT<br /> <br /> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/08/science/earth/08wbiofuels.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin<br /> Biofuels Deemed a Greenhouse Threat By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL February 8, 2008<br /> <br /> http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=biofuels-bad-for-people-and-climate<br /> February 7, 2008 Biofuels Are Bad for Feeding People and Combating Climate Change<br /> &nbsp;</p>
Comment
8 of 25
February 13, 2008
<p>Part deux:&nbsp; The dilemma is further compounded because corn ethanol is a loser, both in terms of ERoEI, and impacts on food supply.&nbsp;&nbsp;Biofuel similarly suspect.&nbsp; Worse yet,&nbsp;precious forest is being cleared worldwide to satisfy yet another appetite - biofuel feedstocks.&nbsp;&nbsp;And while everyone talks about cellulosic ethanol - it doesn't exist outside the lab.&nbsp; </p><p>Efficiency and conservation remain paramount.&nbsp;&nbsp;Then add mass transit, large-scale PV and wind,&nbsp;and shift transportation load to the grid via plug-in hybrids, pending a long-term solution.&nbsp; Keep nuclear on line, and expand it.&nbsp; We're stuck with safeguarding the waste for millenia; another 50-100 years of production hardly matters.&nbsp; Press forward with CSS.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
Comment
9 of 25
February 13, 2008
<p>Congratulations&nbsp;to Brian Keane &amp; SmartPower.&nbsp; That said - so far it's been easy.&nbsp; </p><p>Much of the enthusiasm&nbsp;for RE stems from high fossil energy prices.&nbsp; Environmentailsts&nbsp;have stymied&nbsp;development of any energy projects&nbsp;not to their liking.&nbsp; Rising energy prices - classic supply &amp; demand - makes RE look competitive.&nbsp;&nbsp;But neither wind nor solar is &quot;dispatchable.&quot;&nbsp; The reality remains that all the RE on line today is &quot;covered&quot; not by other&nbsp;RE, but by&nbsp;fossil/nuclear generators -&nbsp;also on-line, and able to ramp up their generation when the wind stops,&nbsp;or the clouds roll in.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p>Now,&nbsp;NIMBY has spawned&nbsp;BANANA - Build Absolutely&nbsp;Nothing Anywhere Near Anything.&nbsp;&nbsp;Opposition to Cape Wind is the logical outgtrowth of their success.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
Comment
10 of 25
February 13, 2008
America is very lucky that the conversion to renewable energy is bottom up rather than top down.&nbsp; If past history is any indication, a pure top down approach (think the USSR) is inefficient and ineffective in the extreme.&nbsp; If nothing else, a bottom up approach involves many many more heads working to solve the problems and then just like biological evolution, the best solutions being chosen, spreading through the market and then further improved in another round of innovation.&nbsp; Don't knock it.&nbsp; Glory in America's Number 8 wire approach (a Kiwiism).
Comment
11 of 25
February 13, 2008
I'm afraid that this article ignores our great use of energy. There isn't enough land to grow our way out of the use of oil for mobile power, and even worse - there's not enough water. We are trading food for fuel, and water for fuel, both of which are wrong. Just to desalinate the water increase needed by Sourthern California would require more than 3500 turbines, or 100 square miles of solar-thermal troughs, at a cost of from 7 to 20 billion - for the turbines or troughs. The only real solution to our mobile energy problem is oil shale technology, which, unfortunately is not a renewable.
Comment
12 of 25
February 13, 2008
<p>&nbsp;</p><p class="MsoNormal">Brian-I agree with your theme, and would also love a breakdown of your statistics.&nbsp; You are correct in saying we need to look to the new candidates for future solutions.&nbsp; Like a drug addict, the current administration cannot go from denial- blocking out entire sections of climate change reports- to recovery, let alone vanguard leadership, overnight.&nbsp; Hopefully during 2008, as we wait for new leadership (all the leading candidates espouse tackling climate change) the states will continue to develop and test policy models, which can be evaluated to form a basis for a real national political dialogue in the &quot;new&rdquo; Washington climate of 2009 and beyond.&nbsp; We can certainly hope.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>
Comment
13 of 25
February 13, 2008
<p>Not that I agree with everything Bush does on renewable energy (especially recent opposition to PTC), but why turn RE into another political us vs. them?&nbsp; There is a lot of good stuff happening: </p><p>- Since 2000, biofuels are booming.&nbsp; Ethanol production capacity started growing an order of magnitude higher than 1999 since early in this administration.&nbsp; Biodiesel production growth is measured in triple digit % growth.&nbsp; Midwest (often R) politicians and renewable fuel standards in both the 2005 and 2007 energy bills have helped. </p><p>- US has moved to #1 in the world in new wind installations for the last 3 years, and solar PV installations are growing 30-50% annually.&nbsp; Both industries (especially utility-scale wind) are sold out.</p><p>- The White House got solar panels in 2002.</p><p>- Crawford Ranch (1999) uses solar heating and geothermal.</p><p>- Texas (1999) was the first successful RPS and is now #1 in wind.&nbsp;</p>
Comment
14 of 25
February 13, 2008
<p>What Bush says and what Bush does are strangers: President Bush mouthed off platitudes in the public arena for no other reason than to fool America into believing he has his finger on the energy pulse while all along it rests on his wallet which is being filled from his massive foreign oil investments:</p><p>We can only wait and hope that a future president will be more honest and put America ahead of personal considerations: America really must get a solid grip on renewable energy and soon:</p>
Comment
15 of 25
February 14, 2008
<p>Mr Rose:&nbsp; Thank you for that &quot;left-handed&quot; vote of confidence, and your&nbsp;gracious, generous thoughts.&nbsp; As Churchill noted: Americans can be counted on to do the right thing, after they've tried everything else.&quot;&nbsp; </p><p>As a nation, we have no doubt at times fallen short&nbsp;of the potential conferred by our political heritage, and inheritance.&nbsp;&nbsp;You and your own countrymen are free at any time to step into the breach, and take the helm.&nbsp; &nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
Comment
16 of 25
February 15, 2008
Hey guys, you are very lucky to have president Bush and his administration in the White House.&nbsp; He is the boogy man everyone loves to hate, to push against to rail against.&nbsp; Imagine if you had a real enthusiast for renewables in power.&nbsp; You would all sit on your hands and wait for central government to do something.&nbsp; As it is America is getting on with it at all sorts of levels from individual families to individual states.
Comment
17 of 25
February 15, 2008
<p>&nbsp;There is only one true answer to replacing gasoline and JP4 - that is hydrogen. the current course that is being followed (EtOH and Biofiuels) are both already proving to be disasters, and actually worse that il itself.</p><p>&nbsp;The sooner that the government gets this fact the better.</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
Comment
18 of 25
February 15, 2008
<p>Mr. Elliott:&nbsp;&nbsp;FYI, a &quot;left-handed&quot; compliment has absolutely nothing to do with political orientation.&nbsp; Rather, it has to do with irony and/or lack of sincerity.&nbsp; I share your disdain for political correctness.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>Re efficiency and conservation, see&nbsp;my comments at #11 above.&nbsp; We agree: it makes no sense to install&nbsp;PV when energy usage &quot;inside the box&quot; is so wasteful.&nbsp; In this regard, Europeans are ahead of us because high energy prices there have provided the necessary impetus.&nbsp; Our wasteful habits stem in part from a time when, courtesy of nuclear energy, electricity was going to be &quot;too cheap to meter...&quot;&nbsp; A labor-intense program to improve&nbsp;household energy conservation (improved&nbsp;insulation, windows, and mechanicals) is vastly more useful than PV on the rooftop.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
Comment
19 of 25
February 15, 2008
George your correct. Churchill did say &quot; American's can be counted on to do the right thing,after they've tried everything else&quot;. I think what Mr Rose was referring to was the fact that America has yet to even try doing the wrong things. Time and time again, as I do internet searches of products that would be a perfect fit for my Net Zero Energy designs, I find they are either produced in Europe or are used in Europe,and in no way available in the US. Our pathetic attempts at &quot;solving&quot; our energy problems using renewables is insane. We throw away far more energy daily,than we can be expected to produce. Help change this MR ETHNOCENTRIC and perhaps Mr Rose will have little to be critical about. Oh! The left-right thing is soooo old.Let's all go down in flames as we wave our 'flag of choice&quot; shall we.
Comment
20 of 25
February 16, 2008
There are more people in the world who do not like Bush than who do. I just wonder why this guy is so self centered? Why does he think he is always right? He wants to have America stop it's addiction to Oil, yet he is making a fortune doing it. He wants to stop American addiction to Oil so he invades Iraq? How is <span style="cursor: hand; border-bottom: #0066cc 1px dashed" class="yshortcuts">Iraq</span> going to make money if it doesn't sell its oil to the USA? I will always try to avoid and never talk to him. I think that will save me a lot of energy. I wish Presidents were like light bulbs, that way we can unscrew them if we want better light, or a better bulb. Whoever invented 2 term Presidents must have been a Pollock! Nothing against Polish people please.
Comment
21 of 25
February 16, 2008
<p>I think we need all the ideas for creating energy. I like hybrid, I like biofuels, I like hydrogen, I like geosolarwind&amp;tidal. I like coal and carbon capture and Algae Oil. I like magnetics. I like the MaglevTrains, and the Maglev Cars. I even like the Maglev OGV's (Ocean Going Vessels) that follow an electric track strung across the ocean from China to the USA and back.</p><p>I don't like Nuclear, or Depleted Uranium, I don't like Oil, and I don't like gasoline. I don't like a few rich people, I like many. I don't like the military, and I don't like Republicans. I don't like Obama because he won't Impeach.I don't like killing people, and I don't like Bush.</p>
Comment
22 of 25
February 16, 2008
<p>I think one man can make a difference and turn us off oil. </p><p>Ron Paul 2008!</p>
Comment
23 of 25
February 17, 2008
<p>&quot;why is nothing being done to help us break this addiction?&quot;</p><p>Lets see</p><p>1. Google &quot;Bush family Prince Bandar bin Sultan&quot;</p><p>2.&nbsp; Cheney: Halliburton</p><p>3. Andy Card Bush's Chief of Staff: Auto industy lobbyist &amp; GM exec.</p><p>4. Condoleezza Rice: Board of Directors Chevron Corporation </p>
Comment
24 of 25
February 23, 2008
<p>Actually, while it's not politically correct to many THIS White House has probably done more than any other to advance alternative energy.&nbsp; From solar to wind to biofuels (they're REALLY BIG on biofuels) they've pumped money into all kinds of areas of the industry.&nbsp; Wind is booming across the country.</p><p>What apparently many alternative energy advocates get mad about is that nobody is doing the &quot;Manhattan Project Crash Course&quot;--which is the only thing that would apparently make them happy (and even then they'd probably complain about something). &nbsp;</p><p>The fact is that the country is moving this direction, working more or less exactly the way a capitalist free market works, and that's the most efficient way to get the job done. My new house will be 100% wind-powered, for example, and there are lots of folks at work looking at adding solar.&nbsp; This is happening, guys--don't get all sour just because it's slower than you'd do it.&nbsp;</p>
Comment
25 of 25
May 31, 2008
President Bush offered the United States a modest menu of energy, health and education proposals and warned against the "false comfort of isolationism" in a State of the Union address on Tuesday that sought to reassert his control over the nation's agenda heading into a pivotal midterm election campaign.

In one of his most striking declarations, Mr. Bush said that "America is addicted to oil" and set a goal of replacing 75 percent of the nation's Mideast oil imports by 2025 with ethanol and other energy sources.

suhas rao
Comprehensive resources for those looking for recovery from addiction.

http://www.addictionrecovery.net
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Unirac, Inc. Valentin Software, Inc - providing Solar Design Software Delta Rigging & Tools Magnum Energy Inc. American Solar Energy Society RussTech Language Services, Inc. Sol Systems LLC
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters