The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Monday, May 20, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

2007: The Year of the Thin Film PV Stock

J. Peter Lynch, Independent Wall Street Analyst
May 02, 2007  |  23 Comments

Wall Street is always looking for the next big thing. The market constantly seems to recognize a trend ahead of the general media and once the newspapers start to talk about a subject, many of the stronger public players in that field have already made significant moves. Nowhere in the renewable energy sectors has this been more apparent than with solar related stocks.

In 2005, solar stocks outperformed the average NASDAQ stock by an amazingly wide margin -- almost 100 fold greater. Certainly the solar sector of the market was the place to be in 2005. * Average Gain for US solar stocks in 2005 = +134% * NASDAQ Gain in 2005 = +1.37% Last year, 2006, was the beginning of a significant ramp up in solar financings and solar IPO's and more importantly, it marked the beginning of serious financial resources coming into the solar industry, which will allow the industry to continue and even expand its current robust growth. In fact, 2006 could be called, "The Year of the Solar IPO," with IPO companies coming from all points on the globe -- U.S., Europe and China. I see this surge in IPO's continuing in 2007 and beyond. This industry has incredible growth ahead of it and will need adequate funding to fuel its growth. With all of this booming growth and activity in 2005 and 2006, what is left for the current year? I think that 2007 may mark a very significant chapter in the history of the renewable energy industry -- the beginning of the transition from the current dominant technology, crystalline silicon, to the "next generation" photovoltaic (PV) technology -- thin film technologies. This year may well be the "Year of Thin Film Photovoltaics." Thin film technologies are various technologies that have been underdevelopment for the past 15 to 20 years and utilize very small amounts of specialized materials to create solar panels. These thin film panels have the potential to produce power significantly cheaper than today's standard silicon technology. The panels are usually made in the form of a monolithic piece of glass, upon which various thin films are deposited. A number of firms are also working on depositing various thin film materials on flexible substrates, such as stainless steel or plastic. Types of Thin Film Technology There are primarily three types of thin film technologies that have each been researched for over 15 years and are the current focus of the solar industry: Amorphous Silicon (a-Si); Cadmium Telluride (CdTe); Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (CIGS). Amorphous Silicon had the largest share of the thin film market (64%) as of the end of 2005. It has been researched for the longest period of time, may be the best understood material of the three and has been commercial for the longest. Cadmium Telluride had 26% share of the market and is ramping up very rapidly, with Copper Indium Gallium Selenide having a 10% share of the thin film market, with great potential, but is the least understood and least developed of the three materials. Advantages of thin film technologies over conventional crystalline silicon include: * Lower cost of production than conventional silicon processes. * Lower manufacturing facility cost per watt -- CapEx. * Uses far less material, than the amount used in standard silicon cells. * Lower energy payback -- amount of time until the product produces more energy than was utilized in its manufacture. * Produces more useable power per rated watt. * Superior performance in hot and overcast climates. * Ability to be attractively integrated into buildings -- Building Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV). * Produces the lowest cost power. Thin Film Publicly Traded Stocks There are a number of public companies that are working in the area of photovoltaic thin films. But the majority of these companies do not have thin film as their primary business. As a result, I will divide them into two groups: Thin Film Pure Plays. These are companies whose primary business is thin film photovoltaics Thin Film Related Companies. These are companies that have a division in thin film, an investment in a thin film development company or internal R&D focused on thin film. Pure Plays: * Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. -- NASDAQ -- symbol ASTI Material used: Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (CIG) * First Solar, Inc. - NASDAQ -- symbol FSLR Material used: Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) * Daystar Technologies, Inc. -- NASDAQ -- symbol DSTI Material used: Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (CIGS) * Power Film, Inc. -- London AIM Exchange -- symbol PFLM-L Material used: Amorphous Silicon (a-Si) Thin Film Related Companies: * Applied Materials, NASDAQ -- AMAT * Energy Conversion Devices, NASDAQ -- ENER * Ersol Solar Energy AG, Frankfurt Exchange -- ES6-F * Q-Cells, Frankfurt Exchange -- QCE-F * Solon AG Fuer Solartechnik, Frankfurt Exchange -- SOO1-F * Suntech, NYSE -- STP These are not all the companies in the world working on thin film technologies. However, they are some of the public companies that have made significant comments in their annual reports concerning their work in thin film and consider it to be a key part of their future expansion strategy. As a number of thin film technologies mature, I believe we will see many additional thin film pure plays, like First Solar (FSLR) going public to raise the necessary funding to expand their technology to address the booming worldwide PV marketplace. The future of distributed solar electric is rapidly approaching and it is called Thin Film Photovoltaics. J. Peter Lynch has worked, for 30 years as a Wall Street analyst, an independent equity analyst and private investor, and a merchant banker in small emerging technology companies. He has been actively involved in following developments in the renewable energy sector since 1977 and is regarded as an expert in this area. He is currently a financial and technology consultant to a number of companies. He can be reached via e-mail at Solarjpl@aol.com.

23 Comments

Register To Comment
Ronald Wagner
Ronald Wagner
December 29, 2007
Concentrated solar heating Stirling engines seems to be a more economical way to produce electricity, and does not need silicon. Just mirrors.

Comments please.
Dong Wang
Dong Wang
May 30, 2007
G GUPTA,

Suntech Power and Sinocome are building new large plants to produce the thin film solar panels in China, you may contact them to see whether they may help you.

http://solar-in-china.blogspot.com
G GUPTA
G GUPTA
May 18, 2007
Our company is also very keen to enter in Solar energy. we are looking for the experts who can guide us in India for the manufacture of thin films a-Si modules for the same. It has very vast scope in our country and this is future source of green energy.
Brian Julin
Brian Julin
May 13, 2007
Ron: shell sold their Si division. They held onto their thin film (CIS) division.
Jan Dyreby
Jan Dyreby
May 9, 2007
I think that XSUNX deserves to mentioned as a serious player in the PV field. Still in the early stage however, their POWER GLASS devolopment is for sure interesting as a "see trough" power source.

See for yourself at: xsunx.com

Jan Dyreby
Adam Malys
Adam Malys
May 8, 2007
Well, some people on here think thin-film is still expensive and way out there still for being common place in the market. Also, some have stayed their durability to hail and what not. Thin- film CIGS you can shoot a bullet through and still produce energy the same as before...find a silicon panel that can do that! Uni-solar panels are expensive but they still use silicon so remember that. CIGS is the best option for there is good amounts of the materials needed and just because we may not understand the name doesnt mean it is toxic or rare. And, you will be seeing CIGS going mainstream to the marketplace in 2007 and 2008 so the idea that the technology is 5 years out is false.

Adam S. Malys
Rich Barbarics
Rich Barbarics
May 7, 2007
The story states thin film produces "more useable power per rated watt". Any real scientist out there know if this is true w/o concentration? If so, the higher spatial requirement is partially mitigated and thin film gets more interesting. It is kinda hard to believe there would be much difference and I'd have thought mono crystals would hands-down outproduce any thin film. If you have any non-marketing evidence, please let me know at axismail@verizon.net. Tks.
Ken Fabos
Ken Fabos
May 6, 2007
I'm not sure where Sliver cells fit in -they're crystalline silicon and thin without being a film. They are one example that shows that there still is room for Silicon cells to get much cheaper. Also improved methods for silicon production, with substantial cost reductions are around too, so I think it's premature to think silicon has reached it's full potential.
There are definitely other significant players in thin film than those mentioned - I think Nanosolar deserves a mention, with their initial manufacturing plant planned to produce 430MW of roll-printed CIGS each year.
PV has enormous potential but no clear and obvious winner has emerged - meaning there is still room for innovation, yet the massively huge investments ($10's and $1oo's of billions) needed to make it a Big player will wait on that clearly superior technology.
Thomas Schmidt
Thomas Schmidt
May 6, 2007
It would appear to me that, what has been going on within the PV industry is this.
Through the 70's, 80's, and 90's PV modules started out as; frameless, low wattage (about 64 or so,) with no J-boxes, and one year warranties at best and one could get all of this for around $400.
As time went on we started to see; higher wattage PV modules (100 watts) with frames, J-boxes, and 25 year warranties and all for around $400. to $450.
Prices seemed to be at there best from 97 to 02.

Now of course we will pay from $500. to $550. for that same module because of claimed shortages.
I foresee this same thing happening again. With the promise of new technologies in PV coming, the prices will not come down but it will appear that we are getting more for our money and then sometime after that the prices will go up even higher for some reason or other.
Could this happen a third time? Time will tell!
Thomas Schmidt
Thomas Schmidt
May 6, 2007
Its easy to loose focus on someone when they wave a big banner with lots flash and color over their head. Your eyes are attracted to the banner waving back and forth more then the person.
Make no mistake, even though the PV industry is waving a banner of saving the world, they are doing it for money.
Jaideep Malaviya
Jaideep Malaviya
May 5, 2007
The reason why Thin Film will be the preferred choice because it offers the cost to efficiency advantage in comparison to siicon cells. Silicon cells have hardly any room left for cost reduction. Thin film efficiencies may currently be low but they offer enough scope for improvement. Beisded their flexible applicaiton in nature could be a boom.
Dan Petit
Dan Petit
May 4, 2007
What is really making me highly optimistic is that the vast amount of investing in production that solar deserves will increasingly make solar "investing" as a buying consumer more worthwhile. Exponential growth is pretty exciting.
Especially now, with that new disruptively-economic method of producing solar grade silicon at about 15% of recent-past costings for manufacturers.
It's not easy to wait. Putting power back into the grid at possibly far higher efficiencies, I would really like to see a home put 5 kilowatts of power into the grid for about $10,000. Now *that* would be breathtaking just to know you can "undo" large amounts of carbonization of the environment (hopefully coal generation, with coals' huge 200% rate of carbon-dioxide pollution compared to anything else)!
Dan Petit in Austin TX.
Michael Sanders
Michael Sanders
May 4, 2007
Didn't Shell Oil sell its silicon pv investments in order to focus on "thin film"? Does anyone recall which company they bought in order to get into the thin film game? I think they bought it out of bankruptcy.
It may be just pocket change for Shell, but it says a lot about the direction of the industry
Fred Widicus
Fred Widicus
May 4, 2007
Using "rare" elements to produce thin film is a flawed strategy from the outset. Beyond this, the durability of thin film will always be in question..."thin and flexible" but will the tech ever be strong enough to endure hail strikes and extreme weather? Real world conditions require durability or numerous "re-applications" on roof tops.
Invest your money where the margins are going...the integrators and installers. We are past the boom for the "manufacturers". BP Solar's new product, "Integra", is perhaps the best innovation I have seen in the past year--not a thin film.
John DAngelo
John DAngelo
May 4, 2007
"Produces the lowest cost power." Huh? We sell PV modules of all types and the UNISOLAR PV modules are twice the expense of silicone based modules on a watt per watt basis. Amorphous is 1/2 the efficiency of silicone cells so therefore you have to have TWICE the surface area to produce the exact same wattage. So this is why the amorphous solar modules simply have not "caught" on. Until they either get their efficiencies UP or the price DOWN silicone will still rule.
John DAngelo
John DAngelo
May 4, 2007
Some day thin film may "rule" but that day we feel is still at least 5 years off or more. Why? AS mentioned in last post cost and efficiency. They also have to provide the same warranties as silicone does. 25 years. The hype has not meant the reality. That said from an architectural point they are great, but you pay a premium for that look. The day that a;; roofs will have PV is coming. From all of us at beutilityfree.com.
John Pfeifer
John Pfeifer
May 4, 2007
There are at least six aspects which make a solar a good investment: No CO2 emissions, long term future growth world wide, free energy harvesting, helping people in developing nations have access to basic essentials like water pumping and electric lights, homeland security and energy independance. With that broad base of help to mankind and no downside byproducts, solar is a very good investment. Our company makes the electronics necessary to make PV modules useful and we support any advancement in thin film and all other technologies.
John Pfeifer
Apollo Solar
Guest User
Guest User
May 4, 2007
The largest module First Solar offers is 67.5 watts which would mean you'd have to install 3 to 4 times as many modules as you would if you used the tried and proven silicon based modules. Cadmium, tellurium, copper, indium, gallium & selenium aren't elements that I would want to lay on in a beach setting unless they provided a HazMat shower at the location. Some of these experimental modules peak early and then derate rapidly over time, like a coffee buzz. Silicon will derate at a slower rate over time, like a healthy granola breakfast. For some reason or other everyone is blinded by the hype of the new & sexy rather than the proven technologies from manufacturer's that have been in the business for a long time and have great R&D departments as well as great tech support such as Sharp, Kyocera and BP.
SURENDRA THIRUVAZANDUR
SURENDRA THIRUVAZANDUR
May 4, 2007
I am also of the view that thin film technologies will make steady inroads into the domain of crystalline Silicon technologies. a-Si or CdTe or CIGS. I would put my money on amorphous silicon (despite the Staebler Wronski effect) - on glass superstrate or stailess steel substrate or plastic substrate. In India a-Si modules have been successfully used for solar PV pumping applications (better high temperature characteristics, better spectral response and the ability to offer a better match to the pump (we had used a DC motor driven floating pump -centrifugal). True it may take another 5 years for thin film technologies to increase their share sizably. But they are here to stay.
Sore Bird
Sore Bird
May 4, 2007
Join the Grass Roots Program ...It is our duty to TELL them how to vote.

This site gives you all of your contact info by using your state and zip then allows you to sign a form letter or script your own letter, both methods on site, then the site emails you of the vote results and how your congressman voted, AWEA also informs you of upcoming votes so that you can remain on top of the issue.

http://www.awea.org/legislative/Grassroots.aspx

Please We must take the time and this method is just too fast and easy for excuses.
Ron Luikaart
Ron Luikaart
May 4, 2007
Michael- Shell sold their operation in Camarillo to Siemens. Judging from the comments, most people would like to invest in internet stocks (represented by First Solar & others) rather than Warren Buffet stocks (represented by Sharp, Kyocera & BP). Good luck with your investments.
Michael Halpin
Michael Halpin
May 4, 2007
I am sure thin film will equate to fat profits as we tap into solar energy.

Just wait for the next stage; thin film producing green hydrogen.

If you have a roof over your head you will be laughing all the way to the bank

Think ahead become a HYDROGENHEAD

Our future is with H. "tHe friendly element"

Mike H.
Phillip Mather, Jr.
Phillip Mather, Jr.
May 4, 2007
I do not think it is publically traded....NOBODY HAS EVEN HEARD OF IT !www.pyronsolar.comthat is where my mouth is, I pray somebody can put some money on it !

mather_2001jr@yahoo.com

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Peter Lynch

Peter Lynch

I have worked, for 33 years as an independent analyst and investor in small emerging technology companies. I have been actively involved in following developments in the renewable energy sector since 1977 and am regarded as an expert in...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 12
    Massachusetts Solar: Healthy Mix of Business Sense, Environmental Awareness and Public Engagement
  • 10
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Martifer Solar USA, Inc.
  • Renewable Energy World Asia
  • Renewables Academy AG (RENAC)
  • Met Office
  • Unirac, Inc.
  • Solar Wholesalers
  • Delta Rigging & Tools
  • Conergy Inc.
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information