Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Slimmed-Down U.S. Energy Bills Raise Major Questions

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"This is the moment of truth-right now, in July. We have to win this vote if we are to get an RPS passed this year."

-- Greg Wetstone, AWEA, Senior Director of Government & Public Affairs
15 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 15
July 5, 2007
<p>The creation of&nbsp; an&nbsp; uncertain tax and regulatory enviroment is going to discourage investment in alternatives and delay their expansion. That may be the goal of the opponents of the legislation.</p><p>Considering the amount of monies involved, some special interest must be able to foresee some gain by delaying investments in alternatives. Maybe its oil companies or utitlies companies that have to buy the more expensive power.</p><p>Also the article refers to a &quot;cap&quot; on credits to some producers. That could be the cause of the delay - in fighting over who can get a cut of the pie. Who knows, maybe Senator Kennedy has created a &quot;cap&quot; that would encompass a certain off shore wind project near his home. (pure guess work but it is in his nature). &nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
Comment
2 of 15
July 5, 2007
<p>Our government will effectively discourage wind energy expansion without a full value, long-term, production tax credit in place. If members of Congress are honest about alternate energy development for our country, they should support this isssue. </p><p>adrianakau2aol.com</p>
Comment
3 of 15
July 5, 2007
Too many special interests = weak legislation.&nbsp;
Comment
4 of 15
July 6, 2007
<p>Business as usual on Capitol Hill (regardless the party &quot;in power&quot;; i.e., it's the lobbyists who pull the strings) means, as usual, it's up to the real leaders: not just innovators, entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, but the people themselves, the power consumers. As enlightenment spreads (and it does, albeit slowly at times), the people will lead their so-called leaders. The demand for clean energy is rising from the bottom up; our legislators will eventually come round to see the wisdom. The grass-roots revolution, it is to be hoped, will empower the people to regain some measure of control of (let alone confidence in) their government. (That, and publicly financed elections!)</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
Comment
5 of 15
July 6, 2007
<p>I love the fact that &quot;a concerned youth&quot;'s priorities include the price of beer! The more things change, the more they stay the same.</p><p>Large wind farms that benefit from the production credits, are by nature located in remote areas. That means you and I pay for the transmission facilities. I believe that distributed production, using smaller turbines closer to the load, serves our natinal security far more effectively. It may also be more economical overall.</p><p>The observation about Teddy K. is right on target. Perhaps they should rename the Cape Wind project the Mary Jo Koepekne Memorial Wind Farm. He should actually be championing wind energy. After all, that's what has kept him going for years!</p>
Comment
6 of 15
July 6, 2007
<p>Right on Mike Holly.&nbsp; It would be very interesting to see what the winners would be if <strong>ALL</strong> subsidies were removed, including to gas, oil, coal and nuclear and everyone was playing on a level playing field.&nbsp; Today, no one can tell us what the actual cost of each type of power.&nbsp; In a free and open marketplace, innovation would thrive.&nbsp; </p><p>Fortunately, in spite of a level playing field, investors are pouring their money into clean tech and it will be the winner.</p><p>Jim</p>
Comment
7 of 15
<span style="font-size: 8.5pt; font-family: Verdana">In the mist of European tax incentives and china pledging hundreds of millions to renewable; again it seems that the United States is trailing the rest of the world in thought and action.</span><span style="font-size: 8.5pt; font-family: Verdana">p.s. why are we supporting ethanol? Now beer is expensive, cheese, corn etc!</span><span style="font-size: 8.5pt; font-family: Verdana">Support Solar and Wind Power!</span> <p>-nick</p><p>( a concerned youth)</p>
Comment
8 of 15
July 6, 2007
Mandates and&nbsp;tax subisdies will only help those&nbsp;wind developers who are connected with the their utility friends.&nbsp; What the country really&nbsp;needs are genuine efforts to create free markets.
Comment
9 of 15
July 6, 2007
<p>This is going to be a slow process, and Bush stands at the end of it.&nbsp; </p><p>As long as there is no catastrophic event, which throws the economy as a whole into chaos, I think that time is on our side.&nbsp; More people at all levels of society are coming on board every day, because the logic of the benefits of change are in our favor.</p><p>The price of&nbsp;energy isn't going to go down unless something really unforseen comes about,&nbsp;for example, peace breaking out in the Mid-East.</p><p>I say, keep the pressure on our representatives, but don't fret if there's no instant gratification in terms of Legislation.&nbsp; The market is doing alot of the work for us as perceptions of the value of energy&nbsp;in America evolve in response to the economic, political, and environmetnal realities that are becoming more&nbsp;apparent with every passing moment.</p>
Comment
10 of 15
July 7, 2007
<p>Let's support PTC for all forms of renewable energy:&nbsp; wind, solar, tidal, geothermal, and biofuels.&nbsp; Don't knock ethanol because it has shortcomings, as ethanol has proven success in Brazil and soon we will switch to non-food biomass (garbage and waste vegetation like corn stover)&nbsp; as feedstocks for cellulosic ethanol.&nbsp; The corn-based production facilities will change over to cellulose a&nbsp; lot faster than building new facilities when cellulose becomes more commercially feasible.&nbsp; Besides, it is hard to power an automobile with&nbsp; that little propeller on the roof.&nbsp; Wind and solar are great for electricity, but we need to work on renewable motor fuels as part of the energy bill at the same time.</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
Comment
11 of 15
July 8, 2007
<p>I think the ONLY things this Congress can do without Bush's signature is to defund illegal occupations of sovereign states and impeachment of&nbsp;Cheney, then Bush for transgressions against the US Constitution and humanity in general. </p><p>Local pork will be the only product from this craven Congress, sadly.&nbsp;These ninnies are in campaign mode continually.&nbsp; Governance?&nbsp; Moi?!</p><p>I say fire the lot of 'em!&nbsp;&nbsp; Especially, the Speaker!</p>
Comment
12 of 15
<p>Rather than a tax credit I have always believed the alternative energy industry should almost virtually reflect the taxing system of the oil industry.&nbsp; The little guy got into the oil industy by government economic push.&nbsp; </p><p>When drilling for an oil well the oil investor can write off about 85% of the cost to the prior tax year if drilling starts by Febraury 15th of the current year.&nbsp; The other 15% is written off by amortization.&nbsp; </p><p>From what I am reading the current alternative fuel industry is controlled by big utilities and big industry.&nbsp; Small investors rarely get an investment opportunity unless through a stock purchase.&nbsp; </p><p>Encapsulate the industry in tax incentives and not tax credits and the smaller investors will&nbsp;congregate at the alternative oil trough.</p><p>In a prior issue&nbsp;an article mentioned the wind industry is 1% of our energy consumption in the U.S.&nbsp; </p><p>A tax write-off&nbsp;post 2000 helped the economy.</p><p>The oil industry tax incentives generated cash for oil barons.&nbsp; Let's create the alternative oil barons of tomorrow with the exact same&nbsp;carrot.</p>
Comment
13 of 15
July 9, 2007
<p>&nbsp;The diverse alternative energy industry is a special interest group, or rather&nbsp;groups. Where are OUR lobbyists? Who is sitting in YOUR Representative's office explaining the long term benefits to their election prospects by representing our agenda?&nbsp; We can all complain all we want about government, but it means little if we don't aggressively engage our representatives.&nbsp; If you don't have at least one&nbsp;official&nbsp;response letter from your each of your representatives, get with it!&nbsp; These people don't live in a vacuum.&nbsp; If we don't fill there ears and minds with our agenda, other interests&nbsp;will drown us out.</p><p>Unfortunately, I'm short a few autographs too.&nbsp; </p>
Comment
14 of 15
July 9, 2007
The United States is falling far behind other countries in regards to renewable energy.&nbsp; I agree with an earlier post, we need to look/invest/progress in solar and wind energy-not ethanol!
Comment
15 of 15
July 10, 2007
<p>Although&nbsp; Wind is&nbsp; a small portion of our current electrical production in America, it is already on the track to be the dominate form of alternative energy in America and worldwide.</p><p>Everyday in America, over 10 MegaWatts (20,000 homes) of wind is installed and the rate is increasing. Several new factories are going on line in the next couple of years for the production of wind mill equipment. Also the next generation of offshore 5 MW systems are going to appear soon (anyone have a date?). Those monsters will just add on to the exisiting base.&nbsp; </p><p>Wind power is going to be built regardless of the subsidies. The factories are sold out for the most part - some supposed for two years worth of production. </p><p>The tax/subsides issue appear to really be sideshows for the politician to make money for their budies. Regardless of the tax/subsidies, every wind mill that can be made in the next couple of years is going to be sold and installed. That is a pretty good deal for any factory and enough to encourage more investments. Why bother with higher subsidies? </p><p>&nbsp;</p>
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Carl Levesque

View Carl Levesque's Profile
About: Carl is Editor & Publications Manager at the American Wind Energy Association, where has worked since 2006. At AWEA he oversees AWEA's online and print publicat... more »

Advertise With Us

SMA America, LLC Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. Geothermal Resources Council SolarNexus Mannvit Apricus, Inc. Natural Power
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters