Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Cape Wind Makes Headlines with FEIR Approval

By Sara Parker, Staff Writer
April 3, 2007   |   8 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
8 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 8
April 3, 2007
You people just don't understand the Kennedy objection to the project.

As that Great American Hero Al Gore has shown us, our leaders (Kennedy, Gore, Bush, or Clintons) are far to important to suffer any inconvience. The mere fact that Ted might see the wind mill from his window is unacceptable.

In contrast, the peasants (that's you) have to be taxed and regulated into compliance, because your evil and destroying the globe.

That is the objection. Kennedy is important therefore no inconvience.
Comment
2 of 8
April 3, 2007
I think that Kennedy is simply afraid that it'll hurt the value of his property to have giant wind turbines "ruin" his ocean view.
Comment
3 of 8
April 3, 2007
The Mayflower

The Mayflower of our day,
Cape wind is here to stay,
Majestic as it crosses o're the sea,
Though "thwarted", "stalled", delayed,
By all the permit waves,
Will Plymouth Rock attain, set pilgrims free.

Yes energy release,
From winds that rarely cease,
That swiftly flow above the open sea,
The force to be controlled,
Be opened and enrolled,
As part of finest US history.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment
4 of 8
April 3, 2007
I don't understand Kennedy's argument against this project. He says it hasn't been reviewed enough and it might interfere with military operations. That's pretty bogus. Even if his real problem is that he could see the turbines from his house, miles offshore, he could not hear them and, IMHO, they are magnificent to look at. There are several huge turbines in the midwest next to major highways and I found myself having trouble concentrating on my driving as I stared and wondered at how much power they were producing.

I live right on the edge of federal forest service land and I would love to have some of these big turbines visible from my house, as long as they were distant enough that I couldn't hear them.

For my part, I'm putting my money where my mouth is with a 5.2KW solar array, and I'm now working on reducing our daily energy usage. http://www.zapsys.com/solarpanels.jpg
Comment
5 of 8
April 4, 2007
Green is the color of money. Cape Wind would benefit by taxpayer and ratepayer subsidies of $1 billion and tax sheltering. This isn't about public benefits.

The devil lives in the details of this project, including those in the state Secretary's Certificate on the FEIR.

The MMS, (page 7 of the Secretary's Certificate), provides the annual payment by Cape Wind for the control of 24 square miles of ocean, (15,360 Acres); for a 20 year term. As 640 Acres equals one square Mile, MMS has estimated a value of $16.28 per Acre, per year as payable to the public. Per month, Cape Wind would pay $1.36 per ocean Acre, with a 20 year term, in return for this priceless public resource, Nantucket Sound, in the special Cape Wind "no bid" deal.

Not all places are suitable for an industrial scale wind facility. We need to establish the ocean areas that are unsuitable; and observe established wind tower guidelines that reflect the wisdom of wind energy experience.
Comment
6 of 8
April 4, 2007
I am against this wind farm project but for a different reason. I would be in favor of it if it were 100% privately funded. This is another Big Dig or MBTA project being pushed by Big Labor whose last concern is the consumer. By the time this is complete, it will cost more for power from these wind turbines than by oil. Private funding yes and government funding out.
Comment
7 of 8
April 4, 2007
I don't understand the attitudes of some ... do the people of Holland dislike the windmills that have been lining there coast for decades ??? They too were placed there to provide a function! I can understand and appreciate the concern that some have to be able to looking out across natures untarnished and beautiful ocean. Then turn off the power that is causing us to need those windmills in the first place.
Comment
8 of 8
May 7, 2007
It's sad that people would oppose this.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Sara Parker

View Sara Parker's Profile
About: Sara Parker is a writer and poet based in New Hampshire. She holds a B.A. from Hampshire College with a concentration in creative writing. She has written for n... more »

Advertise With Us

Rich Hessler Solar Business Development Unirac, Inc. National Hydropower Association DNV KEMA Energy & Sustainability Prudent Living, Inc. AEG Power Solutions SolPowerPeople, Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters