The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Sunday, May 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Is Your Utility Ready? New Report Says Local Solar Could Power 10% of Country in 10 Years

John Farrell
January 04, 2013  |  15 Comments

Within a decade, more than 35 million buildings may be generating their own solar electricity (without subsidies) at prices lower than their utility offers, sufficient to power almost 10% of the country.  

That’s the powerful headline from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance’s latest report, Commercial Rooftop Revolution.  Despite the opportunity, utilities, regulators, and policy makers are largely unprepared for the surge of local solar power.

In Minnesota, for example, the state’s largest utility expects just 20 megawatts of new solar power in the next 13 years, according to its draft filing with the Public Utility Commission.  But within 10 years, according to the report, unsubsidized solar electricity will be so inexpensive that 200 times more solar (over 4,000 megawatts) could be installed on the rooftops of Minnesota homes and businesses, providing lower cost electricity than from the utility.

That’s just one wake up call, among many, in Commercial Rooftop Revolution.  A solar revolution that has been largely confined to states with generous sunshine (California) or high electricity prices (New Jersey) or both (Hawaii) will spread rapidly in the coming years.  Utilities in unexpected states like Tennessee, Wisconsin, and Nebraska will face enormous competition from inexpensive rooftop solar power by 2022.   

Many utilities and state regulatory commissions are finding the value in solar and realizing that perceived barriers aren’t as large as they had feared.  Austin Energy, a Texas municipal utility, now pays a non-subsidy premium for solar because it helps them offset expensive peak power purchases.  In Hawaii, regulators have amended archaic limits to match renewable technology.  California grid legislators increased the amount of solar allowed to use net metering to offset on-site electricity use.  And Colorado and Vermont have capped costs and streamlined solar permitting.  

With a solar market driven by cheaper-than-electricity prices, Hawaii’s electricity system may hint at the forthcoming paradigm change.   One of the state’s public utility commissioners notes that utilities need to transition from being grid dominators to facilitators, from being inflexible to being flexible.  They will need to switch from a reliance on utility-controlled, large, centralized coal and nuclear power plants to a nimble mix of flexible energy sources like energy storage, demand response, or natural gas.   Already, the state is one of 14 states with local or state-based CLEAN Contract (a.k.a. feed-in tariff) policies that dramatically simplify the process of going solar for residential and other electric customers.

With the cost of solar falling rapidly and local solar challenging utility prices nationwide, ILSR’s report suggests that utilities will need to accommodate a grassroots movement toward local, affordable energy generation.  

There will be more change in the next 10 years than utilities have faced in the last 100. And they had best get ready.

See a summary of the report in the slides below: 

Is Your Utility Ready for a Solar Rooftop Revolution? from John Farrell

Lead image: Power lines via Shutterstock

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

15 Comments

Register To Comment
Gregory L Smith
Gregory L Smith
March 1, 2013
Howard, While it is off topic, it is a great idea for using Solar overproduction at a facility so that Hydrogen can be produced as well as 30% Oxygen as well. Recovering the oxygen will be a question that arises...The use of this technology would be best for creating Hybrid Solar-Hydrogen Fuel cell Electricity plants that could use high quality electricity during peak hours from a solar farm and the over-production could go towards the starting of the energy to run the hydrogen separation process, thus eliminating expense to run that portion, and the result would be a fuel cell that could burn the hydrogen during the evening and night periods and totally offset the need for solar at night, thus resulting in consistant energy production for customers and at a cost break and pollution offset rate that would be the envy of all electrical producers. The water generated by the fuel cells could then go back to the starting facility to again be reconverted to hydrogen and there would not be a significant additional use of water resources as a result. That is how solar can support such technology.
Howard Phillips
Howard Phillips
February 28, 2013
Utilities like coal and nuclear. But, WATER, because it contains 67% hydrogen, contains the world's largest energy resource. Getting the hydrogen from the water is the problem. Should we be working more on this?

The world's first CC-HOD hardware and equipment-design conference, April 8, 2013, is based on the demonstration of hydrogen production at 30 gallons/minute using water and scrap materials. Primary purpose of this conference is to host a meeting where hardware designers and R&D product development professionals will be briefed on new CC-HOD methods useful for generating hydrogen at commercially-useful rates. For time, date and agenda for the conference, please see www.PhillipsCompany.4T.com/REG.pdf

The world's first process using catalytic carbon for producing hydrogen-for-fuel from scrap materials was demonstrated earlier this year. A Hydrogen Design Conference will be held on April 8, 2013 to transfer this technology to any company wanting cell design guidelines for commercialization of this technology. Using a new technology, called CC-HOD, hydrogen was produced at several output rates, up to approximately 30 gallons per minute of hydrogen. For a report on this demonstration, please see www.PhillipsCompany.4T.com/CD.pdf

The CC-HOD method for producing hydrogen has the following characteristics:
1. Results in more energy when the hydrogen is used (combusted, burned) than the energy required to generate the hydrogen, and
2. Uses only low-cost and friendly materials (carbon and fuel), and
3. Uses only two fuels — aluminum and water, and
4. Can generate ANY rate (LPM, GPM) of hydrogen, limited only by the hardware design, and
5. Because of the above, eliminates the need for hydrogen storage tanks for most applications, and
6. Can output hydrogen, directly from the cell, at ANY pressure, limited only by the hardware design, and
7. Can produce the hydrogen ON DEMAND, or "HOD."
More info: www.PhillipsCompany.4T.com/HYDROGEN.ht
Gregory L Smith
Gregory L Smith
January 8, 2013
My concept of the future Solar Installation system would include a method of finance that won't break the bank for residential users and will afford banks a way to make safe gains in income, which is needed under the new Bank rules for Basil III. Also I believe both the small business and the residential owner could gain dramatically if the solar products in the next year pan out as I have heard they might. We just have to see how the Solar manufacturers like Solar One and Sun Power get this technology and develop the higher efficiencies we believe they can achieve out of the box...The Solar business model then, would be more flexible since you will have some dually flexible products such as built-in mini-inverters and full scale inverters that have the flexibility of upward inversion capability if the products begin to show up those double or triple amperage outputs. It will need some education for all installers also that NABCEP should start looking at immediately, since Three phase installs would be dramatically impacted and you might have some fires if they do not get right sizing of inverter packages. But these are good problems to have, and I am hoping you guys will stay in the mix and share your ideas, as we all get better when we tell our opinions and our views about what might work better. There are business owners out there already just hoping for such an outcome, so let's not disappoint them! Best outcomes this year! ~Gregor S. OFFER SUN
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 6, 2013
Just enough legislation to force utility companies to treat end-user/producers like any other producer with power to sell. Stick Joe and Jane Homeowner in the merit order mix along with XYZ nuclear plant and ABC gas peaker plant.

At times XYZ might pay the Homeowners to curtail. Lots of the time the Homeowners are going to give ABC financial pains. (And save the grid money.)

The grid constantly deals with changes in supply and demand. The only real decision is where to access the supply needed to match demand.
Kimberly Davis
Kimberly Davis
January 6, 2013
".... move the unneeded power to other buildings"....that will need a lot of legislation.

Electricity transmission is instantaneous. Therefore we need the grid to provide time-shifting for transmission v. use.
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 6, 2013
I'd suggest we start rethinking rooftop solar. Stop thinking about the appropriate size array for the building underneath and start thinking about the entire portion of the roof which does not face the street as valuable solar real estate. Places to put lots of panels and have no transmission costs.

Roughly 1/4th of 'rear roofs' face south, 1/2 either east or west. East/west facing roofs produce about 80% of the power as a south-facing roof but extend the solar day earlier/later.

We can afford to let the street-facing roofs stay "pretty".

Cover the entire roof (except for an edge walkway for fire fighters. Use the existing grid connections to move the unneeded power to other buildings. Pay roof owners the same rate as other producers, smart meters and computers make the record keeping/payment costs close to zero.

What apartment buildings can't produce can be produced on top of suburban single family homes.

And big-box places pretty much always have big parking lots. Plenty of space for parking shelters with solar roofs. People appreciate being able to park out of the weather.

--

I think it more accurate to talk about the grid providing fill-in supply, not storage. At this point the grid stores little. During the dark hours the solar home owner is using freshly generated power, not stored power.
Kimberly Davis
Kimberly Davis
January 6, 2013
Assuming we're talking DG here, increased panel efficiency will provide greater flexibility in right-sizing projects to match the site's energy use. While 4-5kW can make a good dent in a single-family home, a big-box commercial site with refrigeration and other large power pulls are unlikely to house an adequate solar system to approach 100% offset.

And Bob, I wish for the day when grid-tied net-metered solar has achieved sufficient grid penetration that we need storage! In the meantime,the grid serves as storage.
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 6, 2013
Personally, I try to not get my hopes too high until product has been flowing out of plant for a while and has proven itself.

Increases in solar panel efficiency would be great, but they aren't really necessary. We're just above PV at 50 cents/watt and heading toward 30. More efficient panels would help bring down BOS costs, but solar is well on its way to 5 cents per kWh with today's technology.

What we need is a cheap storage solution. What would totally turn the grid on its heels would be for Ambri's liquid metal battery to pan out. Dirt cheap storage that could be distributed around the grid (even at the wind farm level) would revolutionize things.

But, unfortunately, there aren't any Ambri liquid metal batteries hooked to the grid yet....
Gregory L Smith
Gregory L Smith
January 6, 2013
Technology has an unspoken part here that as yet hasn't been heard, so here is my point of view from the side of technology, within the next three years...MIT and the NREL labs at Berkley, have new and very affordable ways to expand the value of solar, nearly immediately, if manufacturers are convinced this will do what they say it will do...namely enhance the collection of solar energy and expand the efficiency of solar by a factor of 3-4 times! It means that a solar panel that now gets just 17% efficiency can expect as much as a 4 fold improvement in collection and redistribution of that energy into electricity. That means that the least efficient solar can become better overnight than the very best solar we have at present! So you may just have to shorten your scope of expansion if this holds to be true for manufacturers, not just in theory...The technical breakthroughs are wave-modification overlays that improve solar capabilities by 3X, Solar modifications of non-silicon substrates, that reduce cost for each new array or module/panel made to nearly 1/2 the price, and Quantum dot materials that focus cascading electrons along wider electron pathways, ensuring that solar energy goes into electricity instead of into heat. If you combine all these technologies into one module, you get a product that may have a 70-90% energy efficiency under normal conditions, not under test-laboratory conditions! So, why aren't you guys reading about MIT and the NREL labs results? I am stunned it hasn't sunk in yet! The war is over and Solar has hit the motherlode! I am not joking, I do have sound science backing me up, so shouldn't we be celebrating? I think so! Gregor Smith OFFER SUN gregors@att.net
Phil Manke
Phil Manke
January 5, 2013
Thanks, KV, but I'm full up and fortunate on solar. I just get curious when writers and self serving brokers and politicians promote the status quo. There are some ideas around that do work well, but are unused because of, (IMO), a plethora of poor ideas motivated by graft. IMO, SRECs would move solar big time without tapping government funds or 'Ute' treasuries because most of the latter already pay some form of carbon tax, but make sure it comes back to themselves for their own RE programs. If states would merely set a 'solar carve-out' and an SACP with their RES the stage would be set for massive solar adoption without need for cost raising certification programs like SRCC or NABCEP. No one would want solar hardware that is not producing, and generous SRECs would maintain the pathway for 'guaranteed production installations'.. How is this not a viable way for moving forward?
Kimberly Davis
Kimberly Davis
January 5, 2013
Bob, yes, the first poster may have been referring to lease/PPA & third-party ownership, where savings could be realized the first month.

The second poster seemed to be envisioning buying a system - Phil Manke, there may be lease/PPA solar firms in your area who can help you achieve your solar goals!

With your reference to the system being "paid off", tho - the customer's savings are thought of as credited towards the initial cost until that payoff point is reached, when it's all gravy... (This holds true regardless of $/watt, price of electricity, irradiation, financing or no....)
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
January 5, 2013
kv - It is likely that you would be saving money before your system is paid off. The cost of grid power will increase over time. Electricity at 12 cents per kWh today will average 16 cents over 20 years at 3% inflation.

A $4/watt solar system with the 30% FTC, financed at 4% over 20 years and installed in a modestly sunny part of the country (4.2 avg hours) would produce electricity at 13.7 cents. So before the system would be half paid for savings would be realized.

In a sunny part of the US, where the average solar day is 5 hours, you start saving from day one with your system cranking out power at 11.6 cents per kWh.
Kimberly Davis
Kimberly Davis
January 5, 2013
@Ryan: Even with the 30% Investment Tax Credit (ITC), there will be a few years until the capital investment is paid off before it is offset by the lower electricity bills.
@Phil: Check the DSIRE.org map and click on your state to see what solar incentive programs may be available to you. The 30% ITC is described on the 'federal' page. So if you had installed a 4kW system @ $4/w = $16,000, you could take a $4800 credit on your income taxes.
@Angus: Grid-tied net-metered systems essentially use the grid as storage. Because electricity transmission is instantaneous, storage is not usually cost-effective unless necessary for other reasons. Happily, peak generation often coincides with peak use. (This assumes the system is sized to approximate the site's use. Buildings like churches with only a few days/week use can present other issues, except in states which buy excess power like MD.)
Angus Campbell
Angus Campbell
January 5, 2013
This may be a turning point in home power generation. What is needed next is storage capacity for off peak power generation and this is where the grid would come into play. Excess power during off peak times could be bought, stored at a central site and re-transmitted back into the grid during peak usage times. Home owners could store this power for a fee until they need it rather than buying it back at the going electricity rates. I guess you could compare it to parking fees for cars.
Phil Manke
Phil Manke
January 4, 2013
Web can only hope, John. Do you have any insights how adopters may cover the cost of solar?............ Without a way to cover the cost of money to install equipment to provide power, I don't see how masses may be motivated into the solar energy paradigm.......... Or do you see it as a corporate track funded by insider knowledge of priviledged funding programs or FIT's?

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
John Farrell

John Farrell

John Farrell directs the Energy Self-Reliant States and Communities program at ILSR and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits of local ownership and dispersed generation of renewable energy. His latest paper,...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Create a free account and start adding your blogs.

Create an Account

Most Commented

  • 55
    Energy Expert Predicts Solar Could Upend Major Utility in California on Price
  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 12
    Massachusetts Solar: Healthy Mix of Business Sense, Environmental Awareness and Public Engagement

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Canadian Solar Inc.
  • US Solar Institute
  • SolarEstimate.org
  • ReneSola
  • Valentin Software, Inc - providing Solar Design Software
  • Planet Solar Inc
  • Apricus, Inc.
  • Creotecc Solar Mounting Systems
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information