Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Solar Cell Breaks the 40% Efficiency Barrier

December 7, 2006   |   30 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"The excellent performance of these materials hints at still higher efficiency in future solar cells."

-- Dr. Richard R. King, Spectrolab, principal investigator
30 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 30
December 7, 2006
One sun insolation means no concentration. So, with concentration, the "footprint" area for the solar collection panel does not change, but rather the number and area of the solar cells within the device. Concentration allows the devices to be potentially less expensive for the same output wattage. Increaseing the effciency of conversion from photon energy (solar) to electric energy will allow solar electric panels to deliver more watts per square foot. Efficiency of 40.7% through the use of multijunction cells is a great achievement! Now, the test will be the reality of the claim at $3.00/watt installed and $0.08-0.10/kwh in operation.
Comment
2 of 30
December 7, 2006
I wonder if these panels occupy the same footprint as conventional panels. The concentrator concept sounds like a telescope in that the larger the diameter the more light grasp there is.

George Dongarra III
Comment
3 of 30
December 7, 2006
Wow... Amazing!
Comment
4 of 30
December 8, 2006
Scott: google the menova "power spar"
Comment
5 of 30
December 8, 2006
A number of the units that use mirrors to concentrate heat for thermal power generation look much the same as the solar concentrator mirrors on the Spectrolab website. Does anyone know whether enough waste heat is generating to allow for a co-gen type application?

Does the $0.08 to $0.10 per kwh estimate already allow for any energy recovery from the coolant?
Comment
6 of 30
December 8, 2006
This is great news. Now solar electric power generation systems can be financed with 100% equipment financing, including shipping, installation and maintenance contract, with amortization over 20 years.
Comment
7 of 30
December 8, 2006
Yeah, where are the 30%ers available. Current real world installations operate in the 10-15% range. Promises promises
Comment
8 of 30
December 8, 2006
This is great news for the the sunny underdeveloped regions of the world!! Lets hurry to make it available.
Comment
9 of 30
December 8, 2006
"In 1994, DOE's National Renewable Energy laboratory broke the 30 percent barrier, which attracted interest from the space industry."

1994? where are these commercially available?
Comment
10 of 30
December 8, 2006
I wonder how long it would take the cell to recover all the energy that was used in its manufacture ?
Comment
11 of 30
December 8, 2006
Is the concentrator a separate device ? or is it simply a transparent lens film with magnifying capabilities covering the cell surface ?
Comment
12 of 30
December 8, 2006
Amazing....a really big step on our way to a full renewable and sustainable world. But what about the footstep? When will it be available?

Please inform me about it.
Martin@idet.nl
www.idet.nl
Comment
13 of 30
December 8, 2006
A revolutionary development, if true. Bravo! The article does not say how long before the cells will be widely available.
Comment
14 of 30
December 8, 2006
In Australia VERY serious plans are being carried out, heavily funded by State and Victoria itself, for a 154 MWp HCPV plant employing these fascinating multi-junction cells. It can be split in several parks, to avoid "visual impact". They have huge plans for this kind of solar plants Down Under.

Original site: http://www.solarsystems.com.au/154MWVictorianProject.html

Extensive abstract (Dutch) with links: http://www.polderpv.nl/HCPV_154MWp_plant.htm

It's really amazing how fast development is going, but, off course, this is all a necessity in times of energy crises.
Comment
15 of 30
December 9, 2006
OOOOhhh....Yes, that was my dream about 15 years ago when I was writting my Ph.D thesis. I hope, we are not very far from a fully renewable and pollution free world. This is a great news for the underdeveloped countries of the world where they have plenty of sunshine through out the year.
Comment
16 of 30
December 9, 2006
Dont' get overexcited - first, such cells are very colour sensitive and the if the efficiency is tuned to 40% for a noon sun, it won't be that close to 40 before 9 am or after 3 pm because the colour of the sun changes with elevation - second the 40% is measured with the cell at 25C and achieving this in a real installation is not easy with say a 40C ambient - three the cost of the concentrator is not small and it has to be steered very accurately and work reliably for 20+ years to be effective. If concentrator PVs were so much better than flat plate PV, they would be everywhere, and they aren't.
Comment
17 of 30
December 10, 2006
(Or maybe I should have read better -- the article does seem to hint the figure is for a concentrator, not single-sun cell.)
Comment
18 of 30
December 10, 2006
Steve: people are assuming that the efficiency figure is at > 1 sun because that's how the previous record breaker (also junction cell) achieved it's efficiency figure. That they are not is significant. I wonder whether these cells also get more efficient at higher insolation levels or not.
Comment
19 of 30
December 10, 2006
What are people on about with "conentrators"?

As I understand the story the improvement has been achieved mostly by utilizing a wider light spectrum than at present to generate the electricity, presumably by combining compatible photo-voltaic materials which have different spectral peak outputs; or have I missed something?
Comment
20 of 30
December 14, 2006
We've been promised >$4/watt installed before (First Solar) and have yet to see that. It's good to hear about 40% efficiency but the truth is in the production line. When we see even 30% coming off the line - then we can rejoice.

SonLight Power is accomplishing good things in developing countries now for those who are looking to aid that effort, feel free to join in.
Comment
21 of 30
December 19, 2006
You notice that multi-junction panels designed in 94' have NEVER hit the consumer market. The oil companies have bought-out every PV manufacturer they can so as to control the PV market. Right now, they sit around the big mahogany table- designing strategies to make sure 40% panels are available only to the military and NASA....at prices which keep their profits maximal. We will still pay for them, we just won't get to use them. Every year we hear about efficiency breakthroughs - and we are still using 15% panels. As long as the administration is in the oil business, this will continue.
Comment
22 of 30
January 2, 2007
Question: how much more silicon is used to produce these multi-junction panels vs. the panels that are on the market today? As we know there is a serious shortage of silicon wafer for use in assembling solar panels, so a panel that is twice as efficient but uses twice the silicon is not necessarily an improvement given the scarcity. For this to impress me it has to produce twice as much with significantly less than twice the silicon. Anyone know about this? I am no expert but this is what came to mind while reasing...
Comment
23 of 30
January 3, 2007
Due to the design being a multi-layer. To produce these extra layer requires additional steps in manufacturing. Additional manufacturing steps increase the cost of the solar cells. The real question is. Can the increased efficiace offset, the increased production cost? To make the product cost effective.
They use mirrors to concentrate more light on the cells in order to increase the output. The problem with concentraters is that the solar cells will run hotter, and excesive heat will age the cells faster. So a active cooling system may be required. More cost.
Comment
24 of 30
40.7% cell efficiency is no doubt 'path breaking', indeed. Well done. But how would this translate to efficiencies at the module level ? Other questions would be: Upscalability ? Yields in the production line ? Sun Tracking and cooling ? How many sun concentration are we talking about ?
Comment
25 of 30
May 5, 2007
Organic or plastic PV cells achieve now around 6% yields
and are probably 10 times less expensive to produce?
Isn't this the way to throw the dice?
Comment
26 of 30
May 30, 2007
The goal is to increase the efficiency of the solar panel and reduce the cost. But it should also be available to the consumer.
Where and when can the consumer purchase a 40% efficiency solar panel and at what price.
I understand that R&D is subsidized by the government, therefore the consumer has a right to the new technology.
Jay Draiman, Northridge, CA
Comment
27 of 30
October 25, 2007
I've been waiting to jump on the solar bandwagon. For 40% efficiency I could become a net producer of electricity, and sell my power back to the grid to finance its installation.
Comment
28 of 30
July 13, 2008
What I want to know is how much does this new solar cell cost?And how much did the ones from about 2003 cost?
Comment
29 of 30
December 7, 2008
I am interested in building solar panels as a hobbist, does anybody have any information, tips, help, they would be willing to share. also i would accept any donations of materials... there is a lack companies providing this technology in my area, and what is, is grossly overpriced.
Comment
30 of 30
December 23, 2008
I'm a solar installer operating along the US Gulf Coast. New solar panel tech focuses on either A) cost-effective panels using non-traditional materials that increase surface area requirements or B) more expensive panels optimizing efficiency, decreasing surface area requirements.

These trends meet different applications. A two story house has different energy needs and installation space than an office building. There is no magic bullet panel for the industry - rather the industry is developing and panels now need to be selected per application.

Depending on your local subsidies, waiting for prices to fall may penalize you financially. The industry is driving panel prices to a point where subsidies are not necessary, known as "grid-parity". Limited, subsidized markets exist today where the homeowner can get panels installed for less than "grid parity" prices. These programs will disappear as more cost effective panels hit the market.

Be careful when choosing an installer! Even the largest installation companies can be home grown, with too much work to manage safely. Ask to see the installer's safety and quality manuals - this is a requirement in developed sister industries.

Feel free to contact jcromer@greencityaustin.com
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Ambient Technologies, Inc. Talesun Solar SolPowerPeople, Inc. Magnum Energy Inc. Intertek Solaire Generation DNV KEMA Energy & Sustainability
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters