Right at the end of last year, on 29 December, wind power in France covered a record 10% of the country’s electricity demand, the French blog “habitat durable” reported. France’s wind power fleet reached a power production equivalent to 5,982 MW – the same level as six nuclear reactors.
During the month of December in general, wind energy met 4% of France’s electricity needs, and in 2012 the average level was 3% – meeting the electricity needs of 6 million people.
“Wind energy production during recent weeks illustrates the characteristic trait of French wind energy: every year, wind energy production is higher during the coldest months,” the blog said.
France is the world’s most nuclear dependent country – currently 75% of its electricity is produced by its 58 reactors. But, during his election campaign last year to become President of France, François Hollande pledged to cut that share to 50% by 2025 by boosting renewables.
One fact that could have motivated Hollande’s pledge is that the French Court of Auditors released a report early last year showing that the cost of French nuclear would rise to €90/MWh – more expensive than onshore wind power. The report also highlighted massive uncertainties over the future costs of decommissioning old plants and waste treatment.
At the end of 2011 France had a total wind energy capacity of 6.8 GW and the government, in its National Renewable Energy Action Plan to meet the EU’s 20% renewable energy target, set a target of 25 GW by 2020, including 6 GW offshore. The majority of French wind power can be found in Picardie, Centre, Languedoc-Roussillon, Champagne-Ardenne, Lorraine and Brittany.
This blog was originally published on EWEA Blog and was republished with permission.
Lead image: Wind turbines via Shutterstock
The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.