Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

"Perceived Problem" for Wind Power Undergoes Research

May 30, 2006   |   9 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"Very seldom do you see developers, wildlife ecologists, federal agencies, state entities and preservationists working together to examine a perceived problem."

-- Dr. Robert Robel, an expert on prairie-chicken populations
9 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 9
May 30, 2006
Effects on the prairie chicken is only one of many environmental concerns about wind farms. Research is also underway to determine if <a href="http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/wind-power/">wind power</a> has a damaging impact on other endangered birds like the orange-bellied parrot and rare eagle species.

Other concerns have been raised about the <a href="http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/wind-power/news2006-05-11.php">low-level sound from wind turbines</a> and there effect on squirrel populations. According to research the noise makes them more paraniod and harder to catch by the predators that depend on them as a food source. One human family has even been reported to have had to move out of there house because the sound made them sick.

Obviously a lot more research must be done in this field before we can fully understand the possible local effects of these massive new wind energy projects, and whether or not the clean energy benefits are greater than potential harm.
Comment
2 of 9
May 30, 2006
I wonder what a prairie chicken is? I think it's
amusing that some are trying to protect them so that hunters can shoot them.
Comment
3 of 9
May 31, 2006
Good point, Eldon. We have to keep in mind that the choice is not between wind turbines and pristine nothingness, but between wind turbines and other vastly more harmful power generation methods.

High tension lines from centralized power plants, for example, kill 800 times the number of birds each year as wind turbines. So where's the constituency arguing for eliminating the electricity grid??
Comment
4 of 9
May 31, 2006
I watched in horror as a kestrel hit a power line and fell dead to the ground. I have lost track of the number of dead chickadees and song sparrows that broke necks against my windows. So I have little sympathy when I hear anecdotes about bird death from windfarms, but no mention of the deaths from coal-fired air pollution or deaths from the millions of miles of power and communications lines, fences, and radio towers and their support wires. Hey! - a little balance here.
Comment
5 of 9
May 31, 2006
Great comment David!
I'd say the same of the "pristine wilderness / national treasure" called Nantucket Sound. Which is somehow also one of the most heavily traveled waterways in the country when the opponents are concerned about the views from their waterfront mansions with manicured lawns lining this pristine jewel -- I mean when they are concerned about the safety of recreational boaters.
By the way, the MA Audubon Society has come out with conditional support for Cape Wind.
There is need for studies, and I am glad that this process is taking place. The technology has improved and the impacts to birds have diminished, but there are probably areas that would be inappropriate. We have "developed" this country extensively, so there are so very few places left for wildlife. We do need to protect species that are threatened and endagered. If wind turbines are found to harm protected species in some isolated places, it will be used against any projects, even those sited properly.
Comment
6 of 9
May 31, 2006
Let's step back and get some perspective! We didn't do a study of the effects on prairie chicken demographics or other wildlife when we built large urban cities on the Plains, nor sprawling suburbs, mega-malls, strip mines, interstate highways, cell phone towers, international airports, huge coal burning power plants and their distribution grids, nor even the farmhouse, barn, and silo of the farmer who wants to put up the wind turbine...but that turbine is just one step too far? C'mon.
Comment
7 of 9
May 31, 2006
regarding bird deaths .... there is a very simple but effective solution .... warn off the birds with bird distress calls broadcast over loadspeakers .....

http://www.birddamage.com/combo.htm

..... Paradox
Comment
8 of 9
May 31, 2006
Regarding:
" ... One human family has even been reported to have had to move out of there house because the sound made them sick. "

I suspect they have a design problem .... at certain wind speeds and conditions, it creates a sub-audible 7Hz resonance or vibration ...

http://www.forteantimes.com/articles/153_sonicweapons.shtml

"According to the Working Paper on Infrasound Weapons produced by Hungary for the United Nations in 1978 4, the frequency that is thought to be most dangerous to humans is between 7 and 8Hz. This is the resonant frequency of flesh and, theoretically, it can rupture internal organs if loud enough. Seven hertz is also the average frequency of the brain's alpha rhythms; thus this frequency has been described as dangerous but also relaxing"


.... Paradox
Comment
9 of 9
May 31, 2006
Sound and low vibrations can have detrimental effects on human and animal life. Towers may have to be equipt with some sort of shocks or sound deadeners.

It has been well established that living within a short distance from an airport may result in noise produced stress leading to degenerative diseases.

There should be a buffer zone between wind farms and residential areas. 400 meters are not enough. The distance should be in proportion to the size of the generators and the conducting medium. The harder the rock, the wider the buffer zone should be.

In Hawaii, the buffer zone for the Geothermal prototype was only 1500 meters but in California, it was 15 miles. There were many complaints of illness because the hydrogen sulfide produced is twice as deadly as hydrogen cyanide.

adrianakau@aol.com
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Schletter Inc. Grundfos Direct Sensors Prudent Living, Inc. SCHOTT Solar PV, Inc. Helios Solar Works ClearEnergy Inc. Comment:Visions
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters