Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

High Home Heating Prices: Issues and Solutions

November 22, 2005   |   3 Comments
Results of research on rising home heating prices by the Union of Concerned Scientists

Do you like this research & reports?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"There are a few simple steps individuals can take immediately, with little or no direct costs, that can often reduce energy costs by 10-20 percent or more."
3 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 3
November 26, 2005
I live in a Minneapolis suburb. I heat my house with a ground source heat pump. These are expensive, but a fairly good alternative. As far as I know, there should not be problems retrofitting houses with forced air heat with geothermal heat pumps. Houses with hot water heat are another story. I have a partial solution. I analyzed weather data from our local airport and determined that a geothermal heat pump on a duty cycle connected to fan convectors so that it put out 15000 btu/hr would have supplied over 70% of the heat my house needed last winter. Depending on the manufacturer, that would be a 2 ton heat pump and three fan convectors. I am not in the heating business, so any heating contractor or anyone else is free to correct me.
Comment
2 of 3
December 10, 2005
I really think that if we can generate hydrogen and add it to the LNG to raise the heat content, then we would not require as much gas for heating. If hybrid cars work, what about hybrid gas heating systems? Hydrogen produced from renewables such as wind energy might bring the cost down.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment
3 of 3
January 3, 2006
I've noted in WWII, USAF bombed German plants producing petroleum from coal.
I've wondered why we were not using this process now, especially with the high price of oil from foreign sources. The consumer is spending his money on gasoline and heating oil instead of other products that would benefit the US economy.
I understand the US did produce oil from coal and that our coal reserves would produce more perto than is in the middle east. Pres. Eisenhower stopped funding for the program saying this should be a civilian project. Why?
The oil companies didn't want to persue this as they owned or had vested interests in oil fields around the world. Now the oil companies make outlandish profits and the poor US worker and our economy suffer.
The USA better get on the ball and come up with not only sources of affordable energy but areas of production that would create jobs in this country.
What can the average citizen do to help?
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Apricus, Inc. Intersolar Solar Electric Power Association Konica Minolta Sensing Americas, Inc Renewable Energy World Europe Hydrogen Education Foundation Nextek Power Systems, Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters