Senate Bill 843, legislation that would have extended the benefits of renewable energy to millions of Californians, died last Friday in the state's Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce.
Proposed by State Senator Lois Wolk, Senate Bill 843 would have created 2 GW of solar energy via community facilities throughout the state of California.
Senate Bill 843 would have made it possible for utility customers within the territories of PG&E, Southern California Edison, and San Diego Gas & Electric to purchase shares of power from these community-based facilities with medium-scale renewable energy systems (up to 20 MW).
Customers would sign contracts with the facility and pay a monthly fee for their share of electricity sent into the grid. These community energy facilities then report the customer's percentage of the facility's power to the respective utility. This amount of solar electricity would then be credited towards the the customer's utility bill. This is how virtual net-metering would function with these community-based renewable energy facilities.
The renewable energy facilities' economies of scale would have given way to a cheaper cost per kWh than standard residential systems- a savings that would keep the cost of electricity down for Californians who wish to utilize renewable energy through virtual net metering.
These small to mid-sized solar power plants could have been built at existing establishments such as schools or churches, reducing the need for large-scale solar power plants in the desert, which often pose environmental concern.
These community-based renewable energy facilities also would have created an estimated 12,000 jobs without spending any state funds.
Despite all Wolk's compelling arguments to pass the bill, Senate Bill 843 died in California's Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce last Friday.
Lois Wolk, State Senator from the 5th district of California
Without the Community-Based Renewable Energy Self-Generation Program proposed by Senator Wolk, three fourths of California will just have to wait. Despite this current setback, do you believe that off-site renewable energy production through community facilities will eventually allow this demographic to access clean energy?
The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.