Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

California Formally Adopts Performance-Based Solar Incentives

August 29, 2006   |   12 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"Today's decision marks another milestone in California's commitment to renewable energy."

-- PUC President Michael R. Peevey
12 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 12
August 30, 2006
A 100 kW system is a relatively small commercial system. It is less than 500 Sunpower panels. In other words we should and will see plenty of these going in. The peformance incentive will allow the market to mature and have an easier sale for systems of all sizes.
Comment
2 of 12
August 30, 2006
First, Phillip, the term 100 Kilowatt system is meaningless. The term probably applies to the panel(s) output in the middle of summer, at noon. The only meaningful term in PV solar is kilowatt hours per year. That's because solar radiation varies wildly with the seasons.

The real purpose of this comment is to ask why we are only talking about solar electric energy? A much more efficent energy system would be a solar-thermal trough system with the hot liquid (up to 270 degrees C) being fed into an efficient heat exchanger to provide air conditioning, thus bypassing the grid altogether. About 30% of our peak power is consumed by air conditioners- half industrial, so solar-thermal would be perfect.
Comment
3 of 12
August 30, 2006
I agree that performance based incentives would be a great regulator of quality, however, the up front cost of systems would deter many potential buyers. To avoid detering any potential customers, keep the current rebate structure and modify it with a small reduction to offset a small production rebate. Keep reducing the rebate annualy and increasing performance based incentives and people will catch on. If you do it all at once, you risk loosing the huge momentum that the solar industry is enjoying today.
Comment
4 of 12
August 30, 2006
The performance based incentive program is arguably the most important solar related legislation ever approved in California. There are too many sub standard photovoltaic installations in California, [and across the nation I presume] and we needed a method to rid the solar industry of solar companies with questionable qualifications and incompetent installs.


FYI. to Phillp Treanor, it takes approx. 130 sq.ft. per kilowatt of solar array.

allen
Comment
5 of 12
August 30, 2006
How many acres would it take to install a 100 Kilowatt system.

Philip
Comment
6 of 12
August 30, 2006
Gentlefolk,
This is all well and good but how many 100 kW systems have you installed? I haven't done the calculations yet but it seems that performance based incentives would be good for small producers too... Don't mean to be cynical but maybe that's why it's not offered in California. And what happens after five years of operation? Does the 'incentive' continue?

Matthew
Comment
7 of 12
August 30, 2006
Funny this is what the Wisconsin incentive program has been doing for the last five years for those systems under 100 kW. (WI has no systems of over 100 kW.)

google "Focus on Energy" "solar electric cash back reward" Wisconsin (include all the quotes) to see it.
Comment
8 of 12
August 31, 2006
3000 MW by 2017 seems a very modest target, considering that Germany is now at 1500 MW (with 600MW added just last year), thanks to its feed-in tariff support of €0.50 per kWh generated. I'm researching why people buy PV arrays to put on their roofs, so seek to understand the motivation. Is it just an investment thing? Or do incentives make PV affordable for people who want it for other reasons such as energy independence or CO2 reduction?
Comment
9 of 12
September 5, 2006
I like it. Good for SMA, who always wins that race
Comment
10 of 12
September 6, 2006
Pursuant to the posting from Gene Lucas, I agree that there should be more attention paid to thermal systems. If you do the math and convert BTU's produced to KW Hours, the cost for thermal solar makes for a more attractive financial and environmental investment when compared to Photovoltaic systems.

Just run the numbers for an Olympic pool w/solar, or a commercial domestic solar water system. If more consumers were educated and made aware of the power of thermal solar, the topic would be almost entirely about thermal systems.

Until they, [the consumers], learn more about BTU's thermal conversion to kilowatts, the photovoltaics lobbyists will continue to over sell the 'sexy' part of PV's.

allen@scholfieldsolar.com
Comment
11 of 12
September 6, 2006
Will this also include wind energy? Our utility company does not offer any insentives to California customers, is there any way we can recapture these insentives?
Comment
12 of 12
November 5, 2006
I thought there were additional incentives non-profits. Aren't there reduced interest rate (4.1%, 4.5%) loans available too?
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

American Wind Energy Association Comment:Visions Dow Solar Das Haus: Innovation in Renewables and Energy Efficiency National Hydropower Association SMA America, LLC Texas Combined Heat & Power Initiative
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters