The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Thursday, May 23, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Just Energy Independence or Clean Energy Self-Reliance?

John Farrell
July 10, 2012  |  15 Comments

In Thomas Friedman’s latest column, he praises Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts because he “took one for the country.”  Friedman sees that “America today is poised for a great renewal” if only it can get some “big, centrist, statesmanlike leadership.”

Logically, there would be some renewable (energy) in America’s renewal, right?

Wrong.  Here’s Friedman’s vision for America:

Our newfound natural gas bounty can give us long-term access to cheap, cleaner energy and, combined with advances in robotics and software, is already bringing blue-collar manufacturing back to America. Web-enabled cellphones and tablets are creating vast new possibilities to bring high-quality, low-cost education to every community college and public school so people can afford to acquire the skills to learn 21st-century jobs. Cloud computing is giving anyone with a creative spark cheap, powerful tools to start a company with very little money. And dramatically low interest rates mean we can borrow to build new infrastructure — and make money.  [emphasis mine]

I’m generally a fan of Thomas Friedman.  He’s got an everyman way of writing about big issues, with a passion for practicality, especially when it comes to rebuilding America.  But for a man who regularly talks of the opportunity of 21st technology, this is a very 20th Century vision.

Here’s an alternative:

The stodgy National Renewable Energy Laboratory says that renewable energy like wind and solar can meet at least 80% of our electricity needs by 2050.  (note: most forecasts of renewable energy generation by “reputable sources” lowball it, by a lot).  This isn’t just long-term energy, it’s infinite.  There are no refills on natural gas.

Two thirds of American states have the local resources to meet their entire electricity needs with renewable energy like wind, water, and solar.  Within a decade, 100 million Americans in the largest metropolitan areas will be able to get cheaper electricity from solar on their rooftop than from their utility. 
 
And what about the economy?  Solar and wind create several times the jobs per megawatt of electricity capacity (data below from Putting Renewables to Work published by UC Berkeley).  Local ownership of distributed renewable energy resources can double and triple, respectively, the jobs and economic impact of our energy generation.

Big, centrist, statesmanlike leadership isn’t found in last century’s energy sources.  We aren’t going to frack our way to a cleaner, brighter future.  We need a bold, 21st century vision for energy.

If President Obama wants to lead on energy, he should declare independence from a fossil fuel past and give Americans a vision for clean energy self-reliance. 

This post originally appeared on ILSR’s Energy Self-Reliant States blog.

Lead image: House with solar via Shutterstock

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

15 Comments

Register To Comment
Jim JAMES
Jim JAMES
July 15, 2012
The best coal is the one that stays in the ground.
Yes "a-b-24958", this would be the best form of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). It was done millions of years ago.
John DAngelo
John DAngelo
July 13, 2012
FJS,

I agree with you 100%. However, I will take advantage of ANY and ALL government programs that benefit ME directly when it comes to renewables. For example I have received over $30,000 in direct checks from government and utility programs that helped me defray the cost of my solar hot water system and my PV system. I did not pass them and have virtually no control over who does.

I believe that the INDIVIDUAL has to take control over his their energy needs. Most of us have free energy delivered to our site day in and day out yet 99% of us do not harvest that energy. Sad but true. But those who DO are well ahead of the game of life, both financially and psychologically.

I cannot imagine how many research projects from NREL and other agencies are never bought to market because of politics etc. But at the end of the day we really do not need many if any "major" breakthroughs. My PV array is guaranteed for 25 years power production, my solar hot water system for 10 years, my EV has a 100,00 or 8 year warranty on the battery pack. Companies do not give those type of warranties unless they are fairly confident in their products. Both PV and ST products have a fantastic track record and both will and should last a lifetime once bought. So buy early and enjoy for a lifetime!

I think people are fooling themselves to wait for some "silver bullet" when the technology TODAY can provide all our basic energy NEEDS (entertainment,lighting, etc.) ON SITE for most Americans. Also your transportation needs as well! We really do not need government to make our choices, but if we do not make them individually they will start making them for us.
Frederick Scheffler
Frederick Scheffler
July 13, 2012
The single greatest obstacle to clean energy and energy independence are those that believe GOVERNMENT is the answer.A myriad of solutions have been ignored that are innovative and game changing have been ignored in favor of those proposed by "favored" sources. Anyone that believes the NREL 'is impartial and supportive of new solutions that come from 'unfavored' sources...then I have this Bridge in Brooklyn I would like to discuss.Over the last 20 years ....time after time...I have seen first hand....solutions that were cheaper and had great promise IGNORED by agencies or overloaded with bureaucratic waste to the point that they were abandoned. Many of those posting on this blog are complicit in the failure to effect a truly viable energy program by insuring that that those that support the bureaucracies are returned to office.Real solutions were developed in this country in far greater numbers before the intrusion of GOVERNMENT agencies staffed by those who have never had to actually perform and ACHIEVE in the private sector.
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
July 12, 2012
john-dangelo - beware the Banderlog my son.
"The US congress encourages conversion of vehicles to CNG offering tax credits of up to 50% of the cost of auto conversion and installation of a CNG home filling station." Check out www.cngunited.com. It can happen - grudgingly admit they have a point.

EV's are easily dissed - 'they use electricity that is produced by burning coal' and 'you'll need to rewire your house' (gasp). When it comes to EVs, two words my friend: 'range anxiety' - somewhere in the secret meetings of the PR Mafia, awards are being handed out for this one.

I have to confess to using NG for home heating and hot water. The alternatives are not good and my dumbass power authority relies on non-renewable sources for 75% of what it sells. My get-back is to minimize my energy foot-print by making purchase decisions focused on energy efficiency, by systematically retiring low efficiency items over time. They don't make it easy ... fixed charges on the utility bills make energy progressively more expensive per unit as consumption goes down. Just like bars that want you to drink as much as possible before you 'drive home safely', energy companies want you to consume as much as possible.
John DAngelo
John DAngelo
July 12, 2012
gerald r,

Right on about natural gas. 99% of people who use natural gas think its the best thing since sliced bread. I use to think the same until I moved onto a 5 acre parcel and there is all sorts of natural gas activity going on around me. Trucks, dust, noise, light intusion, diesel fumes to just name a few. Solar energy is and always will be one of the cleanest forms of energy both in the production and the harvesting. At least making a solar modules is done INSIDE and not outside where ones environment of piece and tranquility can be shattered in an instant.

As usual no one looks at the "extermailities" right?

But no worries, NG will never become mainstream transportation fuel. To complicated, conversion is to much and there is NO NG infrastructure. The EV infrastructure is already in place. It is called a 120/240V outlet and there must be billions of those in America alone. And if that is not enough we went form 500 to 5000 EV charging stations in about years time with no signs of slowing down. Much easier and less expensive to put in an electrical outlet than a NG station!!
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
July 12, 2012
Here's a recent story that will force NG promoters to up the greenwash:
"The written ruling, issued in a letter Monday by Texas District Court Judge Gisela Triana, shot down arguments by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality that only water is a "public trust," a doctrine that dates to the Roman Empire stating a government must protect certain resources — usually water, sometimes wildlife — for the common good."

Actually, the Romans started small - you couldn't pee into your neighbor's fountain. But they did get air quality laws (you couldn't stink up your neighbor's air)and even forced smelly industries to locate in areas with special industrial zoning. A few thousand years later, we need a court ruling to affirm the right to breath clean air! We should all be wearing 'I'm with stupid' T-shirts.
Gerry Wootton
Gerry Wootton
July 12, 2012
Thank you anonymous -- I trust your soap box is made entirely of natural materials made from renewable resources.
1-b-24958: if Johnny jumps of a bridge are you going to jump of the bridge too? More like, you'd jump first in order to keep Johnny from doing it.
The twin peaks of NG mythos are that it's cheap and that it's clean neither of which is the case. It seems lately that energy independence has been conflated with other energy issues. Current hot topic is how large a subsidy to give NG at the pumps (for once politicians saw sense or, as Republicans see it, Obama made another booboo). As it stands, NG gets >$1.6B in subsidies each year which can certainly grow much larger if the industry can get politicians to sell out on this particular path to energy independence. Apparently, externalities don't seem to matter in this debate - it's a bit like high altitude bombing where you don't get emotionally involved with the victims. Fossil fuel fanboys are rarely around to watch the victims puking their lungs out. I'd love to see a mash up of a Romney cheap coal rant and Jethro Tull's Aqualung.
Atanacio Luna
Atanacio Luna
July 12, 2012
AB24958 is right and the point is missed in the article. The other thing that is alwasy missed in any discussion is that the more jobs created the more expensive and thus the more energy ineffecient that is the given technology under consideration. Jobs means hamburgers and pants and cars etc; that all mean energy. The right solution has to make the environment better, not just less bad. There is such a thing, and the market will bring it. There has to be such a thing. A water-use as great as the fossil fuel-use bubble is in its last stages, we either find such a thing or don't have kids: they will suffer more than it is worth. Pluvinergy is such a solution: to be published in November. I have a kid comming in Dec.
a b
a b
July 12, 2012
" We all should appreciate the huge environmental benefits the rapid shift from coal to NG has produced in the US. This is a great step in the right direction on the long road until wind and solar power become economically competitive. "

Duh, That exported US coal being burned in china, is flowing back to seattle and california, due to high altitude jet streams. In fact, that is worse than burning it in the USA itself, since then the coal pollution is flowing to Europe.... The best coal is the one that stays in the ground. I achieved that by becoming a customer of a utility supplying only 100% renewable sourced electricity, and afterwards putting PV panels on my home (payback 7 years, garanteed operation 20 years, I am already achieving electrical grid parity in belgium with my PV panels, since my country imports 100% of our energy).
ANONYMOUS
July 12, 2012
Unfortunately Obama's direction is not for clean energy independence but rather MORE control. He wants to be a dictator, and nothing less and his actions and policies prove it. Clean and green is just a means to cover his real intentions. If he was so concerned about the environment he would have CHANGED his own way of 'living'. Instead he has left more carbon footprints than AL 'green' Gore. There is an old saying;"Show me your friends and I'll show you your future." All anyone has to do is look at Obama's Marxist, Communist, fer-rends to see his REAL intentions. Obama concerned about the environment??? Yeah...I have some swamp land here in the desert to sell you!
John DAngelo
John DAngelo
July 12, 2012
Obama DOES have a vision concerning renewable energy. But the opposite party is fighting his vision tooth and nail and looking for ANY excuse (Sayndria failure) to put his RE ideas down. Why? because the opposite party is the 'status quo ' party and if Romney gets elected (which is highly possible being able to raise quite a lot more more that Obama and money 'talks') we slide backwards ' once again.more natural gas, more oil, drill baby drill, etc. My slogan is simple: FORWARD (as Obamas slogan is, but I add, NOT BACKWARDS. Obama needs to throw that chart in this article in the opponents face because if jobs is what the elections is all about the fossil fuel industry is not going to cut the mustard, but they will tell the American people oil prices will fall because we can drill our way out of this mess and se $2.00 at the gas pump once again and of course create MILLIONS of jobs in the pursuit on less expensive ga. Dream on! Yet many Americans actually believe such obvious nonsense. We are drilling at an all time high, getting more oil out of Iraq and Libya and the price of oil keeps rises IN THE LONG RUN. WHen are Americans going to 'get it'? The future of transportation is NOT oil or natural gas or even ethanol but ELECTRONS! I cannot begin to tell you how great it feels to bypass gas stations, fill up my 100% EV with FREE solar energy! Oh what a feeling! FORWARD, NOT BACKWARD!
ANONYMOUS
July 11, 2012
Tom Friedman's sudden affection for Chief Justice Roberts has nothing to do with clean energy or US economic prosperity. It only has to do with Robert's position on increasing government control of the US healthcare system.

Friedman's comments about "a newfound energy bounty" provided by cheap, abundant natural gas supplies is only partially correct. The rapid transition from coal to NG in the US energy market is good in terms of cost, emissions, GDP, tax revenues, and domestic security. But Friedman also fails to mention the biggest benefit. The massive annual US production of coal can now be exported to countries like China. Where it will greatly offset current trade imbalances and will bring in huge amounts of foreign capital to state economies like West Virginia, Kentucky, Pennsylvania and Ohio.

We all should appreciate the huge environmental benefits the rapid shift from coal to NG has produced in the US. This is a great step in the right direction on the long road until wind and solar power become economically competitive.
Dennis Houghton
Dennis Houghton
July 10, 2012
I am a solar PV advocate but I question the idea that we can achieve so-called grid parity or the $2/Watt installed goal and still have the largest number of jobs created per MW installed. Labor is a large cost, the idea seems counter-intuitive unless you added the externalized cost of other systems. Unless the jobs are very low-paying then the math might work. Commodity PV + commodity labor. Think swimming pools and hot tubs. good luck RE industry
Dennis Houghton
Dennis Houghton
July 10, 2012
'100 years of energy independence' Fraud is a harsh word, more gentle would be an Orwellian manipulation of language to shape public opinion. But the AGA has such attractive people in their advertizing, they can't be prevaricating(aka lying), can they? The third explanation is if you can't dazzle them with brilliance just baffle them with BS. Both '100 years' and 'energy independence' are hallucinations from the public relations department. Anyone who uses those phrases in an argument is either ignorant or lying. I apologize for being impolite to the AGA experts; and Thomas Friedman
Grazida King
Grazida King
July 10, 2012
Great article! Wondering if you've seen North American Power's plan to protect America's energy future? http://bit.ly/USWIND

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
John Farrell

John Farrell

John Farrell directs the Energy Self-Reliant States and Communities program at ILSR and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits of local ownership and dispersed generation of renewable energy. His latest paper,...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Create a free account and start adding your blogs.

Create an Account

Most Commented

  • 15
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?
  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Ambient Technologies, Inc.
  • Solar Electric Power Association
  • AllEarth Renewables
  • Sol Systems LLC
  • Unirac, Inc.
  • HelioSage
  • Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc.
  • Active Communications International
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information