Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Pelosi Supports Important U.S. Solar and Fuel Cell Bill

By Stephen Lacey, Staff Writer
February 28, 2007   |   9 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"Speaker Pelosi stressed the need to work across party lines for long-term support of solar and other renewables. She was especially supportive of H.R. 550, which will do great things for the solar industry."

-- David Hochschild, PV Now, Executive Director
9 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 9
March 1, 2007
I am shocked that the cap on the residential SOLAR THERMAL tax credit is not being removed!

Our solar thermal industry really needs to get organized so that they get a political voice. As it seems SEIA is not interested.

Solar thermal can offset significant natural gas usage... this is badly needed at a time when our president wants more liquified natural gas ports - so we can become addicted to (imported) natural gas.
Comment
2 of 9
March 2, 2007
Its Refreshing to see wide acceptance of the need to encourage renewable energy development and application. I am seeking to learn which domestic companies are producing renewable energy products for dealers who seek to install the systems for the public. In seeking to re-enter the market, I have had difficulty in this area.

JerryCheesman@yahoo.com
Comment
3 of 9
March 2, 2007
That's the only thing you'd add? This is a good start, but the U.S needs to be more aggressive in supporting renewable energy until we get to a point where ALL new housing units can support 100% of their energy needs, just like 100% of current housing units have bathrooms.

As of July 2001, there were 118M housing units. $10K per housing unit would be a good start. Too much? So far, the useless war in Iraq has cost us $3500 per housing unit.
Comment
4 of 9
March 2, 2007
The only thing I would add to this or other bills is a provision that Utility Companies buy-back excess electricity from their PV customers - even if it's at the wholesale rate. The present credit limit of 100% of the past 12 month total, needlessly discourages new PV owners from installing anything near 100% of their usage.
Comment
5 of 9
March 2, 2007
This is a good step, but we should expand it to include a ITC for the additional cost of the electrical components for Plugin Hybrid Electric Vehicles.

This would greatly reduce CO2 and offset costs in generating vehicular fuel (electricity). This also could aid in storing energy from any irregular renewable power for later use. It would reduce the need for new non renewable power if equipment subject to this ITC had a requirement to support vehicle to grid capablities.
Comment
6 of 9
March 2, 2007
Now is the time; write your federal reps and get all your friends and customers to do the same. Flood Congress with support for this bill and let's get it done once and for all. Now is the time for the US to become the WORLD LEADER in clean SOLAR ENERGY.
Green is the new GOLD!
Comment
7 of 9
March 2, 2007
You should not be too shocked by that fact...the $2000 cap is quite reasonable for warm climates where 4-person systems might cost $4000-5000. Adding to the % would make more sense but adding another $1000 on to the cap for indirect (glycol) systems that are needed in colder parts of the US would be worth considering.
Unfortunately Nancy knows very little about the cost basis of solar thermal and the numerous types of solar thermal systems...if she knew all this should would be neglecting her other responsibilities--not being critical, just factual.
btw-the boost this bill would give to PV would be incredible.
Comment
8 of 9
March 2, 2007
Though I'm all for supporting renewable energy, I hate to see legislation that is specifically directed at specific approaches that may not turn out to be the best. Geothermal heat pumps, for example, might be much more productive than fuel cells, for example.
Comment
9 of 9
March 3, 2007
At a bear minimum the following should be enacted by our government:

1. Establish a matching rebate program with an immediate and direct one time cash payment of up to 25 thousand dollars.
2. Require all Public (and Private) Service Utilities throughout the nation to conform to uniform rules and procedures for payment of excess generated clean energy by anyone desiring to be connected to the grid.
3. No form of taxation what so ever be levied against payment received by homeowners, at any level of government. To do so would, in itself, be a devastating blow to consumer incentive (and confidence in our system).
4. At present, only electric generating renewable systems, connected to the grid, should be considered.
Consumer investment is the only practical approach. (Note: Due to the limitation on space here, I urge each and everyone who reads this, send me your e-mail address for further details. My e-mail: walter_e_riley@yahoo.com. We need to help each other. Gov't wont!
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

AltEnergyStocks SolPowerPeople, Inc. SCHOTT Solar PV, Inc. Sharp Solar Energy Solutions Group Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc. Valentin Software, Inc - providing Solar Design Software Westinghouse Solar
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters