Sara Parker, Staff Writer
June 14, 2007
|
17 Comments
While hybrid solar lighting technology is still in its infancy compared to solar photovoltaic (PV) and solar thermal, the technology is slowly gaining recognition as a legitimate contender in the race to become a commercially viable technology. Set to enter the U.S. market in 2008, the hybrid technology recently earned the Excellence in Technology Transfer Award from the Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer.
The award is presented to federal laboratory employees for outstanding work in the process of transferring a technology to the commercial marketplace. In this case, the award recognized a team of researchers at the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).
The Oak-Ridge developed hybrid solar lighting (HSL) technology uses a rooftop-mounted 48-inch diameter collector and secondary mirror that tracks the sun throughout the day. The collector system focuses the sunlight into 127 optical fibers connected to special light fixtures equipped with diffusion rods similar to fluorescent light bulbs. The rods spread light in all directions.
One collector currently powers 8 to 10 hybrid light fixtures that can illuminate about 1,000 square feet of space. During times of little or no sunlight, a sensor controls the intensity of fluorescent lamps to maintain a constant level of illumination.
According to ORNL, the system is estimated to save about 6,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year in lighting and another 2,000 kWh in reduced cooling needs for a total savings of 8,000 kWh per year.
"The Hybrid Solar Lighting technology is fundamentally different from PV and solar thermal," said John Morris, president of Sunlight Direct, Inc., which licensed the technology from ORNL. "Our system transmits light in order to reduce the electrical need for lighting within a building. It does not convert sunlight to electricity but rather delivers the natural lighting directly into the building—with 50% efficiency."
If PV panels were used to convert the sunlight to electricity and then to convert the electricity back into lighting, the conversions would result in only about 2%-8% efficiency, Morris added.
"For applications involving incandescent lamps, one HSL system typically displaces about 3,000 watts of energy use associated with lighting. At the current fully installed cost, that translates into about $5-$8 per watt. This is almost twice as cost effective as PV panels, which typically run $10 per watt fully installed," said Morris, noting all costs are before rebates.
But as with many technologies being developed in the lab, the primary challenge now is to consistently demonstrate the efficiency of the hybrid technology system—and then increase that efficiency while reducing the price to the customer, said Morris.
Currently, there are 21 hybrid lighting systems being tested at various demonstration projects around in the U.S. including a Wal-Mart in McKinney, Texas; a Staples in Long Island, New York; a Braden's Furniture showroom in Knoxville, Tennessee; The Naval Exchange in Hawaii; office space at San Diego State University; the Aveda corporate headquarters in Minneapolis, Minnesota; and ORNL's Multi-Purpose Research Facility.
Sunlight Direct, Inc., is planning for the commercial release of the HSL technology in the first quarter of 2008.
The Excellence in Technology Transfer Award was presented to representatives of the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory during the consortium's annual convention in Arlington, Texas, last month. The Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer is composed of more than 700 federal laboratories and facilities representing approximately 100,000 scientists and engineers.
In addition to this award, the hybrid solar lighting technology earned an R&D 100 Award and a Southeast Region Federal Laboratory Consortium Award in 2006.The technology was developed through funding by DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Solar Technologies Program, along with a partnership of utility companies, state energy agencies, industry and universities.
Does the fluorescent lamp channel light through the fiber optics? If so, why would Flourescents be the best fit?
Is Bill saying that the tech wouldn't work in the North East or is he saying that there is only a certain % of time that it would work. Please elaborate Bill if you would.
Matt
The efficiency of this application is great. But, unless I'm mistaken it would have better value in commercial applications where lighting is mainly used in the day.
Since I'm not home much during the day, the lighting at my house is only needed at night and it doesn't look like this application would work then.
PS - Thomas, I agree with John, please stay on topic. One of the most frustrating traits of this website is how so many people just rant on random off-topic issues.
Don't forget, not to be negative, the only light that can be utilized is direct beam sunlight not diffuse. PV uses both "forms" of sunshine. So, concentrating systems are best used in areas that get mostly direct sunlight not allot of diffuse energy like the North East and some other areas.
.....Bill
I guess this is used only when the sun is shining right? What happens if it is raining or no sunshine?
i guees we need to supplement this with regular powered bulbs.
Man made?
What, do you suppose, did people do before utilitized polyphasic electricity?
It shouldnt be that hard to learn about, after all it was only about 100 years ago.
Who was it, Nikola Tesla that invented alternating current electricity and the fluorescent light and all the many things that followed such as transformers, and motors? He died in the 1940's I think.
Is it that hard to see, to believe, to understand that at this current rate of population growth, soon we are going to be elbow to elbow with every other human on Earth. What then?
Not likley , right? We will have ravaged the Earth by then. Not out of desire but by shear numbers alone. Kind of like a plague of locust on a field of wheat. The individual locust is hungry so it eats but there are so many indidvdual locust that are hungry at the same time. So, humans are not so highly evolved after all. Its all just a delusion.
Man made, pshh! Big deal. Humans are over rated.
That sounds great, I can't wait to see one installed. Is there a way to make them work with LEDs? or is that not bright enough of a light?
When could I expect to see a viewable installation in New England.
Full spectrum solar lighting from sunlight passing through mirror systems or by other means into areas of human habitat have advantages other than saving power. Humans have a need for the sun's rays to produce vitamin D for strong bones, to build up their immune system and to help them feel better.
Studies have found that full spectrum lighting in malls encourages shoppers to spend more time shopping. Students in schools with full spectrum lighting have much better attendence than in schools without this type of lighting. Studies have also shown that full spectrum lighting during the winter time is also good for the workplace and homes because it prevents depression.
adrianakau2aol.com
Matt:
I'm afraid you might not fully understand the technology. The sunlight is not at all converted into electricity nor does it use a bulb to create the light- it is simply fed through fiber optics from the roof into the building. By doing so, there is no need to lose efficiency converting from one energy form to another, and you simply capture and transmit sunlight directly.
To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.
February 15, 2010