Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Bill Introduced to Extend Federal Renewable Energy Tax Credits

By Jesse Broehl, Editor, RenewableEnergyAccess.com
March 17, 2006   |   6 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
We expect this bill to have strong bipartisan support and since it was introduced by the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, it will have the legs to move through Committee quickly.
- Rhone Resch, Executive Director of the Solar Energy Industries Association
6 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 6
March 17, 2006
I hope the bill goes through. I am sure that members of both parties realize that it would really help the renewable industry, especially wind become more a part of regular mainstream business. No one needs to say how much our country needs renewables in its fight against oil dependency. Our leaders seem to be on track. I just hope that no "tacky" additions are added on to discourage the passage of a S.2401. My compliments to Senators Charles E. Grassley and Max Baucus for the introduction of the bill. Renewables deserve this chance.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment
2 of 6
March 22, 2006
What would be fantastic is for the same support being proposed for solar and wind to be offered to other strategic renewable energy resources - such as the emerging ocean energy/ wave power sector. These less mature sectors require as much - if not more - support to get them going and leverage in private sector investment - but currently have no such support.

Worth bearing in mind that US wave energy resource is equivalent to twice Iraq's annual oil production, plus costs are substantially below solar and projected to fall below wind in the longer term.
Comment
3 of 6
March 22, 2006
This extension is needed to give individuals and organizations sufficient time good planning and arranging the adequate financing for the large investments needed to accomplish effective renewable energy projects.

When these projects are rushed to meet unrealistic time frames the loss often is a poor or non-functioing project that reflects poorly on the whole idea of renewable energy.

When this occurs otherwise good ideas and projects may be rejected because of the poor reputations earned by these rushed projects
Comment
4 of 6
March 22, 2006
Our society is headed for an energy crisis of biblical proportions. In 2004 Stephen Leeb PhD predicted oil prices would rise to $100 per barrel by the end of the decade (2010). In late 2004 oil was priced at about $25/bbl. Today we have oil priced above $60/bbl. Leeb now predicts $200/bbl oil by 2010. We need incentives such as we have in EPACT, to avoid a total collapse of our economy. The largest price increase oil prices that we previously suffered (the 1970's) were a result of political events, such as the oil embargo by OPEC. Today's high prices are due to increased demand by developing third world countries, especially China & India. Presently, and most likely from today onward, increases in demand will be greater than increases in supply. This will only make the situation worse. We MUST not only extend current tax incentives for development of alternative energy sources, we need to introduce new tax incentives.
Comment
5 of 6
March 22, 2006
I am all for it. We need all the help we can get for these new energy systems.
Comment
6 of 6
January 24, 2007
Tax credits provided the ice on the slippery slope of the late 70's and early 80's. Many systems were improperly designed and/or installed, with costs often inflated to accommodate the maximum credits available. What we do know is that with the credits we had a thriving industry and without credits it all but disappeared. There is a lesson in this!!
With nearly thirty years to evaluate the effectiveness of those projects, we need to separate the wheat from the chaff before investing our money. Any new program should be built around the success stories and not a current popular political buzzword. The long term success of conservation and alternative energy development should be the mission of any government funded program. I would not want to see a million (just for kicks) "Haliburton Solar Water Heaters" installed for three years and then discontinued.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Solectria Renewables LLC Total Energy USA AllEarth Renewables Krannich Solar Inc. Alpha Technologies Quick Mount PV Solar Electric Power Association
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters