Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Selling Solar to Mainstream America

By Sara Parker, RenewableEnergyAccess.com
October 18, 2006   |   21 Comments
Now that SB 1 is law, the next step will be marketing the benefits of solar power to the average homeowner.

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"If the solar industry is going to continue to thrive and expand we are going to have to separate ourselves from the alternative fuels debate. The technology is good now. It can be distributed now. Now is when we have to sell."

-- California Senator Kevin Murray
21 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 21
October 18, 2006
Implementing PV on every home or business opens the door for the most important concept related to renewable energy: microgeneration. The idea of generating electricity locally and utilizing much smaller power grids has many benefits. Supplies are more secure as we eliminate the possibly of large(+500MW) plant failures from causing rolling blackouts. We save electricity by utilizing current locally and minimizing the loss that incurs over high tension lines. But most importantly, we ELIMINATE the energy industry which is no sapping us for a few hundred billion dollars of pure PROFIT. Let us rally around the idea that electricity should not be a commodity the same as shoes or automobiles.
Comment
2 of 21
October 18, 2006
Gene is right, too expensive. $1 a watt, we'll all be rich. Just hang in there and don't quit your day job yet.
Comment
3 of 21
October 18, 2006
Gene... your math is just plain wrong.

Installation amounts to about $1 - 1.5 / installed Watt.

The price of solar is coming down all the time.

Installed solar panels will pay themselves off within 7-10 years & provide free electricity for 15-20 years beyond that.


Plus, you've got other benefits:

No pollution compared with nuclear power (umm where do you put all that radioactive garbage) and coal (got mercury anyone? destroyed earth.. underground coal fires)

So if you factor in those costs... solar starts to look very cheap.

Plus... with solar, you don't need as much grid infrastructure. No need to move the power to your house, when the power is already on your house.

Matt
Comment
4 of 21
October 18, 2006
Why is the word "welfare" a word with a bad connotation?

It means doing good for people.

Why is that wrong?

Wake up Jim.

North Korea is building a nuclear bomb. Why? Bush didn't wan't to talk to them.. and called
them part of the "axis of evil". Hmm. we invaded and destroyed one of those axis countries. Iraq.

If you were a small, poor country & the US might be targeting you soon. What would you do? Build a nuke? Or get bombed?

We are spending 1.5 billion a week in Iraq.

What does this buy us?

Nearly 3000 Young US soldiers are dead. 650,000 Iraqis are dead.

Al Qaeda membership is up 20x.

There are more people that hate the US in the world than ever before.


3 billion for solar cells I'd say is a great move... Not just for US jobs the US economy... but for the future of peace & stability.

it moves us away from this stupid fight over resources like oil & lets us be free... powered by the sun.

Matt
Comment
5 of 21
October 18, 2006
These 'welfare' programs are going spark more competition to drive the cost of solar way down as demand for affordable solar increases. Don't you know that the ice caps are melting? What's the cost of building a huge levy to stop NYC from being deluged with sea water? Did you include that in your cost calculations? Don't forget to add in agriculture impact (drought, flooding)

The third wave of solar energy is brimming on the horizon. Thin films combined with the economies of printing are currently being ramped up for massive deployment. Check out companies like Nanosolar, Miasole and Daystar.

Peace.
Comment
6 of 21
October 18, 2006
Natural gas will peak just as oil will. We should have begun a serious effort to transition away from fossil fuels years ago. Progress continues to be made in bringing down the costs of solar and wind. There is evidence of that right on this site, including a breakthrough by SolarPower that occurred just recently.

Fossil fuel will continue to go up in price as the cost of solar goes down. An investment made now in solar will look better as prices of fossil fuels go up over the next decades. Considering depletion and the current crisis in global warming, we simply cannot wait until the day when solar is "competitive" with natural gas, oil, or coal. If we simply let the market decide, we will not be able to make the transition that must begin now.
Comment
7 of 21
October 18, 2006
This boost for solar is warranted given the federal government's historical support of fossil based generation through extensive subsidies/tax credits. It's about time that we started committing some real resources to transforming away from our fledgling fossil fuel based economy.

As to the prior posted comment, natural gas power is relatively cheap and "clean burning". This clean burning title, however, fails to take into account the human and environmental costs of gas extraction and transportation. Not to mention that it even though it emits less carbon dioxide than coal it is still at 55% of the CO2 emitted by coal per unit energy produced (without carbon sequestration technology utilization), whereas solar cells might register some single digit percentage if one considers mining, manufacturing and transportation of cells.
Comment
8 of 21
October 18, 2006
First, present photovoltaic solar technology is neither cost-competitive or cost-effective. Installation costs are between $7 and $8 per watt, while the DOE goal is $1 per installed watt.

Secondly, the 3.2 billion (actually 3.9 billion I believe) dollars is a hidden tax, payed for by all utility ratepayers, and touted by P.G.&E. as their rebates. Actually, P.G.&E. charges for administering all rebate programs.

Third, users will pay about twice what they would have paid for power off the grid over 25 years.

Photovoltaic cells and films may be cost-effective someday - but not now.
Comment
9 of 21
October 18, 2006
Great $3.2 billlon in welfare payments. God forbid that we should save money and build a some power plants that run off of natural gas - which is vastly cheaper and mostly clean.
Comment
10 of 21
October 19, 2006
To Jim/Matt: do you really mean to say that one could invest, e.g., $20K in PV panels for his home and save $2000-2857/year in electricity costs? This would without question be the best risk adjusted investment available anywhere. Please, if you are still around, prove it! I'm very interested in solar but it drives me nuts to encounter (not that you are one) so many glib, ignorant solar cultists who practice deception or motivate out of political ideology or try to inspire fear. But I'll run out tomorrow and install panels if I can get a return of 10-15 percent annually!! And pay you a $50 "finders" fee.
Comment
11 of 21
October 19, 2006
For Jim who says that the installed cost is recovered in 7-10 years: show me how you arrive at this, which equates to a yearly cash on cash return of 10-15 percent!!! Please, show me.
Comment
12 of 21
October 19, 2006
PV is not ready for prime time. However solar thermal is
and so is wind.
I'd rather see that $3.2B spent on wave energy, this seems to be
where wind was 15 years ago.
Comment
13 of 21
October 19, 2006
I read a report recently that natural gas from Canada will expire in about 20 years unless huge new fields are found. Since it produces a large amount of global warming it only makes sense to subsidize and use all forms of Solar Power. Congratulations to California in continuing to lead North America in reduction of Global Warming.
Comment
14 of 21
October 20, 2006
Put a Solar Water Heater on your roof, it's a lot cheaper than PV.
An 80 Gallon "Thermosyphon" solar water heater installed on 6,000 homes will save 18 Mega Watts of energy output per year in Arizona or California and approx 21,000 tones of Green House gas immissions.
Comment
15 of 21
October 21, 2006
Should we put a price on American self-reliance, ingenuity, and pioneering spirit? Consider how expensive computers used to be, then imagine our world without them now.

Does anyone really expect to benefit from clean energy without paying an initial investment?

I look forward to energy independence. Surely such an investment compares favorably with installing a new kitchen from Home Depot. At least my refrigerator and lights will still be on after the next Loma Prieta.

By the way, the Iraq war is not just about oil, but replacing the military base Bush gave to (his buddies) the Saudis after their Kamikaze attack on NYC. Nice payback for bailing him out of his failed oil prospecting company, huh?
Comment
16 of 21
October 21, 2006
Anything to help STOP GW!
Are people still too cheap to consider forking over a few bucks to promote the only thing that will save the bios, that is RE on a VAST scale. These "welfare" programs are indeed overy expensive now, but is worth it because more RESEARCH will be gained thus lowering the costs of the final 3 or so million square mile of collection devises!
Comment
17 of 21
October 21, 2006
How can the installed watt be $1.00 when the cost of the PV module can easily exceed $5.00 per rated watt? Not mention other related costs involved with installing a working system such as PV array mounting, electrical items such as; conduit, wire, straps, boxes, disconects, a licensed electrical contractor, etc, etc. - then we get into converting all of that low voltage direct current electricity into into a higher voltage alternating electricity and concerting that with the utilities when needed or storing it for use at night, then there is permits, shipping and handling costs, and if a loan is made... intrest
I was thinking more along the lines of $35.00+ per watt installed. And this now. Wait until these chain stores tack on there mark up! It will be even higher.
Comment
18 of 21
October 23, 2006
this is only the begining i would like to mention the fact that govener granhlom (michigan) is opening doors to the renewable energy production . if there is anything we know in michigan its how to mass produce. i just hope that it happens fast enough to make a differance if a world war starts tommrow. thank you govenor arnold
Comment
19 of 21
October 23, 2006
i agree with matt
Comment
20 of 21
October 26, 2006
Well said, Matt.
Comment
21 of 21
January 5, 2007
Third party financing will eliminate the price objection.A revolution is being launched that will lead to massive implementation of Solar PV .


http://www.JoinTheSolution.com/MadiSUN
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Sara Parker

View Sara Parker's Profile
About: Sara Parker is a writer and poet based in New Hampshire. She holds a B.A. from Hampshire College with a concentration in creative writing. She has written for n... more »

Advertise With Us

Solectria Renewables LLC ESI Inc. of Tennessee SunMaxx Solar Black & Veatch Corporation Dow Solar Valentin Software, Inc - providing Solar Design Software Puralytics
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters