The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Sunday, May 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Wind Power Helps Texas Move Past Oil

Graham Jesmer, Staff Writer
November 28, 2007  |  30 Comments

Texas, long the traditional home of the oil industry in the U.S. has begun to make its presence felt in the renewable energy market as well. In 2007, more than one gigawatt of wind energy capacity has been installed in Texas and the state now accounts for nearly 30% of the nation's wind production.

Because of its geographic location, Texas is an ideal location for wind and other renewable energy production. Texas Secretary of State Phil Wilson highlighted the important contribution Texas can make in the renewable energy market in his keynote address at the Texas Renewables '07 Conference.

Wilson said Texas has the potential to produce 400 times the amount of energy the state uses each year through renewables, and that as a result, wind and other renewable energy sources can help bring prosperity to the state.

"With the cost of producing renewable energy decreasing, it is becoming a more viable and profitable option each year," Wilson stated. "Through advancements in technology and the utilization of renewable energy, we will begin to see an even larger financial advantage when it comes to alternative fuels and our economy."

Texas is a state that is friendly to business and to the energy industry. The state was a net exporter of energy for most of the 20th century, but in the mid 1990's, it found itself becoming a net importer. This worried many in the state's government but it also created an opportunity.

Mike Sloan, Managing Consultant of The Wind Coalition said that, "Texas' competitive energy markets and business-friendly environment have enabled the wind industry to deliver results that help customers and help the environment more quickly in Texas than in any other state."

According to Dr. Andy Swift, Director of the Wind Science and Engineering Center at Texas Tech University, Texas' energy producing past made the state more easily adaptable to the renewable energy industry. He also points to oil industry as another reason wind power in Texas has succeeded. The work force that had been involved in the oil industry is perfectly suited to be used for wind production with minimal retraining.

"Wind is accepted by people in Texas more than other places. The land use issues and aesthetic issues that are causing problems in the Northeast, they exist here also but people are more used to that here," he said.

A recent American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) assessment found that Texas has the capacity to produce 1200 billion kWh of wind energy per year. That's three times the amount of wind energy currently consumed in the state. And as plans to produce still more wind energy in Texas are made, so to are plans that take advantage of the Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZ) to export some of that energy to neighboring states.

These zones, designated by The Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) are areas that have been deemed most wind power capable. The goal of the CREZ system is to run transmission lines to these areas before wind farms are built so they are operational as soon as possible. These areas include McCamey in Uptown County, Abilene and Sweetwater, and the Panhandle.

The Panhandle, according to Swift, is ideally situated to export Texas Wind Power because of its proximity to other states and the fact that it sits on the plain. "There will be a transmission plan to move energy from the panhandle to the Southwest Power Grid," he said.

These plans have also made the international energy community take notice of Texas.

"The international wind industry is responding to the welcome mat set out by Texas, particularly the State's commitment to build transmission lines to support new development in the best wind areas," said Sloan.

Texas remains a large oil producing state but renewables are making an impact. Recently Texas-based utility TXU Energy scrapped plans to build eight coal-fired plants in favor of cleaner options. Wind and other renewables represent a transition for the state of Texas, a fact that is not lost on Secretary Wilson.

"For years I have been involved in the economic development activities throughout Texas," said Wilson. "I am excited for the new opportunities we are discovering for our state in the renewable energy sector. As a state, we recognize the importance of promoting and supporting the researchers, businesses and individuals who are pursuing these activities and believe that by working together, we can achieve a brighter, cleaner and more stable future for us all."

30 Comments

Register To Comment
Randy Erickson
Randy Erickson
April 7, 2008
I look at wind power for many of the solutions we are looking for as a nation.
1. Coal is expensive to mine, and it contributes to global warming. Also, watch out for mercury content, when it coal burns.

2. Oil is hap-hazard at best. If it's Tuesday, the price goes up. If an oil company shuts down a refinery for maintenance, the price goes up. If the traders in New York City are bored, the price goes up. If there is an explosion in Iraq, the price goes up. It's endless, with no good news in sight.

3. Natural gas would be a suitable replacement for both, but the price of that goes up quicker than oil as companies realize they have the best replacement for oil. There is no reason for this, except "because".

Wind power does nothing to hurt the environment, does not use any non-renewable energy, and has almost zero long term envirinmental impact. So why not?
Greed. That's why not. It's not the perfect business model to make a zillion dollars while bilking the population at large. There are no business "heros" here, just a will to save resources and help the environment.

I am in the process of trying to convince my congress members here in Texas they need to better support this. While there are some down sides noted, they do not out weigh the absolute benefits.
Mr Ed
Mr Ed
December 12, 2007
Oh, by the way, your wind generation is worth zero if there is freezing rain. Yes there is freezing rain in west Texas.

How do we replace that? Want to sit in the dark until the sun comes up?

Saves fuel, yep. Keeps your lights on? Nope.
robert bernal
robert bernal
December 4, 2007
It seems that texas is a large enough area to disperse intermittancy. If, say, half is always blowing, and the other half, stopped, you would need twice the capacity. Coupled with the fact that the turbines usually crank out about a third of rated = about 6 times more capacity needed than coal, gas, ect. At this rate, minimal storage is needed. However, isn't it cheaper to store than to generate electricity such as in pumped hydroelectric? Also, the EV will act as a dumpload. We need to promote RE since we are running out of fossil fuel and into the dreaded post oil crisis!
ian page
ian page
December 3, 2007
It sounds as though by the time you have incorporated wind variability over the extended farm regions, solar inputs, any tidal and wave inputs, consumer and industry level intelligent demand control, storage, and hybrid vehicles charging,import export between regions the answer is pretty unpredictable by conventional approaches and rules of thumb. I hope someone with a lot of data and a big computer is working on this!
ian page
ian page
December 3, 2007
In passing , you do have to plan for the unexpected total loss of conventional power stations. The nuclear plant 1 mile from my house caught fire a few weeks ago ( just a generator fire- no panic!) an dropped its entire load instantly. The grid handled it with no visible customer disruption.
Mr Ed
Mr Ed
December 2, 2007
My original point was, yes I did not make it well, there is a total MW number that can be online and when the wind stops blowing, or blows too hard, ERCOT will sit in the dark until the grid can be restarted.

Black start has been estimated as restoring 90% of the grid within 40 hours. Hours? Yep. Check ERCOT.com website.
edwin griffin
edwin griffin
December 1, 2007
It is important to get our numbers reasonably correct in order to make rational decisions. As M. Botejue pointed out there is an error in the AWEA quote. I believe the error is mostly in the words describing 1200 billion kwh. I believe the total electrical usage in Texas is 300-400 billion kwh per year so, according to AWEA, wind power could generate three times the total (not just wind) electrical usage in Texas. Perhaps we should question the reliability of the 1200 billion kwhr number available from wind. If I have made a mistake, please correct me.
John Carr
John Carr
December 1, 2007
Interesting,
Most of you have gotten tied up in the minutia, and seem to have missed the point of the article, entirely.

Texas, the home of big OIL, is LEADING the next phase in renewable energy, GLOBALLY. That's because Texans are not sqeamish about extracting energy from their environment. Windmills look a lot sexier, and smell better than jackpumps, (although, jack pumps are more fun to ride!).

Once Texans decide there's money in it, they just do it.
The farmers need the money, the cities need the electricity, and it's green. So, win, win, win.
ian page
ian page
November 30, 2007
Is Mr Ed's point valid for Coal fired stations as well? Ie for everyone you build you need a second on standby for when the generator catches fire , boilers need cleaning out, or lightning knocks out the cables? In the UK there are a number of pumped storage sites to take car of instant response when a power plant goes down, and to handle medium term demand imbalance. I assume this is a solved problem which wind merely brings a slightly new twist to rather than a stopper?
David Martin
David Martin
November 30, 2007
Coal is less variable than wind so you need less backup.
For no source however do you need 100%backup.
Working out what you need and when is a hairy field of statistics - to get the most bang for your buck you optimise a number of things.
These include giving customers reduced rates for being first to be taken off-line in the event of power outages,
connecting to other areas so you can import power, building storage capacity and building emergency generation, often natural gas, to fire up when you are in trouble.
Directly though, coal does need some back-up, but less than wind.
shamil ayntrazi
shamil ayntrazi
November 30, 2007
It would be interesting to investigate producing compressed air using the wind turbine renewable energy, piping this air to the air inlet of a turbo generator, add fuel as needed to meet the required energy output. Thus a power plant would produce power at normal fuel consumption when no wind energy is available, and would produce power at reduced fuel consumption.
George Messier
George Messier
November 30, 2007
Some RE (wind, solar) is not "dispatchable"; the grid cannot ensure its availability coinciding with demand. (You wouldn't want the dentist's drill to slow down for lack of current when a cloud passes over...)
Hence capacity needs to be installed at some multiple, and widely dispersed, to allow for clouds(solar), and no-wind conditions in the case of turbines.
This is a learning curve.
It may not be inaccurate to suggest that all the RE on line today has not reduced emissions one iota, because the total output of that RE falls well within the
"spinning reserve" of conventional(fuel) generators.
Mayura Botejue
Mayura Botejue
November 30, 2007
"A recent American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) assessment found that Texas has the capacity to produce 1200 billion kWh of wind energy per year. That's three times the amount of wind energy currently consumed in the state"

Above statistic (three times the amount of wind energy) is not correct!

1/3 of 1,200 billion kWh = 400 billion kWh = 0.4 billion mWh

0.4 billion mWh = 130,463 MW of wind plant capacity operating @ 35% capacity factor

The current installed capacity in Texas is around 4,000 MW
F. Berry
F. Berry
November 30, 2007
We're in "Mr. Scientist mode again" that's ok; scientists bring a breath of air: And Mayura, don't get your P. in an uproar. Everyone makes mistakes with calculations; just look at what our government thought the war would cost, we're over 2 trillion now.

Won't it be great when we can transition all that money into the coffers of sustainable energy!! Oh,..our politicians will find pork barrel spending, but at least the transition will have Potential energy again.

We need ALL forms of sustainable energy to do the job. PV is needed for small production &/or home energy; as the transmission and attenution issues become mute-irrespective of cost. We still need this planet to live on,...probably for a long long time.
All the Best,..
Brian Kretschmar
Brian Kretschmar
November 30, 2007
"Wilson said Texas has the potential to produce 400 times the amount of energy the state uses each year through renewables"
Some people are lumping nuclear power in with renewables when they state facts like these or when talking about an RPS. Does anyone know if that is the case for the (400) number mentioned in the article?
Greg Hathcox
Greg Hathcox
November 30, 2007
I think its surprising that Texas has installed 1 gigawatt of wind energy this year...At a guestimate of 2MW capacity per wind turbine...that's 500 or more wind turbines installed. TO get to 130,000 MW...they are going to need alot more wind turbines
Stuart Bloom
Stuart Bloom
November 30, 2007
I just drove I-40 through Oklahoma and the Texas panhandle. I actually think the wind farms are an awesome sight (but then, I'm a geeky electrical engineer). The plains already have huge farms, ranches, oil refineries, etc. I felt the same way when I saw the wind farms in northern Germany (around Bremerhaven). One does get used to them. I agree with F. Berry. All of the energy sources need to be investigated, developed, and deployed where each makes the most sense. We aren't Europe. Because we are geographically larger, not everything "Europe" will work here.

Stuart
El Rucio
El Rucio
November 30, 2007
"Past" oil? Despite its headline, the article gives no indication that anybody is moving past oil -- just adding wind.
David Martin
David Martin
November 30, 2007
To Shamil:
Compressed air is used to store wind energy - in Iowa shortly in a big way:
http://www.isepa.com/about_isep.asp
You can also store in reinforced containers - more here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed_air_energy_storage
David Martin
David Martin
November 30, 2007
To George:
Actually, it is inaccurate to say that wind power does not reduce emissions - just nothing like what the headline installed capacity indicates.
As a rough guide, the 2000MW that will be installed in the Pickens windfarm, will average out as producing maybe 400MW or so throughout the year, as the wind doesn't always blow.
The spinning reserve is still saved on though, as of course it is not fired up all the time.
How much carbon you actually save depends on a lot of things, like if you are using natural gas or coal for most of your other capacity (usually coal in Texas)
Things like compressed air storage or importing energy from other parts of the grid also mean that you reduce the carbon emissions compared to spinning up a coal fired station.
So to take a purely illustrative figure, your 2000MW installed might save carbon equivalent to perhaps 200MW of coal fired power.
H Nie
H Nie
November 30, 2007
To benefit the public,we must keep the ENRON Types and wall street gangsters as far as away from these PUBLIC utilities as possible,and have it not turn into another Greedfest ending up in financial disaster,which is typical for predatory capitalism.
NO NUKES is GOOD NUKES.
David Martin
David Martin
November 29, 2007
Intermitency and variability are problems which have been extensively looked at in the European context, where rates of penetration are much higher.
The basic answer is to have a direct current grid spread as widely as possible, ideally more than 1500miles, which is wider than any individual weather system.
Here is a costed analysis of such considerations:
http://www.iset.uni-kassel.de/abt/w3-w/folien/wind21/overview.html
Easier to build in North America than Europe.
You don't need it to be build now, anyway, but solutions are available when wind power reaches high enough percentages to need dealing with.
The US also has a much better solar energy resource than Europe, so solar thermal would also counter the variability of wind as it is variable in a different way.
You certainly would not need one to one back up for even a very high penetration of wind.
Regards,
DaveMart
Mr Ed
Mr Ed
November 29, 2007
How about building Hydrogen plants in the panhandle?
They can generate, make hydrogen out of water, T Boone has plenty, then transport the hydrogen where the fuel is needed?
David Martin
David Martin
November 29, 2007
Hydrogen as a carrier does not work too well - it is leaky and hard to handle, and the end use efficiency is low.
See here for a discussion:
http://entropyproduction.blogspot.com/2006/07/hydrogens-death-knell.html
Transporting the energy as electricity is easier.
Then if you charge up your e-volt car you are good to go.
The energy can also be stored as various liquids, or in batteries or by pumping water for use when the wind is not blowing.
Regards
David Martin
David Martin
November 29, 2007
Here's a group figuring out the best strategies for use of wind power specifically for Texas:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/10/071019184844.htm
Hope this helps
James Sutton
James Sutton
November 29, 2007
Many AC renewables such as wind & hydro need to be controlled. In small scale projects, dumploads such as water heaters are needed if they plan on eliminating inverters and DC storage for when production exceeds demand. In large scale generation, the amount of renewables is small enough that measuring and controlling coal generated electricity is practical.

If wind ever becomes large enough in generation, a electrolysis dumpload (like hydrogen) may be an option.
Mr Ed
Mr Ed
November 28, 2007
For every MW of wind generation on line, there is a requirement of having that much generation available, unloaded or quick start that can ramp up as fast as the wind that falls off.

It does save overall fuel burn, however there is a cost that is not touted.
Carolyn Luce
Carolyn Luce
November 28, 2007
But when the wind farms are spread out several hundreds of miles apart across the state of Texas, the chances that the wind will stop blowing at all of the farms at the same time decreases quite a bit.
John Carr
John Carr
November 28, 2007
I believe the ratio is about 1:1:0.5

Wind : Conventional : Storage

At this ratio wind has a 100% penetration with a 15% Conventional averaged load.

Conventional power plants are already present.
What's needed is storage in the T&D grid to firm the wind power.

So, yes, there are hidden costs. Texas will have to incur these soon if it wants to continue to grow.
Jim Berry
Jim Berry
November 28, 2007
Supposedly the lack of constant wind power, which can be caused by low or high winds, can be an issue in parts of Europe where wind farms have been clustered together.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Graham Jesmer

Graham Jesmer

I am currently a third year Law Student at Vermont Law School where I work as a Research Associate at the Institute for Energy and the Environment writing and researching energy law and policy issues. I also hold a position as a Staff Editor...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Wind Power — Even without the Wind

Most Commented

  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 9
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 5
    Ireland Keen to Hit 2030 Renewable Targets, Says EU Ambassador
  • 1
    No Easy Fix for Broken Wind Turbine at US High School

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • GoGreenSolar.com
  • AEG Power Solutions
  • Green Power Conferences
  • Greenpower Capital
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
  • Renewables Academy AG (RENAC)
  • ASME - American Society of Mechanical Engineers
  • Karbone
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information