Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

700 MW of Electricity to Come from Landfill Gas

June 27, 2007   |   6 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"Landfill gas to energy projects provide an important contribution to the country's renewable energy portfolio."

--Paul Pabor, Waste Management, VP of Renewable Energy
Content Technologies
 
6 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 6
June 28, 2007
Good job.  We need to make energy out of anything we can, especially if it's good for the environment.
Comment
2 of 6
June 29, 2007
 IF WE DO LIKE THE FRENCH, JAPANESE, GERMANS,& SPAINARDS: WE SHOULD FARE WELL IN SORTING OUT ALL OF THE TRASH INTO THE MOST EFFICIENT USEFUL RECYCLING METHOD KNOWN TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF REUSE BUT IN DIFFERENT FORMS FOR DIFFERENT USES
Comment
3 of 6
June 29, 2007
<p>I sit on the town recycling committee for Brunswick, Maine.</p><p>&nbsp;We were the first town in Maine to institute 'single bag' trash disposal.</p><p>&nbsp;There is a list of items that are seperated and picked up by a recycling truck--glass, plastics(most), metal, cardboard, newsprint, gray board, etc.; hazardous stuff is taken to a sep. disposal site; as are hard-to-dispose items like tires, computers, lawnmowers, etc. </p><p>The DPW encourages food waste composting and sells an inexpensive composting bin---I've got one at the back door.</p><p>What's left goes into a bag with a weight limit of 35 lbs. that is picked up by a private company owned by CASSELLA; and taken to the soon-to-be-closed town landfill.</p><p>Eventually, the bags wil be taken to a large new recycling factory that seperates what's in the bags into recyclables---cardboard, plastic, glass, etc.</p><p>Despite a lot of complaining about the extra cost of the bags--on top of taxes; the results have been amazing. </p><p>Trash amounts, i.e. what would normally go into the bag; have been halved and continue to drop.</p><p>&nbsp;The secondary market is the major hangup; as is the reluctance of the DPW to get into the recycling business--ah, the cost of a new bailer, etc.</p><p>A looming problem is that trash disposal is now privatized and the town will lose its capacity to resume it in the future; the two companies that dominate the field are near monopolies and you can see what this means in the future when they get a 'lock' on the business.....reopen the landfill?&nbsp; NOT. </p>
Comment
4 of 6
June 30, 2007
<p align="left">The production of biogas from natural raw materials and municipal waste materials has been safely in operation for a number of years. It possible to produce electrical power and waste heat in electrical power plants using the biogas. In fact, biogas applications are among the most promising early applications for microturbines. There is a growing level of interest around microturbines due to their ability to use low calorific value fuel, their low maintenance requirements, low NOx emissions, modularity and portability. The energy effectiveness of such biogas utilization is within the range of 30 % at max. However, together with the utilization of waste heat, it is possible to increase the effectiveness of the conventional use of biogas in the production of electrical power up to 65 or 75 %. This rather simple reasoning indicates that, if there is no arrangement for the waste heat utilization, the cost-effectiveness of the utilization of biogas in the production of electrical power remains somewhere near the edge.</p>
Comment
5 of 6
June 30, 2007
It would be preferable to burn the waste directly rather than just collecting and burning the gas that it produces. First, a lot more energy would be produced because most of the waste does not decompose in a landfill. About half of landfill gas power plants in California are under 5 MW, with many being less than 3 MW. Only 15% are over 10 MW, and only two plants are over 13 MW. A municipal sold waste (MSW) power plant is likely to have a capacity several times larger than a landfill gas power plant that receives the same amount of waste. I would estimate that a plant replacing an average landfill would be 10 to 25 MW, with larger plants being up to 50 or even 100 MW (the landfill would not be fully replaced as about 10% of the waste volume would still need to be disposed of as ash). A MSW plant also has the advantages of metal recovery, greatly reduced volume and destruction of some types of pollutants. It should be noted that recycleable materials and hazardous wastes are not burned, at least in U.S. plants.
Comment
6 of 6
March 28, 2010
Dear Sir,
Im from Indonesia, and we starting our new "Landfill Gas for electricity" Project. Please come by, and give us your opinion :

http://fotounik.net/bekasi-bersih-partisipasi-blogger/

Best Regards
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Mannvit Konica Minolta Sensing Americas, Inc 350 Media Texas Renewable Energy Industries Association The Interstate Renewable Energy Council Standard Solar Inc. Conergy Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters