Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Homeowners Associations and Solar Panels Don't Always Mix

By Chris Stimpson
November 20, 2007   |   21 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
Anecdotal evidence suggests that individual homeowners trying to 'go green' still face an uphill battle when dealing with HOA boards, but when state laws are on their side the scales usually tip in the homeowners favor.
21 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 21
November 21, 2007
Despite that fact that California has an "elightened" policy about installing solar systems on association roofs, the legislature in its wisdom decided that association roofs are "common use" property. In five years I've never seen anyone have a picnic on our roof and they'd have a heck of a time getting up to it if they wanted to. The legislature did allow that if a majority of the unit owners approved, a PV system can be installed. I did the legwork, got 90% approval, and am now enjoying watching my meter spin backwards.
Comment
2 of 21
November 21, 2007
An important thing to remember is that you need to talk to the people around you. So that they know what to expect. Questions such as; what will is it's fuction? What will it look like. Will it be viewable from the street? Are cosmetics being considered? Things like altering the pitch of the panels to the roof line, or enclosing the supports structure. I monuted the panels on my PV system to match the roof line for cosmetic reasons. The Panels are on the front roof of the house. Thier was a 5-10% output penalty for doing this. Raising the panels would increased the cost of the installation.
Comment
3 of 21
November 21, 2007
We have been fighting the condo commando's in our state of Florida for years and it is a shame that common sense has been taken out of the condo & HOA laws that wre supposed to be for everyone's good and not just for a few. Florida did at least pass a solar rights bill several years ago and it has been upheld in several court rulings and if you want look at the statute it is # 163.04. Check out a web site www.CCFJ.com and if I can offer any information on past cases please contact me info@sun-dome.com
Comment
4 of 21
November 21, 2007
Homeowners should be allowed to have access to solar energy on their own property, whether it be something as simple as a clothesline, or something more "impressive" as solar hot water for the home or the pool, or solar electricity.

There is currently a bill in Congress, called the Solar Act, HR 2848, which will require HOAs to allow homeowners access to solar energy, require retail-rate utility reimbursement from excess renewable energy generation, and require all utilities across this country to support net-metering.

There is a petition that you can sign to show your support for this bill:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/654310470?ltl=1176486404

Take action to support this bill!
Comment
5 of 21
November 21, 2007
We installed Solar roof panels to heat the pool with NO problems. This may have been after the Chandler installation. I just wish we had more Solar panels for our Electricity needs. Over time we will have more. We live in the VALLEY OF THE SUN.
Anthem, Az.
Comment
6 of 21
The very most common "disallowed" by HOA's and developer's covenants is Clothslines.

There is no lower tech, lower cost, way to use solar and wind energy. The image being protected is "No clothsdryer = 'too poor to afford'".

Visuals and sense of status require address...updating, but cannot be ignored because the reasons behind them are not stated..
Comment
7 of 21
November 21, 2007
I'm glad I live in an old neighborhood in a pretty green city, with no gates and no HOA's. I can't imagine wanting to make things uniform and corporate-looking. I find that look sick and boring. I enjoy the many non-lawns, more of which sprout up every year. I am slowly eroding my lawn and adding useful plants for food and medicine. When solar gets to 50% efficiency, inexpensive, and nano, I want to go for it.
Comment
8 of 21
November 21, 2007
I am of mixed minds on the subject. Yes, HOA's are beneficial in keeping things looking "nice," but they can also be obstructive entities. Flat out, B&W rules, don't always make sense. As in this case, a lot of time and trouble could have been avoided, by willingness to compromise. Rules that specify, in detail, roof colors, etc. are going too far. Sensible rules allow a range of colors, and types. They also allow for changes in technology, and things that _add_ value to houses and neighborhoods. Which _is_ the purpose behind the HOA in the first place.
Comment
9 of 21
November 21, 2007
Part #2. So this gentleman was legitimately challenged by the Board (of which he was a voting member...and was probably outvoted -- he should have known better) to remove the panels. He did so willingly, rather than being legally (and legitimately) challenged in court. After the state legislature closed the loophole, the gentleman followed the proper protocol, went to the Board with the new change in the state law, petitioned for permission to reinstall the panels, and the Board approved it the same day. The panels were reinstalled, and everyone's feelings were restored. It was handled 'properly' this time. And nobody has purple mailboxes or plastic pink flamingoes in their front yards. Case closed. Let's not go looking for people to judge and "punch out", lest we be judged.
Comment
10 of 21
November 21, 2007
Aw folks, let's not turn this into some confrontational drama here. This gentleman bought a home in a development that had an operating HOA and a set of covenants -- which all the homebuyers both agreed to...and had a responsibility to follow as a condition of their purchase. Probably what happened here is this gentleman acted unilaterally to put pool heater panels on his roof. Neighbors, for some reason, perhaps found this unsightly, but perhaps not. Maybe what they objected to was his unilateral (without permission of the Board) action, which could open a Pandora's Box, allowing others to paint their mailboxes purple, or put giant planters of fake flowers and plastic pink flamingo statues in their front yards. (See #2 below)
Comment
11 of 21
November 21, 2007
Any residential installer can tell you of PV sales that didn't materialize because of the esthetics, or because of concerns over diminished resale value, etc.
HOAs are simply groups of homeowners, plain and simple. Armand Neukerman handled it well. kudos.

As to esthetics: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
The industry is investing no small amount of time and money to make PV more esthetically pleasing.

And happily, there are studies demonstrating that PV actually enhances home resale value. We're making progress.

In the commercial sector("bigbox" flat roofs), roof integrity issues are a real show stopper. Owners/bldg managers extremely reluctant to risk compromising roof integrity to save a penny or two/kWhr. There are solutions.
Comment
12 of 21
November 21, 2007
It's the same everywhere in the US and probably the world. When one manages to reach a certain "level" in the world; many times they forget where they came from and how hard it was to get there.

If we want to live on a desolate planet in beuatiful homes, don't worry,..we're getting there fast.

Soon BiPV economies will allow for beauty/function and be mandated for all sunny states; starting with Calif., Nevada and Florida. The trickle down states will later benefit from increases in technology and installer pricing competition.

All the Best,..
Comment
13 of 21
November 21, 2007
Wow. One would think that the HOA would like to support such environmental responsibility and the positive message the homeowner gave by putting up the solar panels. This is a homeowner that spent his own money to be environmentally conscience and gets witch-hunted. Unbelievable. The HOA should be ashamed of themselves. What kind of message is this for our kids?
Comment
14 of 21
November 21, 2007
Fortunately I don't live in a community with a homeowners' association. But there are still restrictive covenants in deeds and "stalling" by public utilities in making installations they don't like that can stymie progress.
Comment
15 of 21
November 22, 2007
Back in 1979, in California, and before the Solar Rights Act which enabled solar companies to deal positively with HOA's, we used to mention the fact that the Greeks had a written LAW 2,000 years ago that prevented indiscriminate solar access issues. ie., 'no person should shade or prevent access to the availability of solar energy'.

We used to laugh about the fact that current government administrations were still tied up discussing that which more intelligent minds had already covered.

Maybe the HOA's that still have aesthetic 'issues' would prefer having barrels of oil poised on roofs and painted to match the surrounding smoggy air that paints the sky a dim gray colour. Better yet, maybe a couple of camouflaged Hummers, standing guard.

Wake up HOA people.
Comment
16 of 21
November 23, 2007
I live in a historic district made up of the 1000+ units built for officers' housing pursuant to the construction of the Pentagon in 1941,2. The entrenched community association acts with favoritism and arbitrariness. Such associations simply add to the zoning overlay. Due to such favoritism and arbitrariness, someday a class action suit will likely go to the state and federal Supreme Courts, and I believe that the baby will be thrown out with the bathwater by removing valuable and necessary controls along with the absurd decisions that some associations like mine make.
Comment
17 of 21
November 28, 2007
Part 2:
As to changing it by legislation, there was a bill in the TX legislature to eliminate some of the oversight of HOAs, but I suspect that they would still have their say based on location, color, etc. The bill wasn't passed last year. I'm thinking that federal legislation might be the answer because I look out one of my windows and see two of the ugliest satellite TV receivers sitting on the roof of a neighbor's house. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 made that possible. While I think federal law might be the answer, I hope there aren't any unintended consequences.
Comment
18 of 21
November 28, 2007
Part 1:
I recently moved to TX to an HOA. When I first started looking, I was amazed at the lack of PV or thermal on the of roofs I passed while driving around. What a waste of a resource, I thought. I found out that the HOA convenants were the cause. I ended up buying in an HOA and knew that the convenants would prevent me from installing solar. I elected to buy anyway, choosing a house with a backyard facing south with lots of open roof. It's my goal to work to get solar approved in my neighborhood, whether it takes a year or ten.

I asked the architectural committee what they thought of solar and was told that it was unlikely based on aesthetics. Obviously, I have a lot of work to do to change the attitudes but it's a challenge that I am looking forward to.
Comment
19 of 21
November 29, 2007
Being environmentally responsible does not suddenly entitle one to be irresponsible in other contexts. HOAs are voluntary associations based on reciprocal promises between the homeowners to obey the rules that they agree will govern their subdivision. As is true of statutes, when originally promulgated, covenants are based on the world as it is, not necessarily upon what the world might become. Every HOA has a process for amending the covenants in light of new information and/or changes in neighborhood experience and expectations. Those homeownwers who decide to do their own thing -- break their promise to their neighbors, then hide under the cover of green-ness as they lash out at the HOA for calling them on their broken promise-- are not hapless victims. Just as prominent as their roof top PV panel might be, so is their selfish disregard of the rules they voluntarily agree to in the first place!
Comment
20 of 21
March 19, 2008
HOAs are usually run by a small group who do not have to be responsible and/or responsive to the members. In my case the developer still owns the HOA even though the last house was finished over 2 years ago. So the "board" is merely advisory in nature and the developer is the entire HOA Board even though we all pay dues. They just turned down our solar pool heater even though it would lay on the ground (no more than 2" high) and be virtually unseen from the street or other properties. They previously approved a solar hot water heater that sits on my neighbors front roof and is bright silver. I guess I'll have to sue just to get equal treatment.
Comment
21 of 21
September 4, 2008
I recently volunteered to help my HOA 's architecture committe in Fremont, CA to come up with a positive, proactive spec that will make installation of solar panels as simple as possible in terms of seeking/receiving Board approval while still maintaining the aesthetics of the development.

Rathter than re-invent the wheel, I was hoping to hear from other HOAs in California that already have addressed this issue and perhaps receive from them some examples of their wording and any issues they have worked around for the sake of the homeowners.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Chris Stimpson

View Chris Stimpson's Profile
About: I am executive campaigner for Solar Nation, the nationwide grass roots advocacy group for solar power. I am committed to bringing Solar into its proper place i... more »

Advertise With Us

Leybold Optics 2GreenEnergy.com North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners AltE UnThink Solar Texas Solar Energy Society Upsolar
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters