Article Rating
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
Article Tools
Email This Story Share This Story Add to Bookmarks Printer Friendly Version 11 Comments
Article Tool Sponsor:

Learn More About Online Advertising with RenewableEnergyWorld.com

Turning Switchgrass into Low Cost Ethanol

University of Rhode Island scientist aims to genetically modify switchgrass and produce 100% ethanol for less than $1 per gallon.
Published: December 6, 2006

Kingston, Rhode Island [RenewableEnergyAccess.com] In his 2006 State of the Union address, President Bush acknowledged the potential for switchgrass as a source of ethanol to reduce the nation's reliance on foreign oil. According to Albert Kausch, a University of Rhode Island (URI) plant geneticist on the cutting edge of switchgrass research, native switchgrass grown commercially today could produce ethanol for approximately $2.70 per gallon -- but by genetically improving a number of plant traits the production price could get as low as $1 per gallon.

"That's a key concern with using corn for ethanol because some of the genes being engineered into corn to make it a better source of ethanol aren't genes we want in the food chain. And without confinement, such as plant sterility, those genes could find their way into the corn that we eat."

-- Albert Kausch, University of Rhode Island, plant geneticist
"There are several impediments to the process of converting switchgrass to ethanol that would make unaltered switchgrass commercially unprofitable. We are working with professors at Brown University, for instance, to create better enzymes that will degrade cellulose into sugars for a more efficient conversion to ethanol," said Kausch.

An expert on "gene confinement," Kausch has spent 20 years genetically modifying a variety of turf grasses, rice and corn, and is now working to create a switchgrass that does not flower or reproduce -- ensuring that the genetically modified organisms do not escape into the environment and affect wild switchgrass.

"That's a key concern with using corn for ethanol because some of the genes being engineered into corn to make it a better source of ethanol aren't genes we want in the food chain. And without confinement, such as plant sterility, those genes could find their way into the corn that we eat," said Kausch, who launched Project Golden Switchgrass at URI.

He noted that sterile plants which do not use their energy to produce flowers will produce more biomass in the form of leaves and plant material and, ultimately, create more ethanol.

Unlike corn, which is currently used for ethanol production, switchgrass can be grown on marginal soils, is useful as wildlife habitat, and requires little use of fertilizers, insecticides or irrigation. In addition, switchgrass is a perennial plant and doesn't require replanting year after year.

"Switchgrass is a native plant of the tall grass prairies. It grows 12 feet tall in one season and produces 10 tons of plant material an acre, more biomass per year than most other plants," said Kausch. "I'm confident my lab can make it produce 20 tons an acre using the tools and personnel we have right now."

Along with genetically engineering switchgrass that is both sterile and resistant to herbicides, Kausch has a long list of other traits he hopes to improve as well, including drought tolerance, salt tolerance and cold tolerance.

Despite having studied corn for many years, Kausch believes it may not be best choice for ethanol production.

"Some critics argue that there is not enough good quality arable land available to grow the amount of corn required for biofuels, and all that we produce now is used for food instead of fuel," he said. "Corn is also very expensive to grow compared to switchgrass."

Since a majority of the carbon dioxide emissions that cause global warming come from transportation sources, Kausch believes that switching from gasoline to 100 percent ethanol is an important step toward halting climate change.

"It won't entirely solve the problem, but it sure will help," said Kausch. "And the reduced CO2 that comes from your tailpipe is then absorbed by the plants that are then turned into ethanol again, so it becomes a natural cycle."

Kausch expects to have test plots of the genetically modified switchgrass plants on the URI campus within two years, and hopes the first varieties will be in commercial production by 2011.
Previous Article
Next Article
Add Your Comment 11 Reader Comments
No image available
Comment
1 of 11
December 6, 2006
Got a good idea for these guys: dried switchgrass can burn, right? We have the technology to turn this stuff into electricity right now and transporting those electrons to the end user is a lot more efficient than breaking up the cellulose with expensive enzymes, fermenting the products and then distilling the 10% ethanol from the fermentation process. We had electric cars 10 years ago and they're coming back! Look at Tesla, phoenix motorcars, and AC propulsion. Couple electric cars that have 3x efficiency of gasoline cars (at point of use...) with Vehicle to Grid (V2G) and there's your renewable storage problems solved along with oil imports and a lot of CO2 not going into the air!
No image available
Comment
2 of 11
December 6, 2006
It's guys like this I hope to see mentioned in history books. They are as important as the 1st "discoveries" that came up with the pollution in the 1st place.
No image available
Comment
3 of 11
December 8, 2006
"TODAY" "NOW" IT IS POSSIBLE TO CONVERT SWITCH GRASS AND OTHER BIOMASS INTO LIQUID FUELS @ 110 TO 120 GALLONS / DRY TON OF BIOMASS (GRASS). STEAM REFORMING TO MAKE SYNGAS AND CATALYTIC CONVERSION TO PRODUCE THE FUELS (METHANOL OR ETHANOL OR DME OR EVEN GASOLINE). THE TECHNOLOGY AND COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS ALREADY EXIST. ALL THAT IS NECESSARY IS TO INTEGRATE STEAM REFORMING WITH CATALYTIC CONVERSION. WHY IS OUR GOVERNMENT SPENDING HUNDERDS OF MILLIONS TO DEVELOP NEW TECHNOLOGY WHEN THE COMMERCIAL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION ALREADY EXIST.
No image available
Comment
4 of 11
December 8, 2006
Agreed, The most important thing we must do is focus on conservation. We need to at least double the MPG of our vehical fleets, use more hybrid technologies. Then we have a better chance of relying on biofuels in the first place.
No image available
Comment
5 of 11
December 8, 2006
The genetic engineering to create another mono-culture crop is unecessary...$2.70 a gallon is good enough...
We also should be exploring how to increase diversity of prennial polycutlures of prairie grass plants and harvesting them to make liquid energy. Finally, lets all recognize that plant based liquid energy is only going to get us a small % ~ 10-15% of our needs and the conservation is where more resources need to go.. and diverse sources of energy are promoted.
No image available
Comment
6 of 11
December 8, 2006
Based on conversations I had with farmers that have actually planted switchgrass, I would disagree with the assertion in the article that switch grass provides good wildlife habitat. It is so dense that wildlife cannot move through or nest in it easily.
No image available
Comment
7 of 11
December 8, 2006
there are a few reasons one cannot just burn the switchgrass.
first, one has to fully dry it, which costs money and time and land.
second is the fact that grass doesnt burn very well, leaving alot of BTU's to go right up the shoot.
third is that there is alot of NOx in biomass buring vs coal, so its a pollution of a different kind.
4th is that the ash that is made from burning biomass is just as much a problem as the coal slag.
and 5th and most important, ethanol is for transportation fuels and thus, commands a better return on investment than to try and compete with coal for electricity.

but with all that said, the ideal that cellulose is going to run our energy economy is dead on correct. this will happen, just a matter of time.
No image available
Comment
8 of 11
December 8, 2006

In the 1930's the Henry Ford saw a future in biomass fuels. Ford operated a successful biomass conversion plant in Michigan, which included 12 acres of
industrial hemp fields cultivated for R & D.



The true power of industrial hemp will only be unlocked when we're able to use it to challenge large-scale, environmentally-damaging industries, and this isn't happening yet. Some would rather leave the issue of hemp alone. With such a valuable commodity, (probably the only biomass resource capable of making America energy independent), many positive changes could be put in place from which we could all benefit. The battle to get this recognized still needs to be fought.



See: href="http://www.pleiades-enterprises.bigstep.com/generic178.html">Hemp 4 Fuel
- New Energy News.


No image available
Comment
9 of 11
December 10, 2006
"Since a majority of the carbon dioxide emissions that cause global warming come from transportation sources,"...

Last time I checked, transportation only made up 13.5% of global CO2 emissions: 9.9% for road, 1.6% for air and 2.3% for rail, shipping and other (from the World Resources Institute).
No image available
Comment
10 of 11
December 15, 2006
"I'm confident my lab can make it produce 20 tons an acre using the tools and personnel we have right now."

ah yes but they didn't say their timeline for doubling yields. It just may happen only at 1-1.5% gain per year which is the same as convetional crop breeding programs. But it was a great cutline for the reporter.
No image available
Comment
11 of 11
December 27, 2006
If anyone has ideas that are better for utilizing switch grass as a fuel for cellulosic or biomass i am interested in learning more about what you have to say.
Especially Mr. Dozier. My e-mail is gregpavo@yahoo.com
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
 
Blue Sky Energy, Inc. Intersolar ET Solar Group American Electric Technologies, Inc. (AETI) Canadian Solar Inc. Spire Corporation Amonix Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters