Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

2007: The Year of the Thin Film PV Stock

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
Amorphous Silicon had the largest share of the thin film market (64%) as of the end of 2005. Cadmium Telluride had 26% share of the market and is ramping up very rapidly, with Copper Indium Gallium Selenide having a 10% share of the thin film market, with great potential, but is the least understood and least developed of the three materials.

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

23 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 23
May 4, 2007
Michael- Shell sold their operation in Camarillo to Siemens. Judging from the comments, most people would like to invest in internet stocks (represented by First Solar & others) rather than Warren Buffet stocks (represented by Sharp, Kyocera & BP). Good luck with your investments.
Comment
2 of 23
May 4, 2007
Join the Grass Roots Program ...It is our duty to TELL them how to vote.

This site gives you all of your contact info by using your state and zip then allows you to sign a form letter or script your own letter, both methods on site, then the site emails you of the vote results and how your congressman voted, AWEA also informs you of upcoming votes so that you can remain on top of the issue.

http://www.awea.org/legislative/Grassroots.aspx

Please We must take the time and this method is just too fast and easy for excuses.
Comment
3 of 23
I am also of the view that thin film technologies will make steady inroads into the domain of crystalline Silicon technologies. a-Si or CdTe or CIGS. I would put my money on amorphous silicon (despite the Staebler Wronski effect) - on glass superstrate or stailess steel substrate or plastic substrate. In India a-Si modules have been successfully used for solar PV pumping applications (better high temperature characteristics, better spectral response and the ability to offer a better match to the pump (we had used a DC motor driven floating pump -centrifugal). True it may take another 5 years for thin film technologies to increase their share sizably. But they are here to stay.
Comment
4 of 23
May 4, 2007
The largest module First Solar offers is 67.5 watts which would mean you'd have to install 3 to 4 times as many modules as you would if you used the tried and proven silicon based modules. Cadmium, tellurium, copper, indium, gallium & selenium aren't elements that I would want to lay on in a beach setting unless they provided a HazMat shower at the location. Some of these experimental modules peak early and then derate rapidly over time, like a coffee buzz. Silicon will derate at a slower rate over time, like a healthy granola breakfast. For some reason or other everyone is blinded by the hype of the new & sexy rather than the proven technologies from manufacturer's that have been in the business for a long time and have great R&D departments as well as great tech support such as Sharp, Kyocera and BP.
Comment
5 of 23
May 4, 2007
There are at least six aspects which make a solar a good investment: No CO2 emissions, long term future growth world wide, free energy harvesting, helping people in developing nations have access to basic essentials like water pumping and electric lights, homeland security and energy independance. With that broad base of help to mankind and no downside byproducts, solar is a very good investment. Our company makes the electronics necessary to make PV modules useful and we support any advancement in thin film and all other technologies.
John Pfeifer
Apollo Solar
Comment
6 of 23
May 4, 2007
Some day thin film may "rule" but that day we feel is still at least 5 years off or more. Why? AS mentioned in last post cost and efficiency. They also have to provide the same warranties as silicone does. 25 years. The hype has not meant the reality. That said from an architectural point they are great, but you pay a premium for that look. The day that a;; roofs will have PV is coming. From all of us at beutilityfree.com.
Comment
7 of 23
May 4, 2007
"Produces the lowest cost power." Huh? We sell PV modules of all types and the UNISOLAR PV modules are twice the expense of silicone based modules on a watt per watt basis. Amorphous is 1/2 the efficiency of silicone cells so therefore you have to have TWICE the surface area to produce the exact same wattage. So this is why the amorphous solar modules simply have not "caught" on. Until they either get their efficiencies UP or the price DOWN silicone will still rule.
Comment
8 of 23
May 4, 2007
Using "rare" elements to produce thin film is a flawed strategy from the outset. Beyond this, the durability of thin film will always be in question..."thin and flexible" but will the tech ever be strong enough to endure hail strikes and extreme weather? Real world conditions require durability or numerous "re-applications" on roof tops.
Invest your money where the margins are going...the integrators and installers. We are past the boom for the "manufacturers". BP Solar's new product, "Integra", is perhaps the best innovation I have seen in the past year--not a thin film.
Comment
9 of 23
May 4, 2007
Didn't Shell Oil sell its silicon pv investments in order to focus on "thin film"? Does anyone recall which company they bought in order to get into the thin film game? I think they bought it out of bankruptcy.
It may be just pocket change for Shell, but it says a lot about the direction of the industry
Comment
10 of 23
May 4, 2007
What is really making me highly optimistic is that the vast amount of investing in production that solar deserves will increasingly make solar "investing" as a buying consumer more worthwhile. Exponential growth is pretty exciting.
Especially now, with that new disruptively-economic method of producing solar grade silicon at about 15% of recent-past costings for manufacturers.
It's not easy to wait. Putting power back into the grid at possibly far higher efficiencies, I would really like to see a home put 5 kilowatts of power into the grid for about $10,000. Now *that* would be breathtaking just to know you can "undo" large amounts of carbonization of the environment (hopefully coal generation, with coals' huge 200% rate of carbon-dioxide pollution compared to anything else)!
Dan Petit in Austin TX.
Comment
11 of 23
I do not think it is publically traded....NOBODY HAS EVEN HEARD OF IT !www.pyronsolar.comthat is where my mouth is, I pray somebody can put some money on it !

mather_2001jr@yahoo.com
Comment
12 of 23
May 4, 2007
I am sure thin film will equate to fat profits as we tap into solar energy.

Just wait for the next stage; thin film producing green hydrogen.

If you have a roof over your head you will be laughing all the way to the bank

Think ahead become a HYDROGENHEAD

Our future is with H. "tHe friendly element"

Mike H.
Comment
13 of 23
The reason why Thin Film will be the preferred choice because it offers the cost to efficiency advantage in comparison to siicon cells. Silicon cells have hardly any room left for cost reduction. Thin film efficiencies may currently be low but they offer enough scope for improvement. Beisded their flexible applicaiton in nature could be a boom.
Comment
14 of 23
May 6, 2007
Its easy to loose focus on someone when they wave a big banner with lots flash and color over their head. Your eyes are attracted to the banner waving back and forth more then the person.
Make no mistake, even though the PV industry is waving a banner of saving the world, they are doing it for money.
Comment
15 of 23
May 6, 2007
It would appear to me that, what has been going on within the PV industry is this.
Through the 70's, 80's, and 90's PV modules started out as; frameless, low wattage (about 64 or so,) with no J-boxes, and one year warranties at best and one could get all of this for around $400.
As time went on we started to see; higher wattage PV modules (100 watts) with frames, J-boxes, and 25 year warranties and all for around $400. to $450.
Prices seemed to be at there best from 97 to 02.

Now of course we will pay from $500. to $550. for that same module because of claimed shortages.
I foresee this same thing happening again. With the promise of new technologies in PV coming, the prices will not come down but it will appear that we are getting more for our money and then sometime after that the prices will go up even higher for some reason or other.
Could this happen a third time? Time will tell!
Comment
16 of 23
May 6, 2007
I'm not sure where Sliver cells fit in -they're crystalline silicon and thin without being a film. They are one example that shows that there still is room for Silicon cells to get much cheaper. Also improved methods for silicon production, with substantial cost reductions are around too, so I think it's premature to think silicon has reached it's full potential.
There are definitely other significant players in thin film than those mentioned - I think Nanosolar deserves a mention, with their initial manufacturing plant planned to produce 430MW of roll-printed CIGS each year.
PV has enormous potential but no clear and obvious winner has emerged - meaning there is still room for innovation, yet the massively huge investments ($10's and $1oo's of billions) needed to make it a Big player will wait on that clearly superior technology.
Comment
17 of 23
May 7, 2007
The story states thin film produces "more useable power per rated watt". Any real scientist out there know if this is true w/o concentration? If so, the higher spatial requirement is partially mitigated and thin film gets more interesting. It is kinda hard to believe there would be much difference and I'd have thought mono crystals would hands-down outproduce any thin film. If you have any non-marketing evidence, please let me know at axismail@verizon.net. Tks.
Comment
18 of 23
May 8, 2007
Well, some people on here think thin-film is still expensive and way out there still for being common place in the market. Also, some have stayed their durability to hail and what not. Thin- film CIGS you can shoot a bullet through and still produce energy the same as before...find a silicon panel that can do that! Uni-solar panels are expensive but they still use silicon so remember that. CIGS is the best option for there is good amounts of the materials needed and just because we may not understand the name doesnt mean it is toxic or rare. And, you will be seeing CIGS going mainstream to the marketplace in 2007 and 2008 so the idea that the technology is 5 years out is false.

Adam S. Malys
Comment
19 of 23
May 9, 2007
I think that XSUNX deserves to mentioned as a serious player in the PV field. Still in the early stage however, their POWER GLASS devolopment is for sure interesting as a "see trough" power source.

See for yourself at: xsunx.com

Jan Dyreby
Comment
20 of 23
May 13, 2007
Ron: shell sold their Si division. They held onto their thin film (CIS) division.
Comment
21 of 23
May 18, 2007
Our company is also very keen to enter in Solar energy. we are looking for the experts who can guide us in India for the manufacture of thin films a-Si modules for the same. It has very vast scope in our country and this is future source of green energy.
Comment
22 of 23
May 30, 2007
G GUPTA,

Suntech Power and Sinocome are building new large plants to produce the thin film solar panels in China, you may contact them to see whether they may help you.

http://solar-in-china.blogspot.com
Comment
23 of 23
December 29, 2007
Concentrated solar heating Stirling engines seems to be a more economical way to produce electricity, and does not need silicon. Just mirrors.

Comments please.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Peter Lynch

View Peter Lynch's Profile
About: I have worked, for 33 years as an independent analyst and investor in small emerging technology companies. I have been actively involved in following developmen... more »

Advertise With Us

Konica Minolta Sensing Americas, Inc Schletter Inc. AREDAY GoGreenSolar.com The Interstate Renewable Energy Council Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. Solmetric Corporation
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters