Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Fuel Economy Standards Could Downsize U.S. Foreign Oil Dependency

April 13, 2006   |   10 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"We have been negligent in investing in energy research and development, as well as in ways to reward clean, domestic sources of power production. This study, and the vision of Americans for Energy Independence, explores how we can make the nation more environmentally sound and geopolitically secure."

-- Professor Daniel M. Kammen, Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory, U.C. Berkeley
10 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 10
April 13, 2006
We just need to have the public refuse to buy anything except the cleanest vehicles. The top green cars list should drive all of our choices. The auto companies won't make inefficient vehicles if we stop buying them. Just look at GM and FORD.
No CAFE standards are needed if we get all the people to TH!NK and act responsibly. That's a big dream but if gas prices were no subsidized and sold at the real $10 a gal we would all win.
Comment
2 of 10
April 13, 2006
This article talkes about "Fuel Economy Standards" but never mentions CAFE,
Corperate Average Fuel Economy.
Probably because any attempt to realistically increase CAFE is
political suicide. Increasing CAFE helps the Japanese and
hurts Detroit. Therefore it won't happen.
Comment
3 of 10
April 13, 2006
I think Professor Daniel M. Kammen's study states the problem well. We have to recognize energy conservation and renewable energy enhancement as two of the most important means of reaching independence. It is really time for us to act on this matter as a nation.

It does not make sense for us to continue oil dependency by pouring our wealth into foreign countries that harbor ill will to us. We have to stand on our own two feet much as did our pilgrim forfathers or our ancestors who braved the deserts and mountains to found our nation. Personal as well as national pride is at stake.

People did not come to America to continue being subserviant to the countries they left. By being dependent upon foreign oil, we go back to being under this condition which is not really promotive of freedom. America is supposed to be the land of the free and not the land of the "needy oil grubbers". Are we to be slaves of oil?

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment
4 of 10
April 14, 2006
what about diesel powered cars? they're between 15 and 25% more efficient than gasoline powered cars, and less contaminant. in the ec 52% of cars are diesel, in the us it's 0.7% switching to diesel cars could save the us economy as much as 8% of the fuel it uses. the diesel cycle is on average 20% more efficient than the gasoline fueled otto cycle, which is in turn 20% more efficient than the ethanol fueled otto cycle. draw your own conclusions. abtw, carnot's equation is still valid!
Comment
5 of 10
April 14, 2006
AS a UK observer of the US, I see a relationship between the mess Detroit is in , and the absurdly weak CAFE standard. My wife drives a french/japanese car which does 65 mpg ( as meansured by us not the manufacturer) in mixed town /country driving, is around the cheapest on the UK market, and is entirely adequate for shopping trips and freeways. The Japanese and europe have invested in efficient cars which people buy. Yet Detroit has preferred to waste its research and marketing budget on SUV's-cars that are expensive to buy and own. So Detroit steadily loses market share with GM heading for bankruptcy. With a really tough CAFE standard as in Europe, the tremendous US R&D and Marketing power would be redirected to making cars that make sense , and in a few years perhaps the rest of the world would want to buy something from Detroit.
Comment
6 of 10
April 14, 2006
I stood on a street corner this afternoon and watched the SUVs, Hummers, and large pick-ups go by one after the other. Some people will gravitate voluntarily toward plug-in hybrids and other earth-saving technologies, but I think most will not. What can be done? Only two things come to mind at the moment - raise taxes on gasoline (which will have the unfortuneate effect of making cars too expensive for some low income people without alternatives) and get the government to lead toward systems that will work toward the common good. Unfortuneately, many of the same people who love their large vehicles "think" the Republican party is capable of leading the country intelligently.
Comment
7 of 10
April 14, 2006
We don't need nearly as much fossil fuel as we think we do. But Bush has a steak in the mid-east oil business, and as long as that is there, he will oppose ANYTHING else. Tha't terrible!!
Comment
8 of 10
April 15, 2006
Prof Kammens statement may be correcrt but misdirects by not addressing the whole problem. We import 60 % of our oil and we cannot makeup that shortfall with our own production and all the Canadian oil we can import.
We need more fuel efficient vehicles and vastly improved building energy codes. The federal government has done nothing since the 70's to require better fuel efficiency in automobiles.
It's time to stop the misdirection and solve the problem without regard to those companies who wish to maintain the status quo.
Charles
Comment
9 of 10
April 19, 2006
We have ethanol for our vehicles, we have geothermal and solar electric power plants can supply our electric power. It does not make sense for us to continue oil dependency by pouring our wealth into foreign countries that harbor ill will to us. We have to stand on our own two feet much as did our pilgrim forfathers or our ancestors who braved the deserts and mountains to found our nation. Personal as well as national pride is at stake, as
Adrian Akau said
Comment
10 of 10
April 23, 2006
If we increase taxes on gasoline, it will indeed impact the poor the most. However, if we were to place an excise tax on horsepower, that would only really hit the "gas hogs," and incentivize people to buy lower horsepower cars. I have an SUV, which gets 29 miles to the gallon on the highway, but only has a 158 horsepower engine. It hauls 7 of us and pulls the boat nicely. Nobody needs 250-350 horsepower, except people pulling big 5th wheelers and big rigs. Make them pay for their ego.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

FC Business Intelligence Via Expo Blue Sky Energy, Inc. Grundfos Direct Sensors RevoluSun Kipp & Zonen Idaho Department of Commerce
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters