The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Friday, May 24, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

The Truth about Germany's Coal

Paul Hockenos
September 12, 2012  |  11 Comments

One downside of Germany’s switch to renewables while weaning itself off of nuclear power is that it must rely on coal — the dirtiest, most carbon-intensive fossil fuel — as the main back-up for its renewable energy supply, which is intermittent given the weather-linked nature of solar and wind sources. As it happens, soft lignite coal in particular, which Germany has in abundance, is one of the worst offenders for greenhouse gas emissions.

Energiewende critics gleefully point to the fact that Germany is building even more new plants that burn coal. Just recently, Germany’s environment minister was beaming at the opening of a new coal plant, which he boasted was much cleaner than old-fashioned models. In point of fact, they are cleaner — but just a little cleaner. Importantly, they can ramp up relatively quickly, providing a flexible complement to intermittent renewables.

Gas, the least polluting fossil fuel, would be the logical choice, but since gas plants are no longer profitable, nobody is building them at the moment (this has to change, by hook or by crook. More on that in an upcoming post). Meanwhile because of the collapsing cost of carbon permits, there’s little penalty for burning coal. This has to change too.

But what’s not said is that the new coal burning plants are replacing (not adding to) the older plants that either have been or will soon be decommissioned. Moreover, by 2020, 18.5 gigawatts of coal power capacity will be decommissioned, whereas only 11.3 gigawatts will be newly installed. Most of the new capacity is expected to come from gas turbines, assuming they find somebody to build them.

Also: Germany's emissions of carbon dioxide edged down by 2.2% last year, even though its use of coal rose by 4.9 percent. Moreover, it is simply not possible for Germany to increase its carbon emissions from the power sector because emissions trading sets limits on emissions.

What’s also true though is that if the nukes had stayed online, Germany’s emissions figure would have gone down even further.

See Paul Hockenos's blog Going Renewable on the website of the German Council on Foreign Relations

Lead image: Coal stack via Shutterstock

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

11 Comments

Register To Comment
Michael Launer
Michael Launer
September 22, 2012
a-b-24958 and fsc are absolutely correct. Please see this recent blog post:

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2012/09/the-future-of-nuclear-power-the-zero-option-is-no-option-at-all
F SC
F SC
September 14, 2012
- Today Japan announced that it would shut its nukes by 2030. This is bad news for the planet and for Japanese ratepayers, as a great deal of that power will be replaced with coal.
-
- This is good news for the coal and petroleum industry. They will have another 40 billion dollars per year to buy political influence and attack renewables.
-
- "The government estimated last week it will need to spend about 3.1 trillion yen ($40.03 billion) more on fuel imports a year if it abandons nuclear power immediately."
-
- I am saddened by this news. The decision is irrational. Coal plants are worse and should be shut down first and nuclear plants last!
-
- http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international-business/japan-to-exit-nuclear-power-by-2030s-under-new-policy/articleshow/16392759.cms
-
- http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/news/world/japan-will-try-to-halt-nuclear-power-by-the-end-of-the-2030s-653350/
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
September 14, 2012
@a-b-24958: Thanks for the insight. The Russians have a history of natural gas extortion, so I can see Germany's reluctance to use it. Ironic that lignite coal is subsidized at the same time it is penalized with carbon credits. So much of government policy in any country is at cross-purposes with itself and amounts to wealth transfer to political friends at the expense of the taxpayers and the economy.
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
September 14, 2012
The nation that makes variable power sources 'inflexible' and invariable baseload power sources 'flexible' deserves its fate. I hope Germany is smarter than this.
Adam Frey
Adam Frey
September 14, 2012
I would also think that they removed nuclear as it makes for a terrible pairing with intermittent renewables. You cant fire up a nuclear plant for a couple hours like you can with coal or gas.
a b
a b
September 14, 2012
cliff,
lignite extraction in Germany is heavily subsidised as a big local employer. That makes lignite coal cheap compared to other fossil fuel alternatives that needs to be imported. Natural gas is imported from russia, far from being as cheap as in the usa, and 100% dependent of the big bear's goodwill. Norway is also sending a lot of gas to germany, but they ask hard currency for it (not USD or Euro, but norwegian krones). Germany is also now embarking on a construction spree for biogas plant and biomass plants, small scale, very decentralised, and by the hundreds per year being built. They also are starting to build mammoth offshore windturbine parks, that will generate power for 50% of the time, since the wind is more steady and stronger on the flat seas. Hopes that answers some of your pertinent questions, hopes the author of the article will write more extensively about this all.
regards,
alain from Belgium
F SC
F SC
September 13, 2012
-
- The decision to phase out nuclear was a political decision and not a rational one. It would have been wiser to phase out coal first and nuclear last. This is true from a health perspective, from an environment perspective and from an economic perspective.
-
- People are a bit unrational with their fears. Coal is far more dangerous than nuclear. We know the smoke from coal plants will sicken the planet, negatively affect the lives of our grandchildren, and is a known cancerigen. At the same time, Fukoshima gave us all a scare, but proved that even a plant that was faulty designed, criminally maintained and sited along the coast, ended up holding its radiation. And like the air travel industry, lessons are learned from every incident. Procedures and standards are revised, and today air travel is completely safe. Coal is not safe. It is poisoning us one ton at a time. Yet the poisoning is not news because it is spread out over time, and never in an event.
-
- Economically, nuclear is expensive because building the plants takes a lot of money; but they have already been built, so the costs are already incurred. Running the plants is relatively cheap since fuel costs are very low. Shutting them down will be expensive because they will need to be dismantled, and replaced with fossil fuel plants that will need to be dismantled in 40 years.
-
- It would have been wiser to phase out coal first and nuclear last.
pierre vincent
pierre vincent
September 13, 2012
loved this article thanks!!
Paul Hockenos
Paul Hockenos
September 13, 2012
cliff-claven -- i'm on it
Bernhard Scheffler
Bernhard Scheffler
September 13, 2012
Excellent well-informed balanced article. Let us have many more from this source.
Cliff Claven
Cliff Claven
September 13, 2012
Paul, very good article. Helps to paint a picture of the forces at work. When you say Germany's CO2 emissions dropped 2.2% last year, is that an absolute value, or is that with carbon credit offsets? Other sources have said Germany's emissions are rising and cancelling out the reductions of the rest of the EU. It's hard to sort the apples from the oranges in the different reports, but I am most interested in the true tons of CO2 released into the air, not the doctored and adjusted numbers. Also am curious why gas is not economical. The US has built nothing but gas powerplants for the past 15 years. Is it a scarcity of natural gas in Germany or a subsidy regime that favors everything else?

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Paul Hockenos

Paul Hockenos

Paul Hockenos is a Berlin-based author who has written about Europe since 1989. Paul is the author of three major books on European politics: Free to Hate: The Rise of the Right in Post-Communist Eastern Europe, Homeland Calling: Exile...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Create a free account and start adding your blogs.

Create an Account

Most Commented

  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Texas Legislature Passes Commercial and Industrial PACE Bill
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • 2GreenEnergy.com
  • Rich Hessler Business Development
  • RenewableEnergyWorld.com
  • Arena Solutions
  • Magnum Energy Inc.
  • Motech Industries, Inc.
  • Solaire Generation
  • Fairtrade-Messe
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information