Nominate Your Favorite Renewable Energy Project for The 2009 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards
click here for more information
Close
 
Photo Credit: Finavera Renewables
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (7) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
November 8, 2007

While Finavera's Buoy Sinks, Hopes of Harnessing Ocean Energy Survive

by Miriam Widman

Just hours before its scheduled removal, AquaBuOY 2.0 has sunk.

"For the purpose of the project, it was highly successful."

Kevin Bannister, VP for Business Development, Finavera Renewables

Finavera Renewable's 72-foot high wave energy test buoy went down in about 115 feet of water on Oct. 27, just one day before it was to be removed from its location in the waters off of Lincoln County, a part of the Central Oregon Coast. The device had been deployed on September 6.

While company officials say they don't know exactly why it sunk, Finavera Renewable's spokesman Mike Clark said, "It seems to have something to do with the float section of the device." He said the buoy began taking on water and the bilge pump "couldn't keep up with the amount of water it was taking on." The pump failed and the device went down. "We're pretty sure it didn't have anything to do with the power-generating technology," Clark said.

Both Clark and Finavera's Portland-based VP for Business Development, Kevin Bannister, do not believe foul play was involved; saying that the company has excellent relations with local officials and the fishing community.

Hugh Link, the interim administrator for the Oregon Dungeness Crab Commission agrees that the relationship between Finavera and the fishing industry is good.  "We have a really good working relationship with Finavera. They have such a great relationship with the Newport fleet in Lincoln County - everybody feels bad that this happened for them."

Link added, "They want to do the right thing and get it out. "

Wayne Belmont, Lincoln County's attorney, said he'd like the device out "as soon as possible, but we live on the coast and we also recognize that winter weather conditions make it very difficult to do so." Neither Belmont nor Link believed any legal action would result from the 40-ton buoy's mishap. "Stuff happens," Link said. "When you put anything in the ocean you have to be careful."

Finavera's Clark said "we would rather get it out tomorrow if not yesterday" but removing the $ 2 million buoy requires some cooperation.

For one Mother Nature has to play along. The Pacific Ocean off the Oregon Coast can get very nasty as winter approaches. "It's just a piece of steel and we're not going to risk anybody's life to get a piece of steel out of the ocean," Clark said. Secondly Finavera has to line up a salvage crew and that takes 21-days advance notice, Bannister added. He said the company is "investigating other options but the writing seems to be on the wall that we're not going to be able to do that until spring or summer."

That's problematic for local fishermen, especially crabbers, said Link of the crab commission.  The Oregon crabbing season starts Dec. 1 and fishermen are scheduled to drop their gear on Nov. 28.  "It would be easier for them to get it out by the 27th before crab gear was spread out all off the coast in that area," Link said. 

Finavera officials said they would likely learn more about what went wrong the sooner they got the device off the ocean floor. "The evidence will be in better condition than if it's down there for six months," Bannister said.

According to Clark, the test buoy was only engineered to withstand three months of use. It sunk after two. "So when people say - Oh there's this device and it sank. How do you expect it to last 20 years or even five years in a real commercial development? It wasn't designed for that," Clark said. "Granted it wasn't designed for two months either."

Hope Floats 

Although Finavera officials admitted the sunken buoy was not the result they had wanted, they said from a data-gathering point of view, the test was a success. "For the purpose of the project, it was highly successful," Bannister said. "The actual data we got was positive and validated all the modeling," Clark added. Key data was harnessed from the host pump and the power takeoff system, he said. "But that's really hard to explain to people when the device sank - that we still got a lot of valuable information."

Clark said the buoy's sinking would not slow Finavera's wave energy development and the company is working on its third generation buoy - the AquaBuOY 3.0 - as planned. Its next buoy deployment will probably not take place before the end of 2008, Clark said.

Miriam Widman has more than 20 years experience as a journalist and has covered the wave and solar industries for Off the Record Research, an investment research group. She also contributes to NPR and to the Willamette Week, a weekly newspaper in Portland, Oregon.

Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (7)
 
No image available
November 8, 2007
Anytime you test new equipment, something could go wrong. I am sure the design of the AquaBuoy 3.0 will be improved over the present one:

Ode To the Buoy

Tried to test the wintery sea,
But resting now upon the knee,
Of Davy Jones where others dwell.
A buoy now to stay and tell,
A story of wave power extraction,
Did not end in satisfaction,
Bilges filling up too fast,
Could not fully two months last,
T'was not the effort that was lacking,
Work performace was not slacking,
Like Titanic, sprung a leak,
Could not stop from going deep.

As the first train long ago,
Horses pulled to help it go,
Up a hill, it was too weak,
Laughter then but later sweet,
Victory when engines came,
Stronger then and helped to gain,
Transport east, north south and west,
This is what's remembered best.
Buoy's like the train that failed,
Could not move up on the rail,
First time tried and first time beat,
But will not hope in hearts unseat.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 1 of 7
No image available
November 8, 2007
I would have thought they would use a design that couldn't have sunk, by using foam to replace air and thereby eliminate the pump that failed.
Comment 2 of 7
No image available
November 9, 2007
I'm with you Jim, it doesn't seem like a viable design. The ocean environment is extremely harsh which makes it challenging to capture the energy.
Comment 3 of 7
No image available
November 10, 2007
I cannot understand why marine engineers still use steel.
The real answer is in foam sandwich/fibre and positive floating hulls for these RE machines . Then it would not matter if there was a hole and flooding etc .Having done a lot of work on wave power ,I now think the real answer is in flowing dynamic streams ~tidal and river for RE.
Our new device of a "Hapdrag" soon will be published.The biggest and most powerfull machines in the world are draglines and the dynamics of foils are all well known technology .Think of a up-ski lifts the otherway around, being pulled instead of pulling . Use the hapa/foils to drag the cable around~ the drive motor then becomes a generator . Place these RE machines just off headlands> where you have strong currents , top of water falls and weirs etc . Where other do not fish or dare to go .Wet cable cars that now ~can light up the stars!~ Ken > www.4paz.org
Comment 4 of 7
No image available
November 13, 2007
"...it seems to have had something to do with the bilge pump not being able to keep up with the amount of water it was taking on..."

Wasn't that a White Star Line press release after the Titanic sank?

Get it out before it impacts the local fishermen.
Comment 5 of 7
No image available
November 13, 2007
The answer to wave power is not to float on the surface at all.
Sinking to the bottom seems the way to go with a hydraulic pump/piston array that pumps high pressure water to shore for use making electricity or fresh water as required.
See http://www.ceto.com.au/ for how it is done.
Lots of energy here 24x7x365.25
Comment 6 of 7
No image available
November 23, 2008
Finavera kept quiet on some contract details, including the length of time the utility would buy energy and for how much, but said the contract calls for Finavera to deliver electricity from the project by 2010 after a permitting process expected to take two to three years.
----------------
Sally
Sunshine Coast
Comment 7 of 7
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Solar Power Partners, Inc. National Semiconductor Sharp Solar Energy Solutions Group GeoGenix LLC Atlantic Wind & Solar Inc. ATAS International, Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo