The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Mayor Mike Bloomberg (and Sandy) Make It Okay to Mention Solar and Climate Change…Again

Tor 'Solar Fred' Valenza
November 02, 2012  |  8 Comments

It’s devastating to see my hometown of New York so crippled by Hurricane Sandy. There are so many tragedies from this one event. Not only was there an estimated $50 billion in economic losses, but at least 38 people have died in the city alone.

For these and other reasons, New York’s billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg finally brought climate change back to the forefront of our national conversation by publicly endorsing President Obama as the best candidate to act and help prevent future losses of life, property, and business productivity.

As a powerful and successful businessman and politician, Mayor Bloomberg has made it okay (again) to openly discuss climate change in the press. Should solar companies too?

I think yes. But it will have to be done in ways that are climate solution oriented. Price will remain the biggest driver of solar sales decisions, but Bloomberg’s leadership should make it less controversial to discuss solar as a solution for climate change.

Solar companies indirectly address climate change already by providing carbon offset savings with commercial and residential solar quotes. Yet, global warming is rarely mentioned with these carbon counting graphics. So, perhaps it’s time to update that verbiage to include how “your new solar system will prevent X amount of carbon, and will help reduce the effects of climate change.”

Additionally, here are some other communication strategies that may help:

  • Show and promote how safe solar is in extreme weather conditions. When properly installed, solar panels can withstand wind, rain, hale, heavy snow, and even floods. If your area is likely to be in the path of increased extreme weather, be sure to communicate how your solar products are designed to perform with these natural disasters. This not only applies to installers, but to solar products. In fact, wouldn't it be interesting to find out how your panels and inverters survived Sandy? If they did well, that's something to celebrate and promote. If there were issues, learn about these faults and redesign the next generation with new anti-climate change enhancements.
  • Don’t debate climate change in literature or in person. It’s not your job to convince prospects that climate change exists. Instead, just communicate that solar is a benefit for reducing the effects of climate change. Period. If your prospect wants to engage you about the science, they’re probably looking for a debate, not a solar installation. If you think they’re serious about buying solar, steer the conversation to the other added values of solar: energy savings, energy independence, and less pollution.
  • Promote your company’s climate change efforts. If you’re going to promote solar being a climate change solution, your company will have to walk the walk, too. Promote and publicize your car-pooling efforts. Convert cars and trucks to hybrids and electric vehicles, and publicize those efforts, as well. Donate to the Red Cross, or better yet, do a fundraiser for their relief efforts.
  • Publicly support politicians who support action on climate change solutions. Every year, you have an opportunity to vote for local and federal representatives that support climate change energy solutions, such as wind and solar. Be public about your support for pro-climate change solution politician, and tie a press release to your candidate’s legislative actions or proposed actions on climate change.
  • Join coalitions of businesses that support climate change action. Are there like-minded businesses in your city that are doing their part to reduce climate change effects? Support each other and publicize your mutual efforts. “Our solar company supports Joe’s Restaurant and The Big City Hotel for their actions to reduce the effects of climate change. Please join us and become their patrons.” Obviously, Joe’s and Big City Hotel should support you in the same way.
  • Always find ways to commend climate solutions in the news, especially solar solutions. Similar to the above, if a huge and unrelated conglomerate does something huge for solar and/or climate change, stand with them. Write a press release or letter to the editor congratulating Wal-Mart, Ikea, and other big brands for going solar. Tell your customers and prospects about it too, and why you think it’s important. Their big brand credibility will help reinforce the idea that solar works and can be relied on as a climate change solution.
  • Find ways to publicize the cumulative carbon offsets of your solar work. Every website should have a visual graphic that shows how much carbon you’ve installed out of the atmosphere, helping clean the air and cool the planet. You might even want to commission an infographic. Bottom line, show quantitative, graphic, visual symbols of your climate solution efforts. A picture’s worth a 1000 words, plus it encourages sharing on social networks.

While I offer these climate solution communication strategies, don’t do them because you think it’s a solar marketing gimmick. It’s not. I’ve written before about how solar companies need to have a defined purpose, and acting as a climate change solution for the benefit of current and future generations can be part of your purpose. If you don’t think of yourself in that way and use the above, customers will probably see through it and mistrust your other communications, so forget about it.  Besides, if you only believe in selling lots of solar, ultimately, the effects reducing global warming are the same.

As always, I urge you to UnThink Solar—and UnThink climate change too.

Tor Valenza a.k.a. “Solar Fred” advises solar companies on marketing, communications, and branding. Want more solar marketing info? Sign up for the Solar Fred Marketing Newsletter, or contact Solar Fred through UnThink Solar. You can also follow @SolarFred on Twitter.

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

8 Comments

Register To Comment
Doug Hendren
Doug Hendren
November 13, 2012
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.abstract
Report April 2010 from National Academy of Science reports: "97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.

I agree, there should really be no debate on this topic. What we need is solutions.
TRAVIS SAGERT
TRAVIS SAGERT
November 13, 2012
@dhhendren Citation needed on that 95% number, please. Also, could you find one thats broken down as to groups not paid by a specific interest (thus possible biased results)?
TRAVIS SAGERT
TRAVIS SAGERT
November 13, 2012
@SolarFred; you're probably one of the most literate people on this site, but you *do* have to realize, some "climate deniers" like myself would be more apt to believe it if;
1. There werent so many deniers in the scientific community
2. There werent so many deniers that were believers previously
3. The money trail always seems to follow the climate-change-is-happening groups (and partisan/biased/political groups as the origin of funding)
4. These results didnt always seem to end up as some tax or restriction that has little do do with anything ut the tax or restriction itself.

Nobody is "for" dirty air and water or running out of resources (except me, jokingly saying we should use up all the fossil fuels so we MUST go to green energy), but when you look at the whole picture, and what little is really being done here besides give a platform for a politician to run on, and the disastrous tax-money giveaways to failing green companies, will make a fiscally aware public begin to reject investing in green energy, no matter the consequences.

A good PR move would be to have the benefits and costs available per project, per state, country, etc., what the cost is, who pays for it, and the cost and amount of fossil fuels it replaces, and any savings that are passed along to the consumer/beneficiary. Some people simply dont care, and will never care about things they dont "see". This will help solidify support for green energy, REMOVING the "I dont care" factor.

The end result is the same; who cares if its supported or not for climate-change reasons, if supporters still deny climate change, like me? Right?
Tor 'Solar Fred' Valenza
Tor 'Solar Fred' Valenza
November 5, 2012
Bill, the science is settled for me, and I think if we act that way and ignore the climate deniers, it will be a better use of our resources. I don't think the climate deniers will ever be convinced until their own homes and/or businesses are affected, and even then, they will not blame carbon based energy, but natural cycles based on cherry picked data.

Once again, I don't want to get into that cause debate. I'd rather be working towards solutions, i.e., solar, and educating people about solar. If anyone wants to debate it, do it on this site:

http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

There you can find a database of science papers that refute every skeptical argument, and you can comment there as well.

On this blog post, let's keep moving toward effective solar/climate communication strategies.
William Fitch
William Fitch
November 5, 2012
Hi:

Fred, I think everyone "gets" what salesman are about. They don't take sides. They only care about the sales, I.E. money. And that is fine if that defines your personality, as it must to be a salesperson. You have to ignore all cause and effect that does not effect the sales. Global warming is a slam dunk. A.L.E.C., the American Legislative Exchange Council, the US Chamber on steroids if you wish, put out an inside document, which was physically show on TV (Not by them) that is titled, "Warming up to Climate Change". The document was about making profit from Climate Change, like Arctic Drilling just for starters. Everyone knows why the misinformation denying Global Warming exists. To prevent regulation. Period. Maximize Profit, SALES, no matter what the human cost! SO yes, I can appreciate you wanting to put the blinders on regarding the VERY CAUSE of the RE struggle you are fighting, INCLUDING SOLAR, but to me whether is is denial for profit by O&G to suppress YOU or whether it is YOU denying they are doing it because you as an individual are helpless to stop them, I find the "D" word offensive. And by the way, when you up top used the statement, "but I would like to avoid a debate here about the cause of climate change", you played right into their objective. For as everyone knows, they don't need to win the debate for them to win. They win by creating one through mis-information and lying....
And as a TOTAL OFF TRACK REMARK, tomorrow will set the future for a very long time on how hard the RE struggle that FRED is trying to overcome will persist.

.....Bill
Tor 'Solar Fred' Valenza
Tor 'Solar Fred' Valenza
November 3, 2012
Thank you anonymous and Dr Hendren for commenting, but I would like to avoid a debate here about the cause of climate change. This post is about helping solar companies to communicate about solar as solution for climate change. Debating whether it's man made or caused by other theories is not going to help solar companies to promote and communicate about the benefits of solar energy, and that's the purpose of this post (and most of my posts.)

There are many websites for debating the science, but please don't make that place here. As I mentioned above, if you don't want to use the above suggestions...don't. On the other hand, if you have more suggestions for promoting solar as a solution for climate change, then please do comment. That's the focus of this post, not the science, so I sincerely hope all readers will keep to that specific topic. Thank you.
Doug Hendren
Doug Hendren
November 3, 2012
Most (>95%) of the scientists studying climate science believe that it is conclusive. Certainly more conclusive than the great majority of medical studies upon which various interventions are based. It is the nature of true science to always be open to challenge when more data and a better hypothesis appear. Saying it is "not conclusive" is the kind of logic that kept tobacco companies out of court for nearly 30 years, after we knew perfectly well cigarettes caused cancer and heart disease. The scientific data are compelling enough to act right now. Your grandchildren will thank you. -Doug Hendren, MD, MBA
ANONYMOUS
November 3, 2012
Nobody denies climate change, the question is how much does human activity contribute to it and what can be done about it. Could it be that the Sun is a far more important player? The science is not conclusive. It's worrisome that this is in the Political Arena rather than a scientific one. I'm just sayin!!

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
UnThink Solar

UnThink Solar

UnThink Solar is a strategic solar marketing and communications company. Clients include Panasonic, One Block Off the Grid, Free Hot Water and other solar PV and Thermal companies who desire to stand out in an increasing competitive solar...
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • ABOUT US
  • WEBSITE
  • CONTACT US
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Create a free account and start adding your blogs.

Create an Account

Most Commented

  • 13
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?
  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 7
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Navigant
  • Apricus, Inc.
  • Sunetric
  • Kipp & Zonen
  • marcus evans
  • Admirals Bank
  • Trojan Battery Company
  • Solmetric Corporation
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information