Jane Weissman
February 01, 2013
|
0 Comments
Welcome to the confusing and somewhat chaotic world of credentialing! Last month, the result of a marathon endeavor, the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) reached two national milestones in our commitment to credentialing in renewable energy and energy efficiency. Our goal – standardized quality training matched with employer needs – training outcomes that result in marketable, job-related skills.
Together, these accomplishments offer new safeguards for energy consumers, industry, students and government. We released IREC’s new Standard for training programs that offer certificates in the renewable energy and energy efficiency space, and we launched the accreditation program to demonstrate compliance to those requirements, along with our partner the American National Standards Institute (ANSI).
After 24 months of working with a balanced and vocal committee of experts;asking the public for three rounds of comments on the Standard; developing an assessment scheme with ANSI by drilling down to the multiple elements needed; holding a pilot study; and clarifying definitions – we now have a Standard to use and an accreditation process in place. We had to be pretty darn sure that this epic effort had value in building a strong workforce, with training for safety and quality the highest priorities. We did not flinch for a minute. We relished the lively discussions. We tackled the tedious details. And we pushed the envelope further. Here’s why.
We are seeing growth in the clean energy sector, sometimes not as fast as we would like, but definitely growth. Grid-tied photovoltaic installations continue their rise, as does U.S. wind capacity. Spending on energy efficiency programs is expected to double in the next dozen years. All this leads to more jobs. We have a lot of training going on around the country – some good training matched to industry-needed competencies and some not-so-good training leading to unclear learning outcomes. We still struggle with the misrepresentation of certificates as a mark of professional certification. There is a lack of consistency and a plentitude of confusion.
IREC’s training Standard 14732 offers a clear way through this confusion by laying out the requirements for program management, educational processes (instructional design and assessment), and technical content (skills and knowledge taught), with the outcome leading to a market-value certificate.
What is market value? We spent hours debating this. Basically, we want to see that someone who has gone through the training has learned marketable and job-related skills. If you go through training and you walk out with a “certificate,” it has to mean something. A certificate of attendance doesn’t cut it when we are talking about job readiness and market value. IREC Standard 14732 and the ANSI-IREC accreditation program is a step up from IREC’s ISPQ 01022 Standard and scheme. This new Standard and assessment process offers all that IREC’s ISPQ program does and more. Both credentials are a hard-earned seal of approval from a third-party, but the bar continues to be raised with this next chapter in IREC’s commitment to quality assurance.
For more information on IREC’s unique credentialing program, which accredits training institutions and certifies instructors in the renewable energy and energy efficiency fields, visit www.irecusa.org.
Posted from the annual Workforce Development Institute conference/American Association of Community Colleges
Lead image: Tachometer via Shutterstock
The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.