Article Rating
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
Article Tools
Email This Story Share This Story Add to Bookmarks Printer Friendly Version 14 Comments
Article Tool Sponsor:

Learn More About Online Advertising with RenewableEnergyWorld.com

Sustainable Biodiesel: The Ecological Cost of Fuel

Published: February 13, 2007

San Antonio, Texas [RenewableEnergyAccess.com] Motivated to help the environment and support the American economy, many consumers of biodiesel go out of their way to get the fuel -- and pay a premium price for it. But what if, after all that effort, their biofuel contributed to deforestation in Asia, traveled across the globe using fossil fuels and actually encouraged global warming?

"Big biodiesel has a lot of questions that need to be addressed. We need to ensure that the implications of the product are sustainable. Labeling biodiesel produced sustainably allows consumers to decide where their money goes."

-- Rob Del Bueno, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, biodiesel made from virgin soybean oil is energy efficient, yielding 3.2 units of fuel energy for every 1 unit of fossil fuel energy used to produce it, while reducing lifecycle CO2 emissions by 78%. Soybeans, which grow well in the United States, produce about 50 gallons of oil per acre, while palm trees, with the most productive oil seed in the world, yield about 650 gallons per acre.

Because of these high oil yields, the biodiesel industry is now seeing rainforests cut down in places like Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand to grow palm oil for American and European biodiesel production. Rainforests are a carbon sink, constantly taking CO2 out of the atmosphere and releasing oxygen.

Biodiesel can prevent CO2 from being released into the atmosphere but, if the feedstock used is palm oil from formerly forested land, it would take over 100 years of biodiesel production to make up for the loss of the forest.

"The story on palm seems to be completely focused on the detriment it brings to our ecosphere and global populations. Doom and gloom... Palm oil will be coming to U.S. markets in the form of palm methyl-esters [biodiesel] whether we like it or not... [and] consumers must differentiate between 'good' palm and 'bad' palm," said Kevin Kuper of Whole Energy in Seattle. "If we can follow the lifecycle of one palm farm and decide that those products are worth an extra $0.15 [a gallon] over palm grown otherwise -- still nearly $1.00 less than U.S. domestic oil crop biodiesels -- and we follow our dollars back to schools and hospitals would it not be sustainable?"

The Sustainable Biodiesel Summit (SBS), in its fourth year and growing, attempted to bring the sustainability issue to the forefront last week. Originally a California-based group called the California Biodiesel Consumer Conference, the Sustainable Biodiesel Summit grew into a national movement when groups from North Carolina and Colorado began attending.

Focusing on feedstocks, fuel quality, energy efficient processing and small business modeling, the summit held in San Antonio, Texas, provided a place for like-minded members of the biodiesel industry and public to share innovations, best practices and address challenges.

"People feel isolated and crazy for doing biodiesel on a community scale," reflected SaraHope Smith, an organizer of the summit. "But coming here they can connect with other people who are doing community scale biodiesel and learn what they need to learn to make it happen. We are building a community across the country."

This year 130 people registered for the summit. Many are entrepreneurs like Rob Del Bueno from the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, who produces biodiesel on a small scale for customers including Emory University and Frankie Lind, a biodiesel producer and editor of biodieselSMARTER, a new print magazine written for biodiesel producers by biodiesel producers. But how can consumers tell if their biodiesel is made sustainably?

While the SBS devoted its wrap-up session to discussing industry standards for sustainability—and companies like Pacific Biodiesel are devoted to producing biodiesel sustainably and duplicating that model in other regions—the answer is that right now there is no easy way for consumers to know: people would have to trace back the fuel to the producer and from there find out where the feedstock came from, do some math, and then make a judgment call on what they consider sustainable. It would be arbitrary and way too much to ask of the public.

"Big biodiesel has a lot of questions that need to be addressed. We need to ensure that the implications of the product are sustainable. Labeling biodiesel produced sustainably allows consumers to decide where their money goes," said Del Bueno.

The Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance (SBA), a group that includes some famous faces like Daryl Hannah, Annie Nelson, wife of Willie Nelson, and Laura Louie, wife of Woody Harrelson, is developing ways to measure and market sustainable biodiesel practices.

The SBS will be meeting again at this year's Business Alliance for Local Living Economies (BALLE) conference on May 31 in Berkeley, California, and again before the National Biodiesel Board Conference in Orlando, Florida, next February. The SBS and SBA will be working throughout the year to develop sustainability standards for the biodiesel industry.

"Biodiesel can be made sustainably. Our whole lives can be re-made sustainably. We're kind of pioneering old, pre-fossil fuel territory from our current vantage point—and we need each other to figure out how to do it. The SBS supports us in creating that new model together—creating models for each other," said Smith.

Meghan Murphy is a founding member and now acting president of Ithaca Biodiesel, a worker-owned biodiesel cooperative in Ithaca, New York.


Previous Article
Next Article
Add Your Comment 14 Reader Comments
No image available
Comment
1 of 14
February 13, 2007
We should come up with rock-solid certifications if we want to really help the planet.
No image available
Comment
2 of 14
February 14, 2007
I stumbled upon this site www.palmoiltruthfoundation.com that discusses more about the use of palm oil as feedstock for biodiesel as well as the ecological implications.

As a whole, I agree that sustainable practices should be put into place and the RSPO has begun that process. In addition, certification has already been discussed and instituted. You can find out more info on the above site or at the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil or Malaysian Palm Oil Council websites.

Aside from its use in biodiesel, as Mr. Mazza has said, there is also a desire for a healthier food oil.

Perhaps if you examine the whole equation carefully, palm oil could possibly be more sustainable, higher yielding and environmentally friendly than say, corn or canola. Its plantations are, after all, planted forests, able to provide green cover and help with CO2 issues.
No image available
Comment
3 of 14
February 14, 2007
There are issues with palm acreage expansion in Indonesian rainforests and soy acreage expansion in Amazonia. Biodiesel is part of the picture. So, in the case of palm, is the desire for healthier food oil that does not have trans-fats, in the Brazil case, food demand. Since there are multiple pressures, it seems what is really needed are firmly enforced rainforest preserves, and since this means foregone economic development, will probably require some direct economic support for the rich countries. This could perhaps happen through a post-Kyoto global carbon reserve program.
Comment
4 of 14
February 14, 2007
In a world where many are already starving, we should not be burning food for transportation.

In a country that uses twice as much energy per unit of production than Europe and Japan, we should focus on efficiency before burning food for transportation.

In communities that should be focusing on re-localization in preparation for the coming energy decline, we should not be trading one 6,000-mile supply line for another.

Biodiesel from waste oil is great; any other feedstock must be carefully evaluated for its true impact.
No image available
Comment
5 of 14
February 14, 2007
It makes me uneasy to see RenewableEnergyAccess contributing to the U.S. food-to-fuel fraud by publishing this rah-rah industry crapola. As a people, we desperately need to implement REAL renewable energy solutions - not to allow ourselves to be sidetracked by scams on taxpayers foisted by ignorant politicians and criminal handouts to big agriculture. See slide 51 http://www.agroecology.wisc.edu/fall_seminars/corn_ethanol/PatzekPPT.pdf
No image available
Comment
6 of 14
February 14, 2007
Yes, microalgae should be part of community biodiesel efforts. Yes, new heat engines are coming that will run off of indirect solar energy in the air above a certain speed and temperature, using the radiator as an evaporator for expanding ammonia that expands thru a low-temp composite rotary expander-condenser to make shaft power with no need for transmission on a straight-torque variable-speed design- light weight and no fuel use in summer except to pass...
No image available
Comment
7 of 14
February 14, 2007
Sebastian T; Certifications are not the answer. Making businesses fiscally responsible and force them to pay the actual clean up for the ecological destruction they cause is!
No carbon trading, No Rain forest certificate purchases just plain old hard environmentally correct work!

D~W
No image available
Comment
8 of 14
February 14, 2007
For the interested reader, the source of the sudden discussion around palmoil comes from a report on wetlands (www.wetlands.org), published in Dec 2006. Although palm plantages are one important cause for the disappearnce of these wetlands, which leads to large CO2 emissions, timber and other crop land needs are other reasons.

But even when we manage to certify biofuels properly, we should stop thinking we all can continue to drive happily in SUVs and other over powered cars. There will just not be enough biofuels for 1 Billion cars worldwide. The quicker, and long term more sustainable way to go is to move to cars that consume factors less per mile than they do today. This possibility exists now, but consumers habits need to change and it should become fashionable to impress with cars that are fuel-economic rather than big and powerful.

Reynier Funke
No image available
Comment
9 of 14
February 18, 2007
Free market would be the best mechanism anyway. Just set a certain limit of CO2 emission for every country and auction the rights to it. Its interesting how its not possible to auction CO2 rights, but no problem to auction rights for wavelengths of mobile telecommunication. Then reduce the CO2 emissions up for auction each year.
Yes, energy might become more expensive, but when I look at the unused possibilities of energy efficiency out there, it obviously is MUCH too cheap at the moment.

Cheers, Guido
No image available
Comment
10 of 14
February 18, 2007
I still dont see how biogas/biofuel can be seen as even a part of a solution. Its only ok, if its from biowaste and then its great.
But by definition energy from waste can never cover a big part of our energy needs. Since it can only convert back a part of the energy that was used in the first place and NOT used as part of the product.
Other than waste: even if you dont destroy a forest, there are two possibilities.
1) There already is enough food for everybody:
then the area should be converted back to its natural state/forest, which it was once before humans. Thereby it would yield badly needed environmental services from storing CO2, to cleaning air and providing habitat for animals.
2) As long as there is not enough food for everybody: using big plantations to make a quite inefficient fuel, is just plain unethical in my opinion and on top of that would never surivive any kind of free market.
No image available
Comment
11 of 14
February 19, 2007
I really cannot understand how the article fanagles the numbers. True, rainforests or any forest for that matter acts as a carbon sink--to a certain point. Trees absorb the most CO2 for the atmosphere during their "fast grwoth" yrs. As old trees die and fall they gradually release the CO2 to the atmosphere. Palm tree once they get past their fst growth stage continue to absorb CO2 and continue to convert it into palm kernels. Unfornately scientists can never be economists. Lets be honest for yrs we hear "don't destroy the rainforest." To all those people I say OK lets divert 25% of your pre-tax salary to the people in the amazon and other places so you can help subsidize imported beef (cannot grow feed if you cannot thin the forest) and let them have a livable income (b/c the nice rainforest is not providing them with much income)
No image available
Comment
12 of 14
February 23, 2007
i see a problem even with turning "waste" into biomass/biofuels because man's idea of "waste" is mother nature's idea of "replenish".
i am growing perennial miscanthus G on marginal lands on my farm with the idea of using the high btu value stalk each fall, but still worry about the taketaketake. using less energy is more effective than growing more, more, more.
i make and run on wvo biodiesel, but i "run" many fewer miles a week than i used to.
No image available
Comment
13 of 14
March 6, 2007
We, EcoEnergy of Bolivia are supporting a project in northern Bolivia, Pando, which is a tropical zone with 30,000 hectares of already deforested lands (in the 60's for cattle grazing before environmental standards) using Sugar cane and African Palm for ethanol and biodiesel respectively. We are currently seeking funders for the project, and have completed pre-feasibility studies as well as developed alliances with the communities and industries in the region for support.

I would like to know how we could register the project some how as a "sustainable" use of African Palm under this new group.

Just for a brief background, the region uses 100% imported diesel fuel for electricity generation due to its isolation, has a 72% poverty rate and high unemployment rate, and borders Brazil, a huge market for both ethanol and biodiesel.

Please send any information you may find useful our way.
Jeff
jcramer@quipusbolivia.org
No image available
Comment
14 of 14
May 9, 2007
What happened to Jim Miller's earlier comment,as well as, my own? Are references to algae eliminated from the comments?
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
 
Intertek Alteris Renewables HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C. Solar Nation EFD Photovoltaics World Comdel
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters