The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Saturday, May 25, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Follow Germany's Lead: Streamlined Permitting

Tom Jackson
August 09, 2012  |  14 Comments

Germany, a leader in renewable energy, recently set a world record when it produced 22 GW of power on May 26th, 2012.  At that point in time, half of the country's electricity was generated from solar.  Germany's current capacity for solar energy reaches about 28 GW and the country aims to reach 66GW by 2030.

By the end of 2011, Germany had about 21.6 times more solar power system installations per capita than the United States. 

Why is it that Germany, which has a much lower level of solar radiation than the United States, proportionally dwarfs the U.S. when it comes to solar installations?

 

solar irradiance map 

 What is Germany Doing Differently?

In addition to creating rewarding financial incentives for residential solar, such as their well-known Feed-in Tariff, the streamlined permitting process in Germany has given way to widespread adoption of solar energy. 

Germany has successfully scaled basic design and installation processes, driving down the cost and wait-time associated with residential solar.  Moreover, the country has actually eliminated permitting for standard residential solar, which is part of the reason residential solar is so prominent in the country.

Standardizing permitting and installation procedures to streamline these processes has helped make Germany a world leader in solar energy.  In Germany, it's not uncommon for a person to contact a solar company and have a system on their roof in less than a week- sometimes in a few days. 

 

Germany solar industry leader 

 

Meanwhile, in the United States, customers frequently find themselves forking over hundreds, if not thousands of dollars in fees, undergoing a series of unnecessary inspections, and waiting weeks to have standard photovoltaic systems installed on their homes.

The United States needs to follow Germany's lead by streamlining the permitting process for standard residential solar applications.  This would make residential solar considerably easier, cheaper, and more convenient for consumers in the United States. 

Permitting in the United States:

Though the price of solar products is decreasing and solar adoption is steadily increasing in the United States, the costly, inefficient permitting processes are a burden to the buyer and impede progress of the solar industry at large.

Before installing a residential solar system, a permit must be obtained from the local Authority Having Jurisdiction, also known as an AHJ.  Typically, permit applications for standard residential solar installations must be submitted to the AHJ in person.  SunRun recommends a standard online application for solar permitting, which would drastically simplify the process.  It would be much more efficient if all AHJs utilized a standard web-based application to streamline this process.

The permitting process varies too much across geographical location.  This inconsistency between AHJs breeds a series of avoidable obstacles that are holding back solar adoption in the United States.

With so many permitting authorities sprinkled across the country, the discrepancy between standards produces hoops to jump through.  It seems that every city or Authority Having Jurisdiction has a different interpretation of codes and standards.  Some even craft their own legislation.

Applications often undergo a succession of reviews by multiple departments, which commonly conduct their own inspections.  Permit applications are then subjected to various municipal inspections that are neither necessary nor efficient.  In an admirable attempt to guarantee safety, local municipalities frequently include extensive fire inspections and components to the system (i.e. disconnects) that are not needed, further complicating the process.

Unnecessary inspections in conjunction with other soft costs associated with residential solar create a barrier to adoption for potential customers.  Some municipalities are able to process a permit for less than $300, while others call for thousands.   Part of the problem is that all these AHJs have different fees that are often based on their own set of criteria, including those unnecessary inspections.

More often than not, the sum of these fees is too high because they are not in line with the actual processing cost to the Authority Having Jurisdiction.  SunRun reports that customers incur an average cost of $2,516 for permitting and inspection of a residential solar system. [i]  Most of these soft costs are not necessary for standard residential solar systems.

While an applicant for a residential system in Germany may only wait four days to have a system installed, this process takes weeks in the United States.  Sometimes months.

This inconsistency between jurisdictions creates difficulties for buyers, installers, and AHJs.  

Installers have more important things to do than deal with municipalities that aren't knowledgeable about photovoltaic installations.  Cities have enough on their plates to try to come up with their own filing systems, codes, and protocol. Customers need a convenient, cost-effective system of permitting that will get the solar system on their roof as soon as possible.  

The entire solar industry suffers due to the lack of structural coherence in the permitting processes in the United States.  With a standardized system in the United States, AHJs will operate more efficiently, saving everyone valuable time and resources.

What the United States needs to do:

Systemic changes need to be made to encourage the adoption of renewable energy.  These systemic changes can and must come from the Department of Energy.  The Department of Energy has already established a plan to streamline permitting through the Solar America Board for Codes and Standards, also known as the Solar ABCs.   

 

Department of Energy 

According to the New York Times, the Solar ABCs "links policy makers, solar panel manufacturers, installers and consumers to create a central clearinghouse for information on solar building codes and best practices."

Standard residential solar systems are the same whether you're in California or Montana, so why doesn't the Department of Energy incentivize municipalities to adopt standardized codes and protocol set forth by the Solar ABCs?  Eliminating the added inspections by local AHJs and streamlining the whole process will make solar adoption more workable for everyone.

If the permitting protocol was homogeneous across the country, reducing the soft costs and wait time for standard residential systems, solar energy would be able to reach an extensively broader demographic.  This can only be possible with a cooperative effort on the part of policy makers and industry leaders, changing this dynamic from a conflict to a united course of action.

The BIG Picture:

Grid parity is the point at which the levelized cost of solar electricity is less than or equal to the cost of grid electricity.

The structural inefficiency of solar permitting raises the overall cost of solar installation for consumers, pushing grid parity further into the future.

Grid parity should be a priority for our society, yet the structural barriers encountered in the permitting processes across the nation do not reflect that grid parity is of much concern.  Just as the wait time for the individual's installation is dragged out, the timeframe between now and grid parity is extended. 

By implementing an expedited permitting process nationwide, we can tear down many of the existing barriers to solar adoption in the United States.   

What steps can we take to realize this goal?

For more articles on solar and renewable energy by Tom Jackson, click here 

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

14 Comments

Register To Comment
Robert Thibodeau
Robert Thibodeau
August 17, 2012
Part of the issue I have seen in selling solar system components through my web store (www.homesolarpanels.org) is that people who are genuinely trying to get a system installed run into the locality's building and permitting maze. They are not willing to work with the utilities to create a gateway by which the average homeowner can be the general contractor for this type of project. The power company knows which types of systems are grid ready but make the application process a beaureaucratic nightmare. The locatities pass the buck to the power companies and create another issue when zoning needs to approve the systems. Since the solar panels do not look like a roof, they often balk. I have many people who get pricing, try to permit a system and then give up because they cannot fight with the government on the regulatory side. They want a system, need to do most of the installation to keep costs affordable but cannot get over the regulatory hurdle and give up. Is it any wonder that solar energy cannot be adopted quickly?
Louis Shaffer
Louis Shaffer
August 13, 2012
I am very glad to see this article, although I think there are too many trees and the forest was lost. Germamy was very smart to mandate that utilities MUST take renewable power onto the grid no matter what the source. They then defined carefully (and maintain) the electrical (and safety and such) standards. The FIT is managed to ensure a decent, but not outrageous profit.

The US, but also Europe need to focus on this area. The biggest cost gain by far for solar is in simplifying the products and legal requirements for as wide a range of regions (states) as possible.

This should be EASIER in the USA than in Europe (where very country has unique requirements).
F SC
F SC
August 11, 2012
What we should really be copping is the FIT system.

If a group of persons is given a choice between two 5kw systems: one will cost $30,000, and the government picks up the tab for $12,000. The other is a more technologically advanced system, that costs $45,000, and the government will pitch in $18,000. A percentage of people will believe that they are getting a better deal on the second system because they are getting more of their tax-dollars back. It is just human nature. We LOVE to feel that we are getting a freebie, especially from the government. On the other hand if you tell the same group that they can spend $30,000 for a system that will produce $4,000 a year, or $45,000 for a system that will produce the same, most people will chose to go low cost. This will accelerate cost cutting both in hard and soft costs, and reach grid parity faster. This is why we should also copy from Germany the Feed Inn Tariff system and get rid of all incentives involving percentage of cost. Pay for performance.

Germany has proved that FITs work better. I am certain that the lower cost of permitting was a RESULT of FITs. When voters were paying for studies out of their own pockets, and delays were putting them into lower FIT tariffs, then politicos got real pressure. Instead, we have a system that pays for unproven systems, and allows politicians to act like they are giving us a hand out.

No wonder we are way behind Germany in solar.
F SC
F SC
August 11, 2012
I am old enough to remember when my father bought the first computer on our block. A couple of certified computer guys came to our house to install it. They tested the voltage and even ordered some rewiring of the electric system, even though it worked fine for everything else. The computer just had to have its own breaker. It came in two pieces. The CPU, the monitor and the eight inch floppy drive were in one unit, and the keyboard was another. After about three days they came back and hooked up the keyboard to the CPU and the CPU to the wall.
If the government was giving incentives for new computers today, I am certain that that would still be the norm. The government would need to know that the incentive money is not going to be messed up by a non-compliant installation made by some non-certified dork like you or me.
We do not do computers that way anymore; but we do solar that way. It is expensive. It is wasteful. It is downright ridiculous.
Carter Lavin
Carter Lavin
August 11, 2012
Tom,

To answer your question "what steps can we take to realize this goal?" I recommend checking out the Vote Solar Initiative's "Project Permit" guidelines. http://votesolar.org/city-initiatives/project-permit/

It is a program designed to capture all this information about permitting across different jurisdictions in the US, grade them, and help local solar companies and citizen promote best practices in their area. It is definitely worth checking out if you care about promoting solar in the US
ANONYMOUS
August 11, 2012
White Paper
NREL/TP-7A30-51814
July 2011


Comparing Germany's and California's Interconnection Processes for PV Systems
A. Tweedie and E. Doris

http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/51814.pdf
Dennis Houghton
Dennis Houghton
August 11, 2012
Perhaps the "german system" could be expressed and explained in such a way that even stupid people can understand it. I assume that the installation process must be the same in Schweinfurt as it is in Kiel. It must bypass local officials and deal directly with whoever pays the FIT, utility or government. No permit fees. No inspections or maybe just not stupid inspectors. Help me out here with some details. The most important part of the "german system" that I know are very high consumer prices and only slightly unreliable system performance, atypically German. Adopt those two features in the USA and PV systems will pop up like flowers.
harry levin
harry levin
August 11, 2012
The german system should be copied in the US. Its time to move forward and the stupid people in the US are part of the problem. We cannot let every stupid person lead us down a dark tunnel any longer.
Soon the world will realize that the US is the largest polluter and is destroying the entire world, then perhaps something will change when the whole world gangs up on the US and forces change.
Dennis Houghton
Dennis Houghton
August 11, 2012
Tom,
This is an important and complex issue, I did not want to discourage you from studying or writing about it in any way. I have visited the Solar ABCs website and as an electrical inspector, electrician and contractor I agree with the approach for systems <15KW.
My daughter lives in Germany and tells me that due to government rules, it is much easier to buy a PV system than a used car. Plus they have a national FIT which helps stimulate demand a bit.
That said, you should focus on the US. The German model will not be implemented in the US, whether it should be is a different and moot issue.

The National Electrical Code (NEC) is revised every three years. If you track the Solar PV Article #690 for the past 12 years you would see a rapid standardization of practices and requirements that also almost keeps up with the dynamic changes in manufactured products. You would see deep involvement with design certification and harmonization with the IEC directives used by Europe an others.
The NEC is published by the NFPA National Fire Protection Association and is revised by committees of industry stakeholders including consumers. The front pages of each code book contains their names and affiliation. The NEC is accepted across the country as an electrical safety standard. Although the phrase Authority Having Juristiction has implicit meaning, an AHJ exists only as a legal entity under the NEC which created and defined the term.
In my home state the Solar PV permit includes a one page block diagram/worksheet, adapted from a UL document, containing space for equipment and wire sizes to be written in by the installer. Engineered drawings are not required for most residential installations except roof structure analysis. Some critical aspects of any solar PV installation will be unique and not possible to standardize.
Tom Jackson
Tom Jackson
August 10, 2012
Thanks for your input. Hopefully they'll get back to me with clarification. In the meantime, I'm going to remove that short paragraph, especially because I only touched on this issue briefly.

Quality control is important and having UL conduct quality inspections promotes product safety, which is good in itself.
I appreciate the feedback. Have a great day.
Dennis Houghton
Dennis Houghton
August 10, 2012
From the UL.com website FAQs

(?)A UL Listed product overheated and showed charring on the enclosure. Can UL help address the situation?
Yes, UL is committed to protecting the integrity of the UL Mark and, by extension, protecting the individuals and communities that rely on UL. You can help correct potential problems with UL certified products by filing a product incident report, which will start a formal investigation into the problem. The product incident report program covers problems related to:

Products alleged to have malfunctioned during use,
Products on which UL Marks are allegedly misused,
Products that cannot be installed in accordance with the appropriate model installation code,
Products that do not appear to comply with the requirements used to investigate and certify them,
Products that display a counterfeit UL Mark,
Product markings, packaging, literature and web site content that imply an inaccurate or inappropriate association between the product and a UL certification.

Also a document reference link: http://www.ul.com/global/documents/offerings/perspectives/regulators/electrical/newsletters/AlternativeEnergy_AG.pdf

It should be noted that in Europe a manufacturing executive can have criminal liability for product quality defects. American executives are generally immune from criminal prosecution and let the lawyers and insurance companies fight it out for financial settlements. Potential jail time is a good motivator for effective quality control oversight.
Tom Jackson
Tom Jackson
August 10, 2012
Dennis- Thanks for bringing this to my attention. UL is a third-party testing laboratory used by many AHJs as a means to determine product safety. UL does quality inspections before adding their UL label. However, I'm currently trying to get in touch with UL to clarify this information for us. I'll follow up as soon as I have their response.

Paul- Please see this report by SunRun:
"By comparison, other countries have much simpler, less expensive processes that do not sacrifice safety. Germany, France, and Japan have eliminated permitting for basic residential installations.3 Not surprisingly, Germany has the lowest installed cost in the world, 40% lower than the U.S., even though total incentives are expected to be lower in Germany in 2011.4"

http://www4.eere.energy.gov/solar/sunshot/resource_center/sites/default/files/59b89d0ed01.pdf
Paul Dennis
Paul Dennis
August 10, 2012
It's a shame the author has not provided us with details of the "permit" scheme which operates in Germany. Some facts to back up the assertions would make sense. Also I can't imagine that permits had been abandoned completely in Germany more likely the quality of work is managed through a form of self certification for the electricians who are installing panels. As someone who is heavily involved in the UK renewable certification scheme ( I provide software )I am reasonably sure the Germans will have something similar in place to ensure work is a reasonable standard and the panels generate the electricity they're supposed to.

The fact that the USA does not have a nationwide standards scheme is appalling and massively inefficient but then tjhat is nothing new. The Australian scheme is quite interesting it seems less onerous and there is some form of free-market involved.
Dennis Houghton
Dennis Houghton
August 9, 2012
The author writes:
"UL does their own quality inspections and functions like an insurance company. UL assumes legal responsibility for damages incurred by UL listed products. These additional inspections on UL listed products are a waste of time."
This is not a true statement. Liability stays with the manufacturer and installer.
Thousands of UL Listed products are further subject to "Suitable for Use" NEC rules which are enforced by the AHJ through inspections. Rooftops are hot and wet locations both requiring special selection of UL Listed materials. It is no great challenge to perform PV system electrical design if you know what you are doing. If the permit application and first inspection demonstrate that you do not really know what you are doing, you will be reinspected until you get it right or give up. Read the instructions.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Tom Jackson

Tom Jackson

Hi folks. My name is Tom and I work for a company called GoGreenSolar.com, a leading online retailer for solar products, LED lights, etc. I blog about solar, green living, politics, and anything that strikes my fancy.
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Create a free account and start adding your blogs.

Create an Account

Most Commented

  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Texas Legislature Passes Commercial and Industrial PACE Bill
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Northern Lights Solar Solutions
  • Rotork plc
  • Renewable Energy World Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Asia
  • W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
  • EnergyDreams LLC
  • Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc.
  • Helios Solar Works
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information