Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Mobile Air Rotors Use Wind to Generate Electricity

December 27, 2005   |   14 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
Magenn Air Rotors are mobile and can be easily moved to different locations to correspond to changing wind patterns. Mobility is also useful in emergency deployment and disaster relief situations.
14 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 14
December 28, 2005
Sounds verry interesting. I think that is a great idea to have a floating HAWT that can take advantage of winds at heigher altitudes without needing an expensive tower. Also, at 400-1000 feet, it greatly reduces the risk to birds, and can be used durring migration seasons without killing too manny birds.
Comment
2 of 14
December 28, 2005
If the delivery date doesn't slip into oblivion, this could be a very interesting product. A lot rides though on how the company, and their first few units if and when they materialize, perform. I suppose the second hurdle will be once there are operational units, speculation as to how long they will last up there.
Comment
3 of 14
December 29, 2005
I would be interested in how they resolved the problems with lightening, atmospheric vs ground electrical potential, and what sort of liability insurance would be required. wouldn,t want one of those falling on one of my neighbors cows.
Comment
4 of 14
January 11, 2006
This is the best wind generator I have ever seen. I did not notice how big they were saying it was. This could be the next generation of wind power. To think from kite to Zeppelin to the cleanest power source out there on the market
Ah I think the kids would be saying dad I think you're nuts.
Comment
5 of 14
January 11, 2006
If that aint the coolest gadget yet . A micro kite windmill.
How many people could say go fly a kite and power there lap top all at the same time. Or hey kids you want to charge the solar yard lights.
Comment
6 of 14
January 12, 2006
A Unike product come accrose in my 30 years in renewable energy sources experece, very much use full for developing countries. Arevolutionary idea in wind technology, Mike Brown served huminity GOD BLESS him.
Comment
7 of 14
January 14, 2006
Very cool. I'd love to see this one go main stream. I only have one hesitation. Helium is a non renewable resource and in limited supply. Would hot air be feasible? Still, great on a smaller scale.
I'm guessing the radius is still just as important.
And yes, Aerial vs ground potential. Good point.
The biggest win is not having a forest of towers to deal when end of life is reached.
Comment
8 of 14
February 7, 2006
This is like the expandable satalites lower orbit less line of sight but no lift off cost.
Comment
9 of 14
February 7, 2006
this year is going to be a flash back to those infamace portrayals of first flight attempts by all who wants to fly.
Great idea thanks, I am sure the applications for this will be enormous.
What are the specs or at least the tandard watt reduction per teather foot?
Comment
10 of 14
February 8, 2006
I really like the concept of not having to build a tower.It will help the cost of the project.Will look forward to see how it works out for the end user .
Comment
11 of 14
February 23, 2006
I suppose the boo birds would object if one of these was tethered to a home or summer cottage, but I think it is a great concept that should be tried out in large numbers. It seems that it would be wonderful in any area not served by a power grid. It seems that isolated summer homes could be well served by them, and they could be garaged in the off season.
Comment
12 of 14
March 8, 2006
I wonder what the FAA will have to say about this. Sounds great.
Comment
13 of 14
June 12, 2006
This design has the greatest potential of any onshore wind generator that I've seen. Mainly due to the fact that getting higher up into the
sky will produce winds stronger and more consistent - Magenn quotes 50% efficiencies,
which equal offshore efficiencies. Tethered offshore should push the efficiencies beyond 75%, which would be tremendous, especially considering the fact that deployment should be
less expensive in that rugged environment,
both initially and long term.
Comment
14 of 14
June 12, 2006
"Very cool. I'd love to see this one go main stream. I only have one hesitation. Helium is a non renewable resource and in limited supply. Would hot air be feasible? Still, great on a smaller scale. "
Hot air is nowhere near bouyant enough
to support the power lines and size of the generators and would require a fuel source, etc. etc. Hydrogen should probably be used instead of helium. Forget your misconceptions of the Hindenburg - it flamed out because of the paint used, which basically had the same composition as a highly volatile rocket fuel. Overcoming ignorance, unfortunately , would be hydrogen's greatest
difficulty, in spite of those who want a hydrogen based energy system - oddly confident about a tank of highly compressed hydrogen under their seat but worried about an unmanned ballon overhead.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Prudent Living, Inc. Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc. Apricus, Inc. SunMaxx Solar Texas Combined Heat & Power Initiative Unirac, Inc. Das Haus: Innovation in Renewables and Energy Efficiency
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters