The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Saturday, May 25, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Get Ready, Utilities: Solar is Coming

John Farrell
December 11, 2012  |  14 Comments

Quick question.  Your state has good sunshine, lots of open rooftops, and the cost of solar energy has been falling by 10% per year.  Do you think it will take 13 years to double the 10 megawatts (MW) of installed solar power?

Yes, if you’re the largest corporate utility in my state, and willfully ignoring the economic trend.  But ‘no’ if you make decisions based on data, because the price of unsubsidized solar electricity will undercut most utility retail electricity prices within a decade, enabling 200 times more solar (4,400 MW) than found in this utility’s plans.

That’s just one utility’s wake up call in a new report from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR), Commercial Rooftop Revolution, and it’s far from the only one.  By 2016, over 100,000 MW of unsubsidized rooftop solar will able to match grid electricity on price.  Within 10 years, it will be 300,000 MW, enough to provide 10% of the nation’s electricity.  This affordable solar future presents a stark challenge to traditional utility planning and a clarion call for better electricity policy.

Some utilities have responded by clinging to the 20th century paradigm of centralized control.  Virginia’s Dominion Power, for example, expressed satisfaction at a recent conference at introducing standby charges on solar producers, ostensibly to help them recover the cost of “backing up” solar power.

On the other hand, many utilities and state regulatory commissions are finding the value in solar and realizing that perceived barriers aren’t as large as they had feared.  Austin Energy, a Texas municipal utility, now pays a non-subsidy premium for solar because it helps them offset expensive peak power purchases.  In Hawaii, utilities who two years ago argued that the distribution grid was at its limit have been managing to accommodate thousands more solar projects on their grid systems.

Regardless of their predisposition toward solar power, utilities, regulators, and policy makers need to recognize that there’s a revolution in electricity systems coming soon.  Solar will become so affordable in the next 5-10 years that as many as 38 million homes and businesses will elect to produce their own power more cheaply from unsubsidized solar rather than buy it from their utility.  That means policies that limit distributed generation will have to change: net metering limits must rise, permitting must be simplified, archaic “15% rules” will have to be driven by data not speculation.

Ultimately, as one Hawaii public utility commissioner has said, the paradigm for the electricity system will flip. Utilities will need to transition from being inflexible to being flexible.  They’ll switch from primarily running slow-response coal and nuclear power plants to finding the right mix of flexible natural gas or energy storage systems that can partner with low-cost wind and solar and advanced demand response to supply reliable electricity.

The forthcoming revolution in solar power promises more change in the next 10 years than utilities have faced in the last 100.  And they had best get ready.

 

Lead image: Rooftop solar via Shutterstock

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

14 Comments

Register To Comment
Daniel Ferra
Daniel Ferra
January 16, 2013
Mr Smolinski, thank you, for the double check, I have removed the post on the EV and their 60% increase, from the petition, we do have to make sure what we say is real and accurate. Good Job.
Mark Smolinski
Mark Smolinski
January 16, 2013
Mr Ferra,
I used my wife's FB (I don't FB) to follow your link and sign your petition...and my family thinks I am a green geek. You got me beat in spades. More power to you. If interested, you can check out our green efforts at http://www.sensitivedentistry.net/green.html

Regardless of individual data points (my quote or your contact), I think it is a BAD idea to highlight anything that might be perceived as counter productive to EV adoption in an effort to advance solar PV. The whack jobs are finding any way they can to keep the oil barons rich and keep us highly dependent on the middle east. I suggest you watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ChG4q9wBNA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EfPbUI3TLE
Issa is from your fine state of Ca and I would venture to say that a great many Americans would vote him out of office if we had a say in the matter (especially after the crap he did with Sandy funding just recently).
It is sensational to tell people that their bills are going up 60% when you don't, at the same time, mention how much their gasoline expenditures will go DOWN- and that conservation alone may be enough to offset the couple hundred extra kwh they will be using in their EV.
Daniel Ferra
Daniel Ferra
January 15, 2013
Mr Smolinski, Thank you for bring this up, I spoke with a Nissan Leaf owner, a sales person who also owns a Leaf, here in Palm Springs, he said his electric bill was around $100.00-$110.00 per month before his purchase, and is $150.00 give or take a few bucks, I will be researching and reevaluating the current data, and make the change, Thank you. PS The 60% was only 10% off on only one sample, it was not an Sensationalized number.
Mark Smolinski
Mark Smolinski
January 15, 2013
Mr Ferra,
The Chevy Volt is MISLABELED as a 'hybrid'. It is a vehicle whose drivers do the vast majority of their driving on electricity and, therefore, would directly relate to the concept of allegedly increasing that utility bill that your comment is about. Watching this car be at the center of political attacks, like the NHTSA hearing, I have learned that little about the world of EV evaluation can be trusted regarding outsiders. 'Studies' mean nothing- especially given the date of 1/11, when there were effectively NO EVs on the road to discuss. If you want to learn about PRACTICAL effects, and speak with authority on what EV usage does to a utility bill, you need to go to the owner websites (GM-Volt or mynissanleaf) and peruse whenever newcomers ask 'what happens to my utility bill'. I learned LOTS about California's rates just by reading owner comments. You have remarkable incentive to use off peak charging and many utilities install second meters, accordingly. A number of owners state that their bills went DOWN because of the tiered systems and off peak charging.

Here is a quote:
'After buying the Volt, my SDG&E bill went down from an average of $175/month to $136/month (though there's a new refrigerator in the equation, too). That's because in my area - San Diego - owning a plug-in entitled me to a new set of rates. I went from a 4-tier billing plan with a peak of 33c/kWh to a time-of-use plan with a peak of 25c/kWh, but with a super off peak rate of 14c. It happens that my home's usage happened to hit the numbers just right.

One could almost say that I not only drive free, but get a rebate.'

As previously stated, you sensationalize by providing your 60% figure and the 'study' CANNOT be based on REAL WORLD usage, because its numbers CANNOT have been obtained when people were driving Volts or Leaf or anything else that has been sold in substantive numbers. No point arguing with me; as I said, I am on your side about the rooftop solar issue.
Daniel Ferra
Daniel Ferra
January 15, 2013
Mr Smolinski, the Study I quote is from Purdue University published in the Energy Policy Journal 2011. In California we have a tiered electrical rate system starting at 13 cents a kilowatt and topping out at 33 cents per kilowatt hour. How much do you pay for electricity ? and what State do you live in ? It is not a gross exaggeration or purposely misleading, I am quoting from the article, have you read the article ? Thank you for making me double check, The Chevy Volt is a hybrid, my point is centered on the all electric vehicle.
Mark Smolinski
Mark Smolinski
January 15, 2013
Mr Ferra,
I don't know what your point was about electric bills and EVs, but the result is highly inaccurate. Many 'studies' are highly suspect in both motivation and funding. Go to the GM-Volt.com site and you'll find that those of us who ACTUALLY OWN electric vehicles will NOT corroborate your 60% increase comment- or anything close to it. Behavior of those buying EVs is accompanied by evaluation of electrical usage, as well as time of use to off peak hours. Many of us become solar PV owners. Regardless of 'studies', EV owners IN PRACTICE often end up with more kwh than when we started, because of conservation. I won't nickle and dime the concept, but a gross over exaggeration of 60% increase is sensational to say the least, and purposefully misleading as a possibility. I laud your efforts of PV ownership and have much installed PV myself, but don't use the EV card as any kind of justification. It distracts from your purpose.
Gary McCallum
Gary McCallum
December 13, 2012
With a strong solar advocacy in the comments I urge anybody who has not see it already visit the Orion Solartech website and view a new solar energy system. It produces electricity, hot water, raises efficiency to an optimal 50%, makes the roof, provides a structural element and is suitable for rain water collection.
It is a green architects/builders dream.
Read the OVERVIEW and look at the 17 drawings under the DETAILS tab for a good understanding.
Thomas M
Thomas M
December 13, 2012
'... in the next 5-10 years that as many as 38 million homes and businesses will elect to produce their own power more cheaply from unsubsidized solar rather than buy it from their utility.'

This is the mindset that should be the norm, not worrying about rebates, feed in tarrifs, subsidies and the like. The public needs to be informed that the cost to install smaller, more affordable systems for personal use is the way to go. Why do you want support the companies that you are trying to get away from by giving them all the power you produce? Do you really think that these companies are not going to change their policies if the people feel that they must feed into the grid? Just think of television. At one time, television reception was free. Then when they got you hooked, they make you pay for it. Just like prohibition. Once they find out what people want, they make it illegal, after we fight to get it back, they give it to us only to use it against us. Same could happen to off grid. It seems that they are ahead of the game this time, skipping the off grid scenario and jumping straight to using grid tie against us, by making us pay to tie in.
Solar energy is the first step to free energy. Something they don't want, yet is available to those in the know. These are the ones who have to step up and spread the word. We the people also have to step up and protect these people who are trying to get the word out. Useless banter over government involvement is a waste of hot air which could be used for public good instead.
And once again, where is solar hot water and passive gain in the equation?
Daniel Ferra
Daniel Ferra
December 13, 2012
Petition Background
California law does not allow home owners to size their Solar systems larger than what they use. In order to get the California Solar Initiative (CSI) rebate, the customer is not allowed to install a system that inherently over-produces more than what is needed for his home.
The Feed-in Tariff can not be earned if you receive a rebate from your utility company for solar panels or if you are participating in other utility solar incentives programs such as the CSI. It also can not be earned if you are participating in net metering, which only pays one time a year under the AB 920 California Solar Surplus Act.
Our Feed-In Tariff should mirror Germany, Japan, and Hawaii where residential FIT is 21 cents - 54 cents per kilowatt hour.
The 5 cents per kwh currently administered as a one-time-a-year payment is not adequate and stops our own citizens from participating in our struggle to reduce green house gases.
The California Public Utility commission can change the FIT to 25 cents per kwh, and distribute the solution to all tax-paying citizens, who should not be deliberately handcuffed. Residential home owners should be allowed to oversize their Renewable Energy systems and participate in the State mandated goal to achieve 33% renewable energy by 2020.
California resident who purchase an electric vehicle can expect a 60% increase in their electric bill, as shown by a study done by Purdue University in summer of 2010.
Due to these laws, we have automatically taken out over 8 million roof tops, that would generate over 11,500MW of power, thats 5 San Onofre nuclear power plants.
We need to let our tax paying, Home Owning citizens in on a Feed in Tariff that pays 25 cents per kwh., and allow Homeowners to oversize their Renewable Energy Systems.
In the spirit of Bill McKibben and 350.org for our children and eaarth, lets make real global sustaining changes for all of us.
Go to Facebook, Daniel Ferra, Palm Springs Ca. to sign petition
Daniel Ferra
Daniel Ferra
December 13, 2012
Hello, we need a National Feed in Tariff, for Solar, Wind, with laws that level the playing field, this petition starts with homeowners in California. Japan, Germany, and our state of Hawaii, will pay residents between 21- 54 cents per kilowatt hour, here in California they will pay us 5 cents per kilowatt hour, and they wont let us oversize our Solar systems, want to change our Feed in Tariff? Campaign to allow Californian residents to sell electricity obtained by renewable energy for a fair pro-business market price. Will you read, sign, and share this petition?

http://signon.org/sign/let-california-home-owners
David Carl
David Carl
December 13, 2012
Geraldr, economics drives the homeowner also. Another drag on solar is the hype that it will be much cheaper tomorrow. Why invest $50,000 today when I think it will cost $40,000 next year?

I agree that aesthetics play a part for the homeowner. I like trees. The builder stripped all trees from my lot. I planted trees. Today I don't have enough sun to install PV. While I can not generate my own electricity, my cooling bills are much lower than my neighbors.

Yes, natural gas is a relatively cheap way to produce electricity. It is also much easier to ramp up production than coal. That is why it is used for peaking. Any fuel used for peaking is at a price disadvantage because you have about 12 hours of production to pay off the capital cost while base load units have 24 hours.
Tim Dolan
Tim Dolan
December 12, 2012
If I understand the first comment correctly in the last paragraph, you are saying that the utility will have to treat a regional area as a single integrated power plant for planning purposes for stability and generation purposes and if so I agree with you.

In fact the more small PV arrays you have distributed about a regional area, the more predictable the power generation is and in some respects the more stable it is.

I believe that utility companies need to change from being power generation/suppliers to power assurance suppliers. They should be the ones investing in energy storage technology and capabilities and grid improvements as their primary responsibility for the future and encourage individuals/businesses to pay for the power generation capability to feed the grid. I believe it will also make it cheaper for the utility in storm recovery in the long run, plus there is the added benefit of enhanced nation security, by not having one large target for idiots to go after.
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
December 12, 2012
One important realization: commercial businesses run almost entirely on economics. If PV technology achieves a return for them, they'll do it. Unlike potential residential users whose considerations might run to aesthetics, climate change denial, etc. One of the consequences of TOU pricing and demand charges, something utilities went along with because it provided a means of increasing revenues as much as anything else, is that they provide a true economic incentive for local generation.

But don't expect utilities to quietly surrender the profit to be made from power retailing with the attendant advantage of monopoly. There are many tricks of the trade to be dealt with starting with commercial pricing that is essentially subsidized by residential rates.

Also, don't expect governments to readily surrender the tax revenues derived from utility power sales. Just like the utility that came up with 'standby charges' some local governments have devised 'production taxes' for rooftop solar.

Arbitrary caps on solar power should be knocked down. When you compare time-based electricity demand in the US Southwest to insolation, it is clear that a 'scientific' PV capacity would be at least half of average demand.

One interesting factoid: NG is touted as a low cost energy source and yet much of the electricity produced by NG generators is sold at premium peak rates. Sounds like a good deal - don't expect this to fade any time soon.
Tom Adams
Tom Adams
December 12, 2012
Utilities and regulators are going to have to restructure rates so that fixed costs are no collected in usage charges. If they don't, people unable to install solar systems (e.g. renters, low income consumers, business start-ups, etc.) will be cross-subsidizing those with solar systems.

Another thing that utilities are going to have to do is to do their reliability designs and operations on the basis of all the wind and solar in the regional grid operating as one single power plant. All the talk about wind and solar being decentralized supply is true from the perspective of ownership, but not true from the perspective of grid operations.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
John Farrell

John Farrell

John Farrell directs the Energy Self-Reliant States and Communities program at ILSR and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits of local ownership and dispersed generation of renewable energy. His latest paper,...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Create a free account and start adding your blogs.

Create an Account

Most Commented

  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Texas Legislature Passes Commercial and Industrial PACE Bill
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • SolarEdge Technologies
  • Rich Hessler Business Development
  • Helios Solar Works
  • Solar Energy International (SEI)
  • ImagineSolar
  • Prudent Living, Inc.
  • Panasonic Eco Solutions North America
  • Texas Combined Heat & Power Initiative
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information