Article Rating
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
Article Tools
Email This Story Share This Story Add to Bookmarks Printer Friendly Version 9 Comments
Article Tool Sponsor:

Learn More About Online Advertising with RenewableEnergyWorld.com

Producing Renewable Fuels From Renewable Energy

Published: April 23, 2007

Phoenix, Arizona [RenewableEnergyAccess.com] In the fall of 2008, XL Dairy Group, Inc. will begin operations at its Vicksburg, Arizona, facility as a self-contained biorefinery designed to produce high-grade ethanol, biodiesel, milk and dairy products, and animal feed -- along with 100% of the energy required to run the plant.

"Environmentally, the project has significant advantages because of low emission of greenhouse gases through the conversion of waste streams to energy and a high energy efficiency ratio. Simply put: as the only Biodiesel Refinery in the nation with this level of energy efficiency, we will not be energy dependent on fossil fuels and volatile energy markets."

-- Dennis Corderman, XL Dairy Group, chairman and CEO
The $260 million Vicksburg BioRefinery will use proprietary technology to generate ethanol with an energy efficiency ratio of 10:1. The ratio means that for every British Thermal Unit (Btu) unit of fossil fuel energy needed to produce ethanol and biodiesel, XL Dairy Group will produce 10 Btu units, nearly ten times the efficiency of a traditional dry-grind ethanol plant.

To achieve that efficiency, and generate cost savings of $0.30 to $0.35 per gallon in ethanol production and $0.50 cents per hundred weight of milk, the company will convert waste streams from the 7,500 dairy cows as well as from the fractionation, biodiesel and ethanol processes into energy to power the entire project with recycled, renewable energy.

Fractionation separates corn, the primary element in producing ethanol and biodiesel fuels, into three parts: germ, corn starch and corn bran.

"Environmentally, the project has significant advantages because of low emission of greenhouse gases through the conversion of waste streams to energy and a high energy efficiency ratio," said XL Dairy Group Chairman and CEO Dennis Corderman. "Simply put: as the only biodiesel refinery in the nation with this level of energy efficiency, we will not be energy dependent on fossil fuels and volatile energy markets."

Located 100 miles west of Phoenix in La Paz County, construction on the first phase of the Vicksburg BioRefinery dairy farm is complete. The Phase II Dairy will be constructed during 2007, and final engineering is now underway on the biofuels facility which includes the fractionation mill.

The project, said Corderman, will process over 576,000 tons of corn into 54 million gallons of ethanol, five million gallons of biodiesel and 110,000 tons of animal feeds annually.

Carbon dioxide produced during the process will be captured and stored on site for sale in various applications including beverage carbonation, cooling and the production of dry ice. Carbon dioxide, one of the major contributors to greenhouse gases and global warming, also can be "scrubbed" on site and converted into oxygen to be released into the atmosphere.

XL Dairy Group also is waiting for patent approval on a proprietary, low-cost algae production system, which will then be incorporated into the XL BioRefinery to lower operating costs and expand the production of motor fuels and animal feeds.

"Because algae has a higher oil content than corn, and needs much less acreage to produce much higher volumes, which we will do at the site, we expect to expand to 100 million gallons of ethanol and 25-30 million gallons of biodiesel over the next five years," added Corderman.
Additional Information
Previous Article
Next Article
Add Your Comment 9 Reader Comments
No image available
Comment
1 of 9
April 23, 2007
Sounds too good to be true. I suspect their idea of "energy ratio" is different from mine.

Their website, http://xldairygroup.com/ says "On-site energy production improves the energy ratio for ethanol to an outstanding 10:1, compared to 1.21:1 for typical ethanol plants."

Where you generate the energy and whether it's renewable or not, shouldn't change the fact that you are consuming that energy, so I don't see how it should change the energy ratio.
No image available
Comment
2 of 9
April 23, 2007
Sounds too good to be true. Where are they getting the corn. Arizona is bone dry!
No image available
Comment
3 of 9
April 24, 2007
Carolyn-

Our use of the phase "energy efficiency ratio" is not intended to display overall energy use or consumption, but to describe what is know in the energy industry as EROEI (Energy Returned On Energy Invested). EROEI decribes the number of BTUs produced relative to the BTU inputs required to produce them. This calculation takes into account all of the energy inputs required by the plant (growing and harvesting the corn, transportation, delivery, etc.) and relates them to the energy output of the plant in the form of ethanol. We will produce 10 units of energy in the form of ethanol for very 1 unit of energy utilized. This number is significant because the most efficient ethanol production facility in operation today only has an EROEI of 5 to 1, we are trying to state that by creating our own electricity and natural gas on-site, we will be displacing the same amount of fossil-based electricity and natural gas that would have had to have been purchased through a utility.
No image available
Comment
4 of 9
April 24, 2007
Darsun-

The project will be receiving its' corn from the Midwest via 110-car (unit) trains. You may be asking why we would do this...the simple answer is that the railroad systems in place today in the US are designed to haul corn more efficiently than they can haul ethanol. Since California is the biggest market for ethanol as an additive in the US, it makes more economic sense for us to bring the corn in by train and deliver the ethanol by truck than it does to locate near the corn supply and try to ship the ethanol by rail.
No image available
Comment
5 of 9
April 25, 2007
Our MANURE2ENERGYtm systems have the flexibility to add downstream processing of the liquid waste by bacteria that convert ammonia to nitrites, and remove sulphites.

Another downstream use being promoted by Vermont's bio-energy czar, is a new strain of algea which grow on the liquid waste media and are very oil rich...he won't tell me any details despite insistent questioning last week.

The Arizona project details need to be revealed? Is it a digester or does it use enzymes, or heat or ???? Process is everything...the only one I know of which converts everything is pyrolysis.
No image available
Comment
6 of 9
April 25, 2007
The future use of algae is very, VERY interesting.
And, while you appear to address the CO2 problem, where are you with regard to the phosphorous, ammonia and end waste product problems?
And, what does your (AD?) system do to result in clean air [little odor], reusable and clean water [removal of all pathogens] and clean fertilizer end product?
What else are you doing with the dairy wastes ?

Michael McCloud: who are you and what is your connection to XL Dairy; and how can you be reached?
No image available
Comment
7 of 9
April 25, 2007
In our study of anaerobic digestion for dairy wastes, we found a number of fascinating new "add on" technologies and efficiencies
Some AD systems used one or two techs, some more, most hardly any. The older the system in retain sales, the less technologically advanced they appear to be.
They could be made better, but are not.
Almost no AD system uses all of the technological advances that are currently available to them, and US.
While this system most certainly does appear to be very well advanced in the conversion of corn and dairy wastes into biodiesel, they do not mention the methane that will also be produced.
No image available
Comment
8 of 9
April 26, 2007
Wayne-
Yes, we will be scrubbing the biogas in order to use it in combined-cycle turbines to generate our electrical supply. We intend to initially market our CO2 for outside use but the ultimate goal is to utilize 100% of it in our proprietary algae propogation system. Our digested solids will be mixed with the ash from our solid-fuel boiler to create a marketable carbon-balanced compost that will be marketed to the deficient market in which we are located. 100% of the digested liquid will be retained on site (except evap.) and will be recycled for the dairy flush system and will ultimately support our algae system.
No image available
Comment
9 of 9
April 26, 2007
Michael

A very interesting project.

I assume you are using the methane generated in the biogas to heat the digester and fuel other processes as well as to generate on site power. If so, are you scrubbing the gas to strip out the H2S and seperate the CO2. I assume so in view of your comments re marketing the CO2.

What kind/s of generators are you using? Recips or turbines?

Do you use the digested solids as bedding or in the algae process, selling it as amendments, or ?

Are using the digested liquid to support the algae production?

Thanks.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
 
GlobalData Shanghai New Energy Industry Association Amonix Inc. Nikkei Business Publications America, Inc. FRONIUS USA LLC  Solar Electronics Division Valentin Software ORMAZABAL
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters