Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Senator Clinton Calls for Investing in Renewable Energy

May 30, 2006   |   7 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"Our present system of energy is weakening our national security, hurting our pocketbooks, violating our common values and threatening our children's future. Right now, instead of national security dictating our energy policy, our failed energy policy dictates our national security."

-- Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, New York
7 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 7
May 30, 2006
Nice work Hillary!Maybe we should follow the Europeans and build a Pan American Wind Power Utility grid on the east coast. This project will tap into the outstanding wind energy reources off our coastline. Let the Cape Wind project be built first and then plan for more farms over a twenty five year period.
Comment
2 of 7
May 30, 2006
We need to increase incentives for hybrids.
Yaah! We need to get rid of gasoline powered lawn mowers (sub 200cc engines) that polute 30x's as much as a newer automobile.

In ten years time, the whole Tecumsa, Briggs&Stratton scenario will change.

We'll see only models that have Li-ion batteries that are charged by stand alone or roof top PV modules. These little machines will then have no pollution, little noise and very happy owners for sure.

We'll save 100 million gallons of fuel here alone, not to mention the HUGE decreases in CO2's, etc.

By the way, the PV array will charge the hybrid car batteries and every other small
lawn care tool.
Comment
3 of 7
May 31, 2006
Some of Senator Clinton's comments make sense, but her statement about 8 million barrels of oil per day, replaced (I guess
with ethanol or biofuels) is not realistic - especially with corn. To produce that many barrels of ethanol from corn would require us to use all the land area from the Canadian border to the Gulf of Mexico - two states wide. Even using switchgrass, which is much more area efficient, would require all the area in Colorado and Wyoming. Plus, the processing of that much corn is a logistics impossibility. Everyone is shying away from "clean" coal, and I can't understand why. It's there, and there's a 260 year supply of oil available from it.
Comment
4 of 7
May 31, 2006
You are on the rigth way, you have it all, wind sun hydro, what are you waiting for??
oilcompanies?
kindly jens
Comment
5 of 7
June 1, 2006
I believe that the comments by Mr. Lucas re the limitations of ethanol from corn and other food crops are realistic. Certainly there is a market for ethanol, but only as a way to use up surplus crops and biomass not otherwise useable. Also, the technology to clean up coal may help, but the current dangers from soot, mercury and CO2 are immense. As for oil, is it not likely that at sometime in the future, if there is a future for our grandchildren, people will wonder at the tremendous wastefullness of a society that burned up ship loads of oil in Humvees and SUVs? And as for nuclear, don't we all wish we had never heard of the thousands of people who died as a result of Chernobyl?
Comment
6 of 7
June 1, 2006
What the Senator is proposing is what this country needs to get moving now toward energy self-sufficiency responsibly. We have so far lacked political will to do anything much besides give more tax breaks to the oil, coal and nuclear industries.
Just imagine what could have been done with the 300 billion dollars wasted by invading Iraq?
I think we could relegate the oil, coal, and nuclear industries to footnotes in the history books, if we really wanted to.
A big pat on the back to the Senator for having the fortitude to stand up and say what needs to be said. I hope this is not an isolated thing on her part.
Comment
7 of 7
June 5, 2006
It appears that many are afraid of nuclear power. The Chernobyl design was asking for problems, mostly a great example for fear mongering.
Why, other than ignorance is there resistance to pebble bed nuclear reactor designs. They are very efficient, fail "safe" in that the reaction does not run away and can be contained with the proper build materials and can make hydrogen directly. Waste is a problem for all forms of nuclear power but realistically, putting a "relatively" small amount of pollution in a very far away place must be better than all the problems we now have with oil, coal, balance of payments, pollution and green house gasses. Why not a program to educate folks, rather than foment discord.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

2GreenEnergy.com Maritime Geothermal SCHOTT Solar PV, Inc. American Electric Technologies, Inc. (AETI) Blue Sky Energy, Inc. Krannich Solar Inc. Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters