Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Can a Solar Cell Ever Be 100% Efficient?

By Ken Sheinkopf
April 17, 2007   |   19 Comments

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

19 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 19
April 17, 2007
You are correct that 100% efficiency is probably never going to happen, however, you omit a very promising technology - GTRI 3D PV cells.

Optimally, I believe combining several methods such as multi-junction cells with 3D cells would be very efficient. Now all we have to do is not die of old age while the cost comes down. FAX machines used to cost $1,500. Efficent PV cells are expensive. To offset the costs somewhat, and encourage development, a cleaner environment, etc, the IRS and some States offer Solar Cell installation credits. In Australia, the gov't is considering legislation requiring utilities to pay premiums on pv derived electricity that is sold back into the grid by home owners. Makes sense. Some utilities charge a premium to users to ensure that the electricity they receive is from a renewable source.

Check out the link below.

http://www.nanowerk.com/news/newsid=1763.php
Comment
2 of 19
April 18, 2007
What is this nonsense? sure you can make a 100% efficient solar cell - it's just as easy as creating any other 100% efficient machine. ;)
Comment
3 of 19
April 18, 2007
At the present time, concentrated solar can increase efficiency to 39%...at least according to Pyron. Also Practical Instruments has these concentrated solar products. I'd like to know if these devices are reliable and practical.
Comment
4 of 19
April 18, 2007
I'd be interested in an expert opinion about a recent Georgia Tech announcement about "solar nano tubes" and their ability to substantially increase PV efficiency. Does this technology show promise for everyday usage, and are the claimed gains in efficiency believable?

Reference: http://gtresearchnews.gatech.edu/newsrelease/3d-solar.htm
Comment
5 of 19
April 18, 2007
PV's efficiency expectations have been unrealistically distorted by cold war thinking since its exception. In the mid 80's, Boeing was so blinded by its military-industrial complex status that they sold off both their wind turbine and PV units which I think are the seeds of both GE's wind program AND Spectrolab's current 40% efficiecy PV research.

In today's global warming world, it would seem that comparative insolation-electricity conversion studies should include paleo-energy efficiency awareness. While today's PV energy conversion ratio is up to 40% and production times are short, we forget that even direct photosynthesis is only 2-4% efficient and after eons of pressure, and human processing, the ultimate insolation/electricity conversion efficiency of stored hydrocarbons is probably on the order of 0.000001% over 100's of millions of years.

George Reynoldson
Comment
6 of 19
April 18, 2007
The question is irrelevant. No power conversion is 100% efficient. Since the source is free, it does not matter in the real world how efficient the conversion is. The real question is: When will the cost of a solar PV system be less than "traditional" power sources. My answer would be that it already is, were you to remove all govt. subsidies.

In order to supply my house with electricity, 40 miles of wire needed to be installed between my house and the nearest power plant, plus all the gadgets along the way to keep the voltage up. Plus building the power plant, plus mining the coal, plus transporting the coal. Even after dividing all that between all the houses, it's much more costly than my 5.2Kw PV system which needs no maintenance, transportation, mining, and only 200 feet of wiring.

http://www.zapsys.com/solarpanels.jpg
Comment
7 of 19
April 18, 2007
ATFQ! I like reading the diverse questions and answers on this site, but please answer the ... question. It still amazes me how many (if not most) folks don't understand the first law of thermodynamics, which for any "real world" system prevents 100% efficiency. There will always be some energy loss in transfering from one form to another. Going from 17% to 50% will be great. But you still have to account for practical problems like perfect orientation to the sun, aging of the materials, physical damage, keeping the windows clean, etc.
Comment
8 of 19
April 18, 2007
Ken is right. Only part of the solar spectra can be converted into electricity by any single semiconductor material. Multijunction cells can expand the usable spectra, but the price is a much higher cost, and the difficulty to match (and maintain) the curresnt of individual cells (the lowest individual cell current gives the multijunction cell current). Then you have a whole host of optical and electrical loses at the surface and inside the cell structure, that can never be completely eliminated. Efficiencies approaching 50% might become possible in a distant future; however, for the near forseable future (for terestrial applications) 20% is an achievable goal, and the semiconductor of choice will still be Si. The near term effort is toward reducing the cost/peak Watt, and this can be achieved to a level where the cost of a kWh will get close to that of a conventional power station.
Comment
9 of 19
April 19, 2007
1.45 Surface Reflectivity of glass can be
1.05-1.3 with the new black box nanotube coating
40% PV efficiency increase is achievable instantly.
PV Designers gotta get their head out of the silicone
Comment
10 of 19
April 20, 2007
Theoretical limits for solar cells? I have always wondered about it, but the answer above is not very informative. One commentator seems to indicate it is subject to the 2nd of thermodynamics, but that is only for heat engines. What we have here is a different mechanism. As far as I know you can make lower frequency photon devices very efficient like microwave. If so it applies to photons but obviously the material properties give rise to a whole set of different technical challenges. Getting there will not be easy and will no doubt be approached only under very special circumstances, but any knowledge gained will help greatly
Comment
11 of 19
April 20, 2007
One wonders whether it will eventually be direct solar cells, or solar thermophotovoltaics, which take the efficiency crown. There have been some papers trying to math out an upper bound on thermophotovoltaic efficiency, but it looks like those papers may not be held as doctrine by the MIT folks who have suggested they can get higher efficiencies than those projections.
Comment
12 of 19
April 20, 2007
Only a little more than 100 years ago people lived by oil and/or gas lamps and either walked or where carried around by horses or oxen.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

http://media.www.thetriangle.org/media/storage/paper689/news/2004/10/15/SciTech/Edison.Tesla.Competed.For.Acdc.Current.Monopoly-754734.shtml
Comment
13 of 19
I'll go along with Mircea. The complete solar spectrum cannot be harnessed (as of now). No device structure would be 100% efficient. In any case case, (absolute) efficiency varies over the day (efficiency averaged over the day vs peak efficiency). There is always the question of bulk semiconducor losses, series resistance losses, decreased shunt resistance at places (pin holes etc)and so on.
Comment
14 of 19
I fully agree with views expressed by Mr.Chuck Conover.
It is high time that bureaucrats and general public
all over the world should understand something simple
like this.
D.S.CHATHA
INDIA RENEWABLE ENERGY INC.
Comment
15 of 19
April 23, 2007
I think the important point here is the upper limit in efficiency that we can expect from PV technology today and in the future, and how it compares to other ways of harnesing energy from the sun. Perhaps PV/T will be the answer for some applications down the road...
Comment
16 of 19
May 2, 2007
I believe Mr. Bloom in his April 18th. comment was referring to the 'Second Law of Thermodynamics' which states: "In all energy exchanges, if no energy enters or leaves the system, the potential energy of the state will always be less than that of the initial state"
That said, I believe solar energy may have even more (than 40%)increased efficiency by utilizing CHP that is currently used in gas turbines, where heat is recovered and used for many other purposes than just generating electricity.
Comment
17 of 19
May 14, 2007
I'm with Chuck on this one.
Keep your eye on the ball.
Return on investment outweighs efficiency.
The light is free.

John Carr
"Solar Energy, Clean energy for the next 3 billion years"
Comment
18 of 19
May 14, 2007
<Enter your comment here>
Comment
19 of 19
July 30, 2007
<p>So what does 100% efficient even mean to you guys?&nbsp;</p><p>Is it when a&nbsp;PV module, a square meter in size, can produce 1000 Watts when exposed to 1000W/m2 irradiance at any temperature?&nbsp; </p><p>If not &quot;any temperature&quot;, because that rediculous, what would be the hottest cell temperature you would&nbsp;need it to be while still&nbsp;making that 1000W/m2 for you to consider it 100% efficient?</p><p>&nbsp;Lastly,&nbsp;I don't want the fact that PV is &quot;only 12 (or whatever) percent&quot; to continue to slow the growth of our industry&nbsp;by acting as a right wing spinnable &quot;fact &amp; figure.&quot; Most of us already have enough roofspace or real estate to&nbsp;offset at least a majority of the energy we&nbsp;require, efficiency really&nbsp;is only a discussion of production per area.&nbsp; We do not need to get hung up on efficiency, although improvements in that area would be great and are on thier way, we&nbsp;only need to&nbsp;install more of the&nbsp;technology we already have and we would be&nbsp;well on our way to solving many of our own problems.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

SolarNexus Renewables Academy AG (RENAC) Black & Veatch Corporation Comment:Visions KACO new energy, Inc. Rolls Battery Engineering US Solar Institute
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters