FC Business Intelligence
February 01, 2013
London, UK Securing cost reductions and carving out routes to grid parity remains as ever the most pressing issue for the CSP industry.
At the crux of this pursuit is understanding the associated costs of the CSP technologies themselves, whether it be Parabolic Trough, Solar Tower, Linear Fresnel or Dish Sterling. Delving even deeper, the ability to identify and successfully implement cost reduction strategies is dependent on understanding where exactly the bulk of costs currently rests within these technologies.
CSP Today’s Technology reports has recently analysed the costs of Parabolic Trough and Solar Tower and found that CAPEX costs varied by only 1% between these technologies. However the percentage of costs distributed between EPC, developer and solar field provided more significant variation.
For a reference plant with a 110 MW gross, 6 hours of TES and dry cooling located in the MENA region the CAPEX represented the largest portion of lifecycle costs, accounting for 48%.
The distribution of CAPEX costs revealed that within this 48%:
(See figure 1)
For a reference plant with a 100 MW capacity, 6 hours of TES and dry cooling located in the MENA region the CAPEX represented the largest portion of lifecycle costs, accounting for 49%.
The distribution of CAPEX costs revealed that within this 49%:
(See figure 2)
For more information about the CSP Today’s Technology Reports, please visit: http://www.csptoday.com/csp-technology-report/index.php
The information on this page was created and posted by the company identified above. RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse, edit, or substantiate this information and assumes no obligation for this content's accuracy.