Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

"Back Room Maneuvering" Pays Off for Opponents of Cape Wind

By Andy Kollmorgen, Podcast Editor, RenewableEnergyAccess.com
April 7, 2006   |   7 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"The opposition is centered around the fact that there are some folks who don't want to peacefully coexist with wind turbines six miles from their private beaches."

-- Jim Gordon, Cape Wind Associates
7 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 7
April 7, 2006
BIG COAL IS MOVING TO KILL OFFSHORE WIND THROUGH CARBON PUPPET MITT ROMNEY. THIS IDIOT THINKS PEOPLE WANT A COAL PROSTITUTE FOR PRESIDENT. BUT VOTERS ARE STARTING TO REALIZE THAT MERCURY POISONING, ACID RAIN AND POLLUTION ARE WAYS UTILITIES TRANSFER UNMET OBLIGATIONS ONTO THEM.
A CYNICAL PUBLIC IS DEMANDING CLEAN, SAFE ENERGY. GORDON AND ROMNEY'S ARROGANT STANCE ARE ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE ONGOING SUICIDE OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY . -- RDM
Comment
2 of 7
April 8, 2006
It seems illogical to me that Governor should be given power blocking development that "would provide clean, emissions-free power to three-quarters of Cape Cod and nearby islands." To proceed in this negative manner seems to have long term harm. Massachusetts' energy supply is to be exceeded by demand in the near future. Building of additional coal burning plants or expansion of existing ones are not a promising back carbon dioxide or other emissions.

We need to think of long term development. If PHEV vehicles become available, there will be a transition away from fossil and carbon based liquid fuels. What better way to provide plug in power than through wind energy which should serve in place of oil.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment
3 of 7
April 8, 2006
I am really ashamed that Hawaii's Democratic Senator Daniel K. Inouye backed the amendment. It is regrettable that his judgement and the judgement of the other senators is so flawed. Perhaps his type of thinking is the reason that wind energy development in Hawaii has never gone forward.

Sometimes I think that politicians can do more harm than good in the representative process because after a few decades in Washington, some of them want to represent themselves rather than the people for whom they are supposed to speak.

I can find no excuse for this behavior which tears at the fabric of the democratic process and at the very survival of our nation. These representatives seem to be becoming plaque plugging up the arteries of our nation.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment
4 of 7
April 9, 2006
I often think of why once mighty civilizations failed. Aside from lack of food crop production or lack of water, the only reasons I can come up with is poor leadership. In the event that leaders become selfish and indulgent to their own whims, then, bit by bit, the security of that civilization becomes slowly but ever so definitely eroded away until it topples.

It is like a person contracting a degenerative disease due to lack of nutrition. Day by day the person consumes food inadequate in vitamins and minerals. Day by day he starves and weakens himself to open up his immune system to the attack.

These senators act in the same manner so as to deprive our nation of energy production methods so sorely needed. The actions of these senators and therefore the senators themselves are a disgrace to the leadership positions to which they have been entrusted.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment
5 of 7
April 12, 2006
Political leaders are not only entrusted with the power and authority to make decisions that best benefit ALL their constituents, they also are mantled with the ACCOUNTABILITY to act responsibly. When they don't, our political system tends to be self-correcting, fortunately. Truculent, selfish and self-centered autocrats won't survive. Cape Wind -- or something up there akin to it, WILL go forward because the wind blows for free...and there's a lot of it around the Cape. Utilities who are paying gobs of money for coal, oil and natural gas generation plants will reach the point where the cost of these traditional feedstocks can no longer be borne by consumers. Wind, solar, wave power and biomass will then be the only economic sources left...and the Mitt Romneys of the world will just have to conform with reality...
Comment
6 of 7
April 13, 2006
I find electric power lines offensive to look at. Maybe the residents close to Cape Wind also find electric power lines offensive to look at. Maybe they could tolerate some wind mills just as they tolerate electric power lines.
Comment
7 of 7
April 15, 2006
Amazing how the New England States can complain about pollution blowing in from the Mid West coal fired plants, but are unwilling to increase Wind Energy which is clean , but in some eyes if they can see that far(6 miles),WTG's are considerd unsightly, yet these opponents feel quite happy going along with the most ugly wooden poles and overhead power lines foisted on Communities. The external power suppliers, Canada the Mid-West and others could be a factor to apply pressure to NIMBY proponents and selfish Oligarchs
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Solar FlexRack Black & Veatch Corporation Growth Energy Upsolar Enphase Energy EnPower Systems Inc. Alpha Technologies
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters