Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Analytical Testing of Biofuels Identifies Need for QA

April 4, 2007   |   2 Comments
Shimadzu Scientific's white paper helps researchers develop processes for standardization.

Do you like this research & reports?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
As biofuels continue to be pushed to the forefront of the energy market and the public's consciousness, there will be a growing need for accurate analytical evaluation of every part of the fuel manufacturing process. Continued refinements in methods and equipment will help insure quality products in the marketplace, which will, in turn, eliminate any potential stigmas or objections that remain in consumers' minds about these alternatives.

-- Summary from Overview of Biofuels
2 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 2
April 17, 2007
Robert, first of all if Cellulosic Ethanol from non-food supply feedstocks like switchgrass, woodchips, paper pulp, corn stover, sawdust, algae, etc. takes off like it is supposed to do then we won't have to worry about any conflict between the fuel and food industries.
As for Hydrogen, i'm just not sure. It has great potential, i agree, but cost isn't coming down fast enough, there is no infrastructure set up to handle it (i know the infrastructure can be more localized with on-site electrolysis of water with (hopefully) renewables), and Hydrogen is still dangerous to ship and store even if it is very safe in the cars themselves. I think the real answer will be fast recharging plug-in EVs with extended life batteries that are always getting better and then a hybrid engine kicking in when the battery runs out of juice. As for what powers the hybrid portion I think Hydrogen could be great there but cellulosic ethanol or biodiesel could work better.
Comment
2 of 2
April 26, 2007
Gentleman,
I am wondering if either of you have done any work on the site of two married German Physicists....1 000 or 1 400 patents between them. A solar/ hydrogen device the DOE said 37+ efficient BUT NO BODY WILL PUSH OR EVEN STUDY OR CRITICIZE www.pyronsolar.com

They used their own money to build the devise a REAL NO-NO IN THE USA...and as Physicists with 1400 patents they actually believe their superior science will sell the day ! Not in America, not today, we want to be sold a line of bull-_ _ _ t. Or make it to AMERICAN IDOL.....help us please Lord !mather_2001jr@yahoo.com
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Sharp Solar Energy Solutions Group ONTILITY Solar Training Sol Systems LLC MaRS Valentin Software, Inc - providing Solar Design Software Kipp & Zonen Biomass Thermal Energy Council (BTEC)
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters