The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Friday, May 24, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Wind Turbines Waste Much Less Energy than Fossil Fuels

Zoë Casey
July 12, 2012  |  6 Comments

Wind energy opponents who say that producing electricity using the power of the wind is not efficient would do well to take a look at a new graphic published on the Guardian’s data blog using UK Government data. ‘Up in smoke: how energy efficient is electricity produced in the UK?’ shows that thermal sources of electricity – gas, coal, nuclear, waste/biomass, oil and other – lose massive amounts of energy as waste heat, compared to almost 0% for renewables.

Gas accounts for 48% of the UK’s electricity supply and, of the 372 Terra-Watt hours of electricity it produces per year, 54% of this is lost as heat. Coal, meanwhile, accounts for 28% producing 297 TWh, loses an even higher proportion – 66%. Nuclear – accounting for 16% of the energy supply with 162 TWh, loses 65% and oil – 3% of the supply with 51 TWh – loses 77%.

Contrast these figures with renewable energy – which all together account for 4% of the UK’s electricity supply producing 14 TWh – they lose less than one percent. So, under this measure, renewable energy is 100% efficient.

Wind energy opponents centre their arguments on the ‘capacity factor’ of a wind farm. The capacity factor of any power plant is a measure of the amount of energy it actually generates compared to its theoretical maximum output in a given time. No power plant operates at 100% of its capacity.

Wind farms do not operate at wind speeds of less than 4 metres per second, and they are shut down to prevent damage during gale force winds of 25 metres/second or more, or for maintenance. But conventional power stations also do not operate all the time – they stop generating electricity during maintenance or breakdowns.

Comparing the outputs of both sources does show that conventional power stations produce power at a level compared to their theoretical maximum that is currently higher than the level for wind energy. Wind power’s capacity factor is around 30% onshore and 40% offshore, increasing year on year as more wind turbines come online and technology improves. Meanwhile, data from the German Association of Energy and Water Industries (Bundesverband der Energie und Wasserwirtschaft) shows that fossil fuels are often below 50%, even in winter.

RenewableUK, the national industry body, says that the UK has one of the best wind regimes in the world and wind turbines have considerably higher capacity factors than many of the European countries where wind already makes a significant contribution to electricity supplies. Denmark, for example, has a wind farm capacity factor of 24% and yet wind power ‘fuels’ over a quarter of its electricity supply.

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

6 Comments

Register To Comment
ANONYMOUS
July 15, 2012
anonymous-

Modern coal and gas power plants are much better than 32% thermally efficient. In fact, large combined cycle NG turbine generators can achieve thermal efficiencies over 60%. As you note, most of coal & NG usage goes to electrical power production. Most oil usage goes to transportation.

While many posters love to use the statistic of a high US per-capita global energy consumption rate to push for more renewables in the US, this simple statistic also ignores a couple very important facts about global energy usage. First, the US economy is the most efficient user of energy. While it consumes about 20% of global energy production, it also produces almost 24% of global economic output. Second, the US has the world's tightest emissions regulation. Which means any coal/oil/gas burned in the US will produce less emission than if burned anywhere else.

Commercial wind is definitely the most economically viable renewable source. But it will still take a long time before it replaces a significant amount of fossil fuel use, in the US or elsewhere in the world.
Bman Bman
Bman Bman
July 15, 2012
Wind power is seriously bonza beaut, but this such comparisons of efficiency are merely amusing, not persuasive.

Heat, per se, is not alarming. The more compelling case is that wind turbines require far less water.
ANONYMOUS
July 15, 2012
I am a big proponent of advancing fossil fuel technology towards non-polluting energy, but feel it should succeed based on its own market economics, rather than through government subsidies and mandates. In daily reading about wind energy, there are vast numbers of wind energy opponents who detest the idea of wind energy for reasons such as aesthetics, bird strikes, industrialization of land they want protected, religious support for dirty energy, and myriad other reasons. I also know lots of people who just love governments forcing the populace to support fossil fuel energy.

Salient facts about fossil fuel energy come from the composite of USA energy demand compiled annually by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. About 83.1 percent of energy currently used in the USA comes from petroleum, coal, and natural gas. (8.6 percent comes from nuclear power; 8.2 percent comes from biomass, geothermal, hydro, solar, and wind.)

About 57 percent of total USA fossil-fuel energy use is "rejected" or wasted, mainly as heat lost to the atmosphere. The remainder goes to "energy services," meaning that energy (43 percent) is actually used to run our machinery, heat our homes, etc., etc. Coal-fired power plants operate at about 32 percent efficiency, meaning that 68 percent of the energy derived from burning coal is lost as heat at the power plant and never goes into actual energy services.

Any debate over the energy efficiency of fossil fuels versus other energies needs to be honest about the energy needed to mine the fuels, transport the fuels to the locations where they are used, pump the water needed for generating energy, and allow for the prodigious waste included in burning the fuels, whether at a power plant or in an internal combustion engine. The debate also needs to be honest about the government mandates, regulations, and taxpayer subsidies for a fossil fuel industry so hugely profitable that it needs no such incentives to be successful.
ANONYMOUS
July 13, 2012
I'm a big proponent of advancing wind energy technology, but I also feel it should succeed based on its own market economics, rather than through government subsidies and mandates. I would also disagree with the author's use of the term "wind energy opponents". I do not personally know of a single person that is opposed to wind energy itself. However, I do know lots of people that are opposed to governments forcing them to financially support wind energy thru mandates, regulations and taxpayer subsidies.

The argument over how "efficient" oil/gas use is vs renewables like solar or wind is subject to lots of interpretation. There is no firm, objective definition of what "efficient" means. On a simple cost/Btu basis, nothing can currently compete with coal/oil/gas. For most transportation uses, nothing can compete with oil. If one chooses to ignore costs, residential PV solar has huge practical advantages, since it takes advantage of existing infrastructure. If one wants the lowest cost renewable, commercial wind is currently the way to go.

Any debate over the energy efficiency of wind/solar vs coal/oil/gas needs to be honest about the energy needed to manufacture wind turbines or solar panels. The amount of energy needed for manufacturing PV solar panels is actually quite large. This is the same as the "well-to-wheel" debate with IC engine autos vs EV's.

The best way to improve the "efficiency" of commercial wind is to figure out better local uses for intermittent wind energy, instead of just dumping it into the grid.
ANONYMOUS
July 13, 2012
In addition to the consideration for capacity factor between conventional power plant and wind powers, which one of these would cost more to build up ?
Ken Higgs
Ken Higgs
July 13, 2012
Great article. Perhaps soon....? wind can supply the energy to build more wind machines, not 'the others' doing so. We'll still need petro: to make the resins for components. Yet, algae-bios might also be soon ...doing that?

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Zoë Casey

Zoë Casey

The European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) is the voice of the wind industry, actively promoting the utilisation of wind power in Europe and around the world.
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Create a free account and start adding your blogs.

Create an Account

Most Commented

  • 12
    No Easy Fix for Broken Wind Turbine at US High School
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Wind Turbine Lubrication and Maintenance: Protecting Investments in Renewable Energy
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Schneider Electric
  • Green Power Conferences
  • Met Office
  • Admirals Bank
  • Active Communications International
  • Greenpower Capital
  • AEG Power Solutions
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information