The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Solar Says "Good-bye Solyndra"

Lisa Ann Pinkerton
February 20, 2013  |  7 Comments

Print

No company has done greater damage to the image of the American solar industry than Solyndra. It was therefore a source of great delight to me last week as I drove along Interstate 880 through Fremont, CA for what I didn't see. The signs on the old factory were gone. Those persistent thorns in the side of American solar, had finally vanished, closing a chapter in solar history.

It was unfortunate enough that the ill-fated company received DoE loans and then declared bankruptcy. Once the Republican Party attempted to exploit that into what they saw as an Obama scandal, those signs looming over 880 were like knives twisting in the gut of solar.

Let's face it, the center of influence and legacy expertise for the cleantech industry is in the San Francisco Bay Area. It’s home to 100‘s of cleantech companies, investors and blossoming technologies waiting to be commercialized. Many of us drive 880 on a regular basis and I can only imagine what a persistent cloud of doom those signs were.

How many times did cleantech professionals pass by and feel fear or doubt about their own company ending up like Solyndra? How many times did the signs make a venture capitalist thinks twice about funding a promising cleantech start up? How many times did the signs prevent a homeowner from switching their house to solar?

In my business running a boutique cleantech public relations and social media firm, perception is everything. One's perception is shaped by their prospective and everything in our world influences that prospective, for good or for bad. If you have something constantly reminding you of your past failures, casting doubts on your abilities and suggesting you have no hope of future success, it is very difficult to succeed. In relationships, we call this mental abuse.

For me, the departure of the signs represents a delightful turning point for the industry. The cloud has been lifted. It's a symbol that the story of the company's fall is finally "old news" that no one is interested in any more. The fact that President Obama was so bullish on clean technology in his 2013 State of the Union is testament to this. The Republicans may have gained some short term political leverage by attacking an industry that's growing at 13% and creating over 13,000 new jobs in this country, but the Obama reelection shows they ultimately did not succeed with the tactic.

As the industry continues to grow and challenge entrenched fossil fuel interests, we can expect more attempts the politicize solar, especially as more states reach grid parity. Ultimately, the solar industry will find it's mainstream legs and reach a tipping point to being the energy of choice. Until then, it's up to us as an industry to educate and shape public perception in the industry’s favor.

The Solyndra signs are an example of a negative symbol of the industry that could have been easily removed and should have been as soon as the politicization of the company became apparent. We can be guaranteed the opposition will do their part to shape public and political opinion away from solar. We must be on guard and take action where necessary. It's up to us to play a better offense in this game. With the signs gone, there's nothing to remind us we can't.

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

7 Comments

Register To Comment
Paul DiMaggio
Paul DiMaggio
March 2, 2013
G-Max tidal energy is emerging as a base power provider of electricity. Along with solar, wind, bio, and geo, all forms of alternative energy will eventually be a mainstay in this emerging market. Solyndra should have never left the lab. This "stereo type" created to the masses is a bump in the road for all RE sources, and companies in the process of development. Artificial subsidy afforded to oil and gas by the US treasury, should be aligned with alt En as well. That is the real political objective that will ultimately make this world a better place collectively.
George Horrocks
George Horrocks
February 22, 2013
Rapower's note hits the key points exactly. Solyndra was a technology that costs too much to produce and could not compete. Steve Chu knew it and they recommended against it (indicating that Solyndra, with the loan, would be out of money by September - how prophetic), but it was forced by the President. This is not bad Republicans, good Democrats. This was a singularly bad decision made solely for political expediency. That decision put a black mark on the whole industry. We all are labeled with the same brush stroke - the suggestion that solar can't compete, that is doesn't work. The reality is that Solyndra was the problem and if it wasn't for an Administration that was so insistent on a timed photo-op, we would not be having this discussion. The loan budget was $54 billion; the Solyndra debacle was less than a 1% failure of that. There are not all winners in financial investments, but Solyndra's loan should not have happened. But we do have watchdogs who are there to keep the vandals away and this was the case of theft of the American taxpayer. This was bad business, bad politics. This one bad loan was the exception, not the rule.
frederic pouyot
frederic pouyot
February 21, 2013
Does anyone know what happened to the Solyndra patents and technology. Surely, there is still a market for cylindrical solar PV, either on flat roofs, but also for ground mounted applications. It does not look like anyone is offering that technology. I believe that there is a place for it, even if it does not address all applications.
Michael Campbell
Michael Campbell
February 21, 2013
Hal: Solyndra technology should have never escaped the lab and at 12% efficiency, never influenced ANYONE to lower their prices. PV Price erosion was caused by over capacity- not disruptive technology. The cost to produce Solyndra thin-film on steroids was far too high and its efficiency far too low. This technology could not be mounted on anything but a flat roof, eliminating easily 30% of the total addressable market. Their design was also flawed in that it relied upon regional distribution center type roofs, which have low electrical loads per square foot and therefore are not good candidates for PV without third party demand for the power produced. In the end, Management developed a solution looking for a problem that did not exist. Three months before Solyndra shut their doors, I interviewed for the role of Vice President of Sales. In those interviews, I put forward several industry verticals that could make use of the design and to test drive Solyndra application engineering, a 350kW commercial project on a saw-tooth roof in LA for consideration. The project required drilling a small hole in each cross member at end of the panel frame, allowing for tilted roof applications (penetrating)- although they were desperate to generate revenue, the idea was rejected. At that moment, it was clear Solyndra was doomed, along with my desire to rescue it. If Solyndra developed and manufactured industry standard products, there is a good chance they would still be around. If those responsible for approving the loan had ever installed a PV system, they would have never undermined the goals of the Solar Industry to help this Company.
Hal Slater
Hal Slater
February 21, 2013
Why can't anyone else see that Solyndra was the first panel below $2.50/W which forced the Chinese to drop their prices which snowballed into the sub $1/W prices we have today. With the 30% tax credit (especially under 1603), that price drop saved the US taxpayers many tens of billions per year. There was absolutely nothing sincere in the Republican's attack. Just their hatred for Obama and all other peace-loving people.
JL Mur
JL Mur
February 20, 2013
My understanding is that Solyndra's loss was a drop in the bucket compared to the money the Fossil Fuel Industry gets each year.

Compared to the destruction the Fossil Fuel Industry gets away with, the removal of the signs don't comfort me all that much.
justinemily emilysoni
justinemily emilysoni
February 20, 2013
Solar panels are provided to white house roof for awareness among people. People really using this technology as it saves money and time.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create an Account!
  • Sign-In
Lisa Ann Pinkerton

Lisa Ann Pinkerton

Lisa Ann Pinkerton is founder of Women In Cleantech & Sustainability, a group dedicated to the advancement of women in various environmental and technology sectors. She is also Founder and President of Technica Communications, where she...
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Create a free account and start adding your blogs.

Create an Account

Most Commented

  • 9
    Country-Based Action to Achieve Universal Access to Energy
  • 4
    California Energy Storage Plan May Require $3 Billion Investment
  • 2
    Big Apple Anticipates Solar Explosion for 2013
  • 2
    Is the IRS Considering Solar REITs?

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Green Power Conferences
  • EU PVSEC (European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition)
  • Borrego Solar Systems, Inc.
  • Sunetric
  • Intertek
  • Enphase Energy
  • Festo
  • Northern Lights Solar Solutions
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hydro Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information