Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

How Much Will "Million Solar Roofs" Cost?

By David Hochschild, Vote Solar
November 2, 2005   |   12 Comments
California's PUC Set to Vote...

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
While California currently leads the nation in annual solar spending at approximately $150 million a year, it is clear that to bring down the cost of solar over the long term, the incentive budget must be increased in a meaningful way.

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

12 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 12
November 2, 2005
25 cents, hell, I'm forced to pay, what,
25 dollars more for conventional...?
I hope that the negative views (?) on the Governer doesn't hamper this one!
Comment
2 of 12
November 3, 2005
Does the proposal before the CPUC include the prevailing wage provisions sought by the IBEW? Are labor unions involved in the proposal?
Comment
3 of 12
November 4, 2005
Please don't misunderstand me.

I am for solar energy.

I am for sharing my overage.

I am not for giving it away to the power company.

And.. I am not for getting "rich" off of it.

But, if I want to give it away, I will connect an extension cord to my neighbor.
Comment
4 of 12
November 4, 2005
There still is the issue of being fairly compensated for the energy produced by a homeowner.
Only about 30% of taxpayers can itemize.

If 70% can't use "vouchers", like some utilities issue, then where is the fairness?

Is it not just a simple scoop of free energy by the same old lame people who brought you: deregulation" and Enron?

THINK about it.
Comment
5 of 12
November 4, 2005
I am disappointed that the new PUC bill excludes the 25% of California utilities that are run by Municipalities. There are a lot of people who are supplied electricity by municipal utilities (and we don't have a choice) who will not be well served.

I have been wanting solar on my roof for years, but the LADWP has had a locked up waiting list for the same amount of time. A state bill should allow any residence in the state that wants a solar system to be able to take advantage of a rebate. As it stands now, Los Angeles residents not lucky enough to be on the 3 year old waiting list have to pay full price for a system. This has put a big damper on the quantity of residences putting up PV systems.

In sunny Southern California we have a lot of solar power, but not a whole lot of will power to get PV on house roofs.
I would support a PUC solar bill that addresses ALL utilities and not just the privately owned ones.
Comment
6 of 12
November 5, 2005
I would like to sit down and talk with a critic of this proposal. California is blessed with sun resources. Let's use it.
Comment
7 of 12
November 6, 2005
Hmmm ... I can see where energy manufacturers would get the creeps. Equipment taking them out of the loop will not be well received. Does the math work only if manufacturing costs are driven down? Are the equipment manufacturers going to be able to reduce costs enough to make this feasable? The cost of electricity certainly suggests the possibility. A ton of variables though.
Comment
8 of 12
November 7, 2005
Where is hot water in all this??? It makes no sense to install a PV system, that ends up powering you water heater. On a residence you should not be allowed the incentive unless you have a solar hot water heating system installed first.
Comment
9 of 12
November 8, 2005
I am writing from Melbourne, Australia with more sun than California!

Some points:

PV without Solar Hot Water is plain stupid

PV Systems should be "given away" ! By that I suggest that a consortium of government, banks and power utilities get together to provide PV systems to domestic user(3KW) which will provide over 75% of needs - thereby REDUCING the domestic bill by at least 60%, taking into account other standing charges. This saving is separated from the main bill and paid to the lender of the finance until the system is paid for.
If you move house the new owner carries on as usual. MY IDEA!!!!
rolo@labyrinth.net.au +6139764 5855
Comment
10 of 12
November 9, 2005
Responding to points made in the comments:

It may be true that only 30% of the taxpayers in California can itimize their tax returns. But, I assume that anyone interested in a Solar array on the roof of their home is a homeowner. The vast majority of homeowners can itimize their tax returns.

Anyone that heats water with electricity should be punished! That is not an efficeint process. Most people interested in solar learn the importance of minimizing electric power consumption.
Comment
11 of 12
November 9, 2005
Dear Mr. -- Rolf Christ, and -- Keith Rollinson,

The question is correct, Where is hot water in all this??? In PV systems nowhere! PV panel makes direct electricity and from this
can to make hot water in boyler. But for now everybody forget a very good system or two of them. "Parabolic Trough"! Yes Krammer Junction and "Molten Salt Towers"
But not with the used absorbent, because they are expensive. The fact is that this method could produce hot water beside the electricity from the tired steam. We are a Hungarian small company with 5 years research work to make a new fluid for the two above mentioned systems. They are cheaper and has more benefit as the used.Only in this year was published our invention by the WIPO in August under the Nr. : WO 2005 071037 A1.
If somebody has more interest pls. ask it
by E-mail: solartech@ecom.hu
Comment
12 of 12
November 16, 2005
Since solar hot water heating is clearly cost effective in most of California, and more cost effective than solar PV it would seem that solar hot water incentives would be a big part of the package.
Also heat pump waste heat hotwater systems are cost effective and should be encouraged, and ground/water source heat pumps.
The inecentives should be for a comprehensive set of alternatives, with the majority focused on proven/cost effective technologies, and only a portion on incentives to bring down the cost of solar PV.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

American Wind Energy Association Asia Solar Expo Richardson RFPD, Inc. Geothermal Energy Association Rittal Corporation Maritime Geothermal American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE)
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters