Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Solar Energy Milestone Reached in the Arizona Desert

By Jesse Broehl, Editor, RenewableEnergyAccess.com
April 24, 2006   |   12 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"This solar plant exemplifies that thousands of megawatts of solar electric power can be brought on in the southwestern United States without polluting land or water, without competing for water resources, and meeting baseload electric power requirements of a dynamically growing region of the United States."

-- Scott Sklar of the Stella Group
12 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 12
April 24, 2006
We have to consider the operating costs of the solar plant and not just the first cost. The fuel cost is nil and so are the CO2 emissions (gain in carbon credits). Let us also not forget that we are still thinking in terms of "A Single Plant". If for example, we look at the production cost of "A Single Car" without mass production, there would be no takers. So the urgent need is to get hundreds of solar plants up and running and then people will start talking "Why natural gas".

S.C.Sekhar
Comment
2 of 12
April 24, 2006
It appears Wayne does not think that paying $6,000 in capital cost per kilowatt hour of generating capacity is a good idea. Other types of generating systems are less than $1000 per kilowatt hour of generating capacity.
Comment
3 of 12
April 24, 2006
Wayne is saying that if this plant powered up for only 1 hour it would cost $6,000 for that single kw*hr. Not attractive in his opinion, but I'm guessing they plan to keep the plant operating for more than 1 hour in which case the cost per kw*hr will decrease over time.

Here's an easy way to look at it - it powers 200 homes, and each home would have to contribute $30,500 to buy the plant outright for $6.1 million. You can figure out from there whether it would make sense to spend $30,500 now to have a renewable source of energy for the next 30 years or so....
Comment
4 of 12
April 24, 2006
In reaction to Wayne Bostick's comment -- I am not an energy professional and as such I am unlearned as to the feasibility of this project. So would some one explain in layman's terms why or why not this 1 Megawatt Generator is worth $6.1 million. Thank you.
Comment
5 of 12
April 24, 2006
$6,000 a kw !! I don't think so !
Comment
6 of 12
April 25, 2006
I have heard that the larger solar thermal system being built in Nevada is closer to half the capital cost.

Also, the large plants in CA have delivered energy cost (to the utility) between 13 and 16 cents per kWh. This includes financing, O&M, capital repay and profit.

With all of these renewable systems the delivered energy cost and ability to meet the system's peak capacity needs is most important.

From the article, it seems that this small system was a proof of technology and its improvements.
Comment
7 of 12
April 26, 2006
This is great no matter what the cost. Renewable Energy gets less expensive the more you use it, unlike fossil fuels that get more and more costly each day.
The Luz plants in California produce power at about 8 cents a kilowatt hour.
Comment
8 of 12
April 26, 2006
This plant shows that Renewable Energy is doable and MUST be implemented in order to replace fossil fuels. It is not a matter of looking at the cost per KW capacity but rather the ongoing costs, real costs, of burning fossil fuels. Costs such as climate change, cyclones that have cost $billions, health costs due to pollution, radioactive waste from burning coal ( yes ! coal contains Uranium and Thorium which are NOT removed by electrostatic precipitators and produce radioative Radon gas), wars fought over oil ( why do you think the US are in IRAQ !). The list goes on. When will the politicians realise that we MUST change and we MUST CHANGE NOW !
Comment
9 of 12
May 5, 2006
When comparing the $/kWh for solar thermal plants, it is important to remember that this power is available *when* it is needed... peak power is produced during the hottest part of the day, just when air conditioners are using the most power. As such, power from solar thermal plants is worth more than power which is only available at other times of the day. Note that the article refers to this plant as "baseload" power. We will never get to 100% renewable using just cheap wind... we need solar, too.
Comment
10 of 12
December 29, 2006
Too bad we can't petition to ammend the constitution for the tranfers of war money into RE mass production, afterall, it is the taxpayer's money, and our country to save!
Comment
11 of 12
January 5, 2007
Hundreds of thousands of e;ectric meters spinning backwards...
It's coming...

http://www.JoinTheSolution.com/MadiSUN
Comment
12 of 12
Dear Sirs

A good website!

I would add the "friendly print" function.

Best regards,
Graciela Sapiro-Goldman
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

RevoluSun SolarEdge Technologies Total Energy USA groSolar Green Power Conferences Idaho Department of Commerce KYOCERA Solar, Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters