Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

What's the Funding Outlook for DOE's Geothermal Program in 2008?

By Karl Gawell
August 7, 2007   |   9 Comments

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

9 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 9
August 8, 2007
There is no need to drill very far in Yellowstone to get geothermal energy. What the heck do these people think "Old Faithful" is?  Or am I wromg to think that those geysers are hot water?
Comment
2 of 9
August 8, 2007
<p>To update Karl's article, the McNerny EGS bill, HR 2304, was incorporated into the House's overall energy bill, HR 3221 (&quot;New Direction for Energy Independence, National Security, and Consumer Protection Act&quot;). </p><p>This was passed on August 4 (<a href="http://clerk.house.gov/cgi-bin/vote.asp?year=2007&amp;rollnumber=832" target="_blank">see vote here</a>), along with HR 2776 (&quot;Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2007&quot;&nbsp;<a href="http://clerk.house.gov/cgi-bin/vote.asp?year=2007&amp;rollnumber=835" target="_blank">see vote here</a>).</p>
Comment
3 of 9
August 8, 2007
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) recently published a report tiled, <em><span style="font-family: Arial"><a href="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/pdfs/40665.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-style: normal">Geothermal -- The Energy Under Our Feet</span></a></span></em>, which estimates that co-produced and geopressured resources could supply as much as 70,000 MW of new power -- 10% of our total national electric power needs -- in the next 20 years.&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial"><a href="http://www.smu.edu/geothermal/" target="_blank">Southern Methodist University</a> (SMU) researchers have documented the large amounts of hot water produced by existing oil and gas wells. In </span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">West Texas</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">, for example, for every barrel of oil produced, nearly 100 barrels of hot water are co-produced. In 2002, </span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">Texas</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial"> produced over 12 billion barrels of waste (often hot) water as a byproduct of oil and gas extraction, which was reinjected into the ground at a cost to the producer. </span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial"><a href="http://geothermal.inel.gov/publications/future_of_geothermal_energy.pdf" target="_blank">&quot;The Future of Geothermal Energy &ndash; Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century,&quot;</a> a report prepared by an MIT-led interdisciplinary panel, was released to the public January 22, 2007.<span>&nbsp; </span>According to the report, &ldquo;geothermal energy from EGS represents a large, indigenous resource that can provide base-load electric power and heat at a level that can have a major impact on the </span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">United States</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">, while incurring minimal environmental impacts. With a reasonable investment in R&amp;D, EGS could provide 100 GWe or more of cost-competitive generating capacity in the next 50 years. Further, EGS provides a secure source of power for the long term that would help protect </span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">America</span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial"> against economic instabilities resulting from fuel price fluctuations or supply disruptions. Most of the key technical requirements to make EGS work economically over a wide area of the country are in effect, with remaining goals easily within reach. This achievement could provide performance verification at a commercial scale within a 10- to 15-year period nationwide.&rdquo;</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">&nbsp;</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">Worldwide, there is huge potential for geothermal as a clean energy source.&nbsp; The Bush administration is doing everything in its power to&nbsp;squash R&amp;D because geothermal energy solutions would seriously cut into the profits of the big oil and coal industries.<span>&nbsp; </span>It&rsquo;s time that we stand up to big oil and coal and move away from dirty and deadly fossil fuels to clean renewable energy.<span>&nbsp; </span>Geothermal is just one of many solutions.</span></p>
Comment
4 of 9
August 8, 2007
<p>Will the recent action of Congress to shift $15 billion&nbsp;from Oil Pork to renewables help the development of Geothermal? </p><p>If Lil Bush doesn't veto the bill, then maybe Geothermal can be developed the way it should be.</p>
Comment
5 of 9
August 8, 2007
<p>After looking at&nbsp;the new Andasol CSP plant&nbsp;here in Spain which is very ugly and huge, and seeing the environmental destruction of coal,&nbsp;gas&nbsp;and oil mining in New Mexico, and the unsolved contamination risks and huge costs of nuclear power, it makes sense to work harder on Geothermal.</p><p>The only issue I have heard bad about geothermal, is that a pilot project in Basil, Switzerland, seemed to have triggered an earthquake.</p><p>I wonder whose hidden economic/political agenda is being served by not funding geothermal research? Granted I don't know a lot about geothermal, but it seems great. Lots of heat to produce electricity, small environmental footprint, and always available, 24/7. Maybe because it is&nbsp;TOO good, and will put the coal/oil/gas/nuclear/solar/wind people out of business? Please correct these assumptions if you know better!</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
Comment
6 of 9
August 8, 2007
An excellent article. It is frightening how the big oil and coal interests have succeeded in getting the government to waste billions on research for unpromising projects like &quot;clean coal&quot; and hydrogen while virtually nothing is spent on geothermal power, which could usher in a new age of plentiful, clean energy. Geothermal works right now and can compete with clean coal power in the Western United States. It can compete in the east if new techniques are developed as outlined in the MIT report. Unlike wind and solar, geothermal worts 24/7 to provide baseload power. Geothermal plants could be built much faster than nuclear plants which will require decades to design and build. It is a crime that funding is virtually zero.
Comment
7 of 9
August 9, 2007
The potential of geothermal, especially deep rocks geothermal, as outlined in the January MIT Report, is huge. I come at this from a climate change perspective, and the importance of developing this baseload power source can not be over-estimated.

Compared to other energy sources, however, such as solar, wind, and even landfill gas, geothermal has had almost no media attention, no NGO activist attention, and therefore has no traction.

I see the need for a global alliance of geothermal supporters, from USA, Australia, Germany, and wherever else the technical homework has been done, and for an organized funded effort to get geothermal into the public debate.

Whether it is to tackle climate change, address peak oil, or homeland security, geothermal is crucially important.

-Guy Dauncey, Victoria, Canada, www.earthfuture.com
Comment
8 of 9
August 9, 2007
You are banding around figures of a few tens of millions of dollars.&nbsp; Get real.&nbsp; We hear quoted in the news extimates that America is spending a billion dollars a day in Iraq.&nbsp; I find this hard to believe but suppose that it is only half of this amount.&nbsp; It wasn't to stop terrorism - this was clearly disproven.&nbsp; It wasn't to eliminate weapons of mass distruction - this was clearly disproven - so what do we have left.&nbsp; We have left securing the energy supply of America.&nbsp; Would someone please calculate how much renewable energy we could now be generating if all the money spent only on the most recent gulf war had been spent on wind generators, water current generators, wave generators, efficient light bulbs, solar panels for heating domestic water and so forth ad nauseum.&nbsp; Would there now be any need for America to secure her overseas energy resources.&nbsp; With demand for oil based products that much lowered, would liquid fuel not now be much cheaper all over the world and .......if this money had been spent on these renewable energy generators and energy saving devices, how many people would now be alive who aren't.
Comment
9 of 9
October 14, 2007
The underfunding of geothermal development seems to be a worldwide problem. Both China and India have very active programs to develop wind and solar power, yet geothermal is barely mentioned. they presently have only 30 MW of geothermal power developed compared to 5000 MW of wind.
For 2010, their 5 yr plan projects only an additional 25-50 MW of geothermal power! Insignificant compared to the 3000-5000 MW goal for wind power!
Look at this Chinese alt-energy conference with NO MENTION of geothermal:
http://www.alt-power.com/en/overview.php
India has a similar dismal record for geothermal awareness. It seems that the geothermal industry has done a terrible job of selling themselves.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Karl Gawell

View Karl Gawell's Profile
About: Karl has been the Executive Director of the Geothermal Energy Association since 1997. He was formerly Director of Government Affairs for the American Wind Energ... more »

Advertise With Us

Hydrogen Education Foundation groSolar REC Solar SunMaxx Solar Biomass Thermal Energy Council (BTEC) Sharp Solar Energy Solutions Group Stoel Rives LLP
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters