Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

A Snapshot of the U.S. Wind Industry

By Daniel M. Kammen, Green-Biz
December 19, 2007   |   16 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
16 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 16
December 21, 2007
I agree with Edwin, because he is stating politcal fact. If you have followed alternative energy for a long time, you will realize that nothing has been done by politicians in any big way since Jimmy Carter, and much of what he did was disliked and ineffective.
Sure, sometimes things happen, but not often. Hilary's voting record on alternative fuels isn't so great.

Campaigns get people elected, money funds campaigns. Where is the money going to come from? How do you repay 30 million $$ worth of contributions? In whatever way the contributors tell you to. If you don't, you and your political cronies will be written off as welshers.

My only disagreement with Edwin is on Ethanol. There are a large number of ethanol producers who are not conglomerates or Ag Lobby hogs. Sadly, as long as the propagandists and PR spinners keep pointing the Ag hogs out, ethanol will be maligned.
Comment
2 of 16
December 21, 2007
I believe nameplate capacity refers to the maximum design capacity of the wind turbine. For instance, the Vestas V90 (?) is a 3 Megawatt nameplate capacity wind turbine. However, it doesn't always produce a full 3 megawatts under operation, depending on a variety of factors (siting, actual wind speeds, demand, etc). The same applies to other power plants, e.g. gas turbines, which may not be operated at full nameplate capacity due to other factors (demand, cost of natural gas, maintenance considerations, etc). However, these factors are more under the control of the operating entity for a fossil fueled plant since they can choose to burn more fuel when more power is needed.

Long term, wind power has a large advantage in that the fuel is free forever. Only maintenance and lease costs are left. With design improvements, wind turbine efficiency can improve which will reduce long term costs.
Comment
3 of 16
December 21, 2007
Paul,
You are repeating the dogma about free markets that has been hammered into our heads over the past 30 years. Fortunately or unfortunately, the building of major infrastructure on a timely basis almost always requires the help of the government in some form. In the last 25 years of free market dogma, our infrastructure has aged substantially, meanwhile the more dynamic economies of Asia have no problem calling in the government to help get infrastructure built. It's true Daniel points out that wind can get built now at times with a purely economic calculation...of course the now de-funded ITC and PTC have been big helps. Still, building an entire renewable energy infrastructure in a timely manner will need policies that favor renewables over fossil sources.
Comment
4 of 16
December 21, 2007
Sorry for the ignorance but what is "nameplate capacity"
Comment
5 of 16
December 21, 2007
Politics is about money. A shocking revelation.

Big oil has been there and is not goiong away.
Big coal has been there and is not going away.
Big Ag has been there and is very excited about ethanol and they are not going away.

There is no Big Renewables yet.
As important as the technology side is, it will get no where in Washington without Big Money even if the Dems win.

Unfortunately Renewables tend to "fight" one another for attention. Solar wants a tax credit. Wind wants a tax credit. Ethanol wants a tax credit (Big Ag). Geothermal wants a tax credit (supported by Big Construction). Etc. Then the government confuses the populace by using "Alternatives" which includes liquified/gasafied coal, etc.

We are making progress, but change in Washington is difficult. Remember, Germany, Spain, Denmark are the size of our States and have no oil or oil companies, and much more centralized governments. It is a different playing field.

Keep up the efforts.
Comment
6 of 16
December 21, 2007
I support all of this. I dont understand why this administration almost unilaterally opposes any kind of environmental legislation.
Comment
7 of 16
December 21, 2007
What an excellent article. This is information that definitely needs to be put out there as a neutral asssessment of the economics of wind power. In response to the first comment, I offer the opinion that feed-in tariffs are not in themselves superior to the mixed bag of state renewable portfolio standards and federal tax benefits. The principle characteristic of German and Spanish policy that sets them apart from the U.S. is consistency and predictability over the long term.

I would very much like to see a long-term extension of the federal PTC, as well as provisions to make it more accessible for community projects, but lacking that, state RPS mandates have done an admirable job in providing a certain amount of stability to the industry. Certainly, a stronger national stance would be ideal, but as indicated by another prior comment, we may be able to get some movement on that once the political situation changes in Washington.
Comment
8 of 16
December 21, 2007
Feed in Tarriffs are not necessary, "wind energy is now often directly cost competitive with fossil-fuel generation, and at times is a least-cost supply option".

Prices have risen because growth is so rapid that manufacturing capacity cannot keep up. Wind power generation will continue to grow rapidly without the government screwing it up.
Comment
9 of 16
December 21, 2007
This is great news for the class 5 sites. We need class 3 and 4 sites to be developed. We also have to support the smaller sites and projects. So congress should make it a level playing field. Re-enact the PTC or eliminate all the substities for oil, natural gas, and coal. I believe wind will win on a level playing field.
Comment
10 of 16
December 21, 2007
I am proposing a nationwide high speed train network. To drive the trains, renewable energy should play the major role.

Wind power is one of the most promising source. So demand for wind power id enormous. So US manufacturers should build their production lines to prepare for the network.

The network will become essential part of national security when oil is gone sometime in the middle of this century.
Comment
11 of 16
December 21, 2007
WE need to contact our representives and senators and urge them to extend the Production Tax Credit for wind energy. This issue will be discussed next year in the House/Senate.
Comment
12 of 16
December 21, 2007
Once ol' Georgey boy is history and the US Senate grows up is my guess!

Tom
Comment
13 of 16
December 21, 2007
encouraging news but when will the USA get its act together on feed in tariffs?
Comment
14 of 16
December 24, 2007
Timely topic. One of the issues in the article has to do with manufacturing of windmills in the US. The windmill industry has been subject to numerous starts and stops in the last 30 years (the most recent stop was when Bush allowed credits to expire in 2001). In Germany and Spain, it took a commitment by the federal government, something that Bush and the oil lobbies have refused. There would be many ways to accomplish this, one idea would be for the US to add, say 20 to 40% funding on any windfarm for the next 10 years in exchange for a like amount of electricity as long the windfarm is producing (I wonder how much the US government spends a year on electricity??). Most windmills have a payoff period of 7 to 10 years with somewhere between 20 to 30 year useful service life. The commitment is critical for the manufacturing to ramp up and for prices to come down.
Comment
15 of 16
December 29, 2007
This article is Proof that the feed in tariffs are not needed for Wind - its just a welfare give away.

Wind is being produced at less than $.07 per kwh and is competive or cheaper than other forms of energy.

Then Why does it need a welfare check/ feed in tariffs like in Europe?

The answer is simple. Wind doesn't need the tariff.
Comment
16 of 16
December 31, 2007
Does anyone know the name of the LBL study that Mr. Kamen refers to at the beginning of the article? Where can I get a copy?
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

FRONIUS USA LLC  Solar Electronics Division Latin American Wind Energy Association (LAWEA) Idaho Department of Commerce ESI Inc. of Tennessee Solar Energy International (SEI) Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc. Solar Power International 2012
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters