Andrew Savage
January 21, 2013
|
4 Comments
The body of evidence that demonstrates the benefits of solar net metering to retail electric customers continues to grow.
From California and Texas to New York and now Vermont, there is a growing stack of reports that make the financial case for greater deployment of distributed solar generation and net metering.
On the same day that a Vote Solar Initiative report was released, which found that in California solar net metering provides over $92 million in annual benefits to ratepayers, a newly published Vermont report echoed the same growing body of evidence that documents the benefits of solar net metering.
A recent report on New York found that solar PV delivers between a 15-cent and 40-cent benefit to ratepayers and taxpayers. Another report from Texas by the analysts at the The Brattle Group found that the total customer benefits of adding solar capacity in the Lone Star State was valued at more than $520 million.
The Vermont legislature charged the report author, the Vermont Department of Public Service, with determining if there is a cross-subsidization with net metering and other retail customers and to examine any benefits or cost of net metering systems to the distribution and transmission system. The report found that solar net metering is a net-positive for the state — a 4-kW PV fixed system provides a 4.3-cent net societal benefit per kWh generated, and a 4-kW 2-axis PV system provides a net 3.3-cent benefit. A similar conclusion was made for 100kW net metered PV systems. The report addresses the specific ratepayer benefit as well as the statewide, societal benefit.
This conclusion comes even with Vermont’s statewide solar incentive program factored in, which provides an average 20-cent per kilowatt hour value of solar, or an average solar incentive across the state of 5.3 cents above residential retail electric rates.
The report outlines the calculable benefits of solar net metering, primarily:
An additional benefit explicitly not covered in the study is the economic multiplier associated with the local investment and job creation created from the local manufacturing and installation of net metering systems. The report also didn’t cover the statewide benefit of retaining more dollars locally.
Net metering in Vermont has grown by a factor of four since 2008, with solar accounting for 88 percent of all net metering systems. According to the report, most of these systems, or 59 percent, are less than 5kW, and 85 percent are under 10kW. (Vermont recently passed a efficient, first-in-the-nation solar registration program for permitting solar systems 10kW and below.) Even with the growth of net metering in the state, net metering systems still produce less than 1 percent of the 35 GWh of power Vermont uses each year.
Andrew Savage is on the management team of AllEarth Renewables, the Vermont manufacturer of the dual-axis AllSun Tracker.
The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.
2013-01-23 12:29:17.0
I do hope PG&E has been able to improve their back room processes now that they have installed smart meters at their NEM customers locations. I just had my old smart meter replaced. My older (2006) digital E-7 NEM TOU semi smart meter, I paid $277 to have it installed, reported the following information: Date, Time, Total kWh , Total kWh used at peak times, and instantaneous wattage. The old meter did not have external communications capabilities. My new smart meter does have external communication capabilities. At least that is what I have been told by PG&E. Unfortunately, an account hasn't been set up yet for our billing meter at PG&E's web site so I can't confirm if the external communication is functioning (or what information it is capturing for that matter).
It's obvious PG&E didn't have many NEM TOU customers sit in on the design requirements for what the new smart meters should report at the meter. The information reported on my new Meter is: Volts, Total kWh, Instantaneous Wattage reported as Delivered (an arrow shows which way the electrons are flowing) and a -88888 value. The new meter also reports "On" which I assume is the communication port indicating it's sending information. Once PG&E gets the back room work done I will get to confirm this. It is very important for TOU customers to know how well they are doing at managing their load at peak times- the difference in the costs to use (have delivered by PG&E) a kWh in the summer comes to mind. It costs 200% to 300% more $ for E-7 NEM TOU customers to have a kWh of electricity delivered by PG&E at peak times in the summer vs having a kWh delivered at off peak times.