Zoë Casey
March 06, 2013
|
30 Comments
An interesting story was posted on the Guardian yesterday, saying that the UK government needs a “plan B” on nuclear power because of the danger that new reactors will not be built in time to avoid energy shortages.
Many of the UK’s ageing reactors will be decommissioned and there is no clear strategy for their replacement, the paper says.
“The ambitions of the UK’s nuclear industry have been dealt significant blows in recent months: the Horizon consortium fell apart…Cumbria’s councillors rejected the building of a long-term waste repository over there. EDF Energy, the French national energy company that will lead the building of the first plant, is in a stand-off with ministers over demands for higher prices for its energy, and work on the first potential reactor is likely to face further opposition, endangering the government’s timetable for new plants,” writes Fiona Harvey in the Guardian.
Wind power can provide one way out of this particular conundrum. First of all, a wind farm once consented can be up and running within the space of six months to one year, while a nuclear power plant takes an average of ten years to build.
Secondly, the price of nuclear power is always rising – which is one of the reasons behind today’s nuclear conundrum. Today, onshore wind power is already competitive with new coal and gas power generation, and cheaper than nuclear power. New onshore wind costs around €c6.5 per kilowatt hour, while new nuclear costs around €c10/kWh (2010 figures, with fuel and carbon risk included). Offshore wind power is more expensive than traditional fuels but costs are falling, and with investment in research and development and an expansion of the sector leading to economies of scale, offshore wind power can be fully competitive by 2030.
Moreover, nuclear is likely to become even more expensive with the inevitable increases in costs of safety and liability following the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan, and nuclear decommissioning costs are huge. In the UK alone nuclear decommissioning costs have been estimated at £53 billion (€64 billion) – an amount which would bring 54 GW of onshore wind power online, producing 41% of the UK’s power production.
Wind power could be part of the UK government’s “plan B” on nuclear.
This blog was originally published on the EWEA blog and was republished with permission.
Lead image: Crossroads via Shutterstock
This blog post has been updated to correct the costs of new onshore and new nuclear.
The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.
March 11, 2013
"Steven and Nick. Are you saying that heat emissions are an infinitesimal contributor to global warming and that the increased CO2 is totally responsible?"
I am saying yes to the first (heat emissions are negligible). CO2 and H2O concentration increases are a significant contributor but there isn't enough evidence to conclude they are totally responsible (although that is a plausible theory).
Steven