The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? ×

Why the Tariffs on Chinese Solar Panels are Bad for American Business

Micah Steiger
June 08, 2012  |  7 Comments

Two weeks ago, the U.S. Department of Commerce sent a clear message to the American renewable energy community: “We don’t support you.”

By levying tariffs ranging from 30-250 percent on all solar panels imported from China, the ruling will constrict the growth of renewable energy here in America; driving up the prices for installers, their customers, and, ultimately, the American taxpayer. The legislation threatens to kill the very blue-collar jobs it claims to save.

Last October, the U.S. subsidiary of the German company SolarWorld Industries filed a petition claiming that Chinese manufacturers were infiltrating the US market, “dumping” their panels at less than cost in a drive to put U.S. manufacturers out of business. Chinese government subsidies, SolarWorld claims, made it impossible to compete.

Meanwhile, U.S. manufacturer Solyndra, the beneficiary of a $535 million Department of Energy loan guarantee, continued its controversial Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing.  Perhaps this one example shows best how hypocritical this ruling is: the loan guarantee allowed Solyndra to receive loans at very low interest rates, despite it being a high risk, pre-revenue start-up.  At what rate could Solyndra have raised money from other sources?  Our calculations show that this “subsidy” was easily worth over $2 billion to Solyndra, and is just one of many similar “subsidies” provided right here within the U.S. 

The irony is that becoming the world’s leading solar manufacturer is not a role the U.S. should seek to fill. The market that SolarWorld and Solyndra were fighting for is one of razor-thin margins, increasing automation, and commoditization.  Meanwhile, companies like SolarCity, Sungevity, and Urban Green Energy are focusing on the actual implementation of solar and renewable energy technologies. In doing so, we are growing extremely fast and creating thousands of American jobs. These jobs, far outnumbering what would be created in manufacturing, cannot be outsourced. Further, our companies scale globally, bringing proven business models overseas and increasing the presence of American companies as leaders in the worldwide renewable energy industry.

If any more irony were needed, we can look to an email we received shortly after the tariff announcement from Conergy, a prominent U.S. supplier of renewable energy products. Conergy announced that in the wake of the Department of Commerce’s announcement that they would now be offering solar panels from Hyundai at “competitive pricing.”  Yes, that’s right — this tariff does nothing for U.S. manufacturers, it only moves business from China to Korea. 

For years, the world has berated China for unsustainable energy practices, and now, after investing millions to promote renewables, they are being punished directly for being too competitive.  Worst of all, in punishing Chinese companies, The Department of Commerce is punishing American companies as well.  Solar job growth in California was 166 percent from 2005 through 2010, despite the poor economy, and a recent report from LinkedIn showed that renewable energy continues to be one of the leading sources of job growth in the United States.  Meanwhile, the difficulties for solar panel manufacturers have been due to one reason: excess supply as demand hasn’t scaled up as fast as original expectations, often set by overzealous politicians.  In fact, Chinese suppliers are currently under great pressure as well — you can look at their stock prices to see how badly they are already suffering.

As a country we have a choice: Do we continue to compete as we have done so well throughout the last century, using innovation to become leaders in every industry?  Or do we turn inward and tell ourselves we can’t compete against outside forces, and put up trade barriers to protect ourselves against the outside world? Hey, it works for North Korea, right? The answer to sustainability lies not in escalating a trade war with China but in creating jobs and spurring innovation here in America.

Nick Blitterswyk, David Droz, Micah Steiger – Urban Green Energy

Nick, David and Micah work for Urban Green Energy, a renewable energy solutions company based in New York. Urban Green Energy designs distributed wind and solar energy systems for residential, commercial, and telecommunications facilities around the world.

Image: Taxes sign via Shutterstock

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

7 Comments

Register To Comment
Micah Steiger
Micah Steiger
June 13, 2012
Thank you all for your comments. This is an ever changing issue, and it is important to focus on the growth of clean power worldwide, which can be difficult in today's highly politicized media. We can all agree that cheaper panels is good for the end users- wether they be for residents, commercial facilities, or the tens of thousands of installers across the United States. The more affordable clean energy components are in comparison to fossil fuels (which carry with them a wealth of highly negative externalities), the greater the proportion of our electricity demands will be met with clean, renewable power. We believe it's fair to point out that the US has received subsidies as China has also received subsidies by the People's Republic. We believe it is also fair to question whether, on a fair footing, the USA could be on par with a low-cost manufacturing country like China for solar photovoltaics, which are increasingly commoditized.
first last
first last
June 12, 2012
China's labor population outnumbers the USA by roughly 4-1 (1.3 billion people vs 300 million). This is a simple fact. They can ramp up massive industrial scale plants in a matter of months, pushing out dubious quality products. Trying to compete toe-to-toe with a third world country on the basis of cost is moronic - yet that's what we're trying to accomplish with these pointless politically motivated tariffs. The Chinese solar pv engine is here to stay and the tariffs only delay the inevitable. This isn't rhetoric - but historical fact based on case studies of HP, Motorola, Lucent, Apple Computer, etc ad infinitum. All of our major industrial bases have moved critical manufacturing process to asia (to include China). Solar PV would naturally follow this trend as saving US manufacturing jobs is trendy and admirable, is not financially feasible. The oversupply provides an excellent opportunity for our nation to deploy private and community grids, providing opportunities for physical construction and management, however this will eventually cut into the utility companies' profits - perhaps significantly if allowed to follow its natural course. While flaming the author may be patriotic - his statements are factual and inevitable. Instead of tariffs - why not just subsidize our solar manufacturers. The USA has initiated a trade war it cannot possibly hope to win.
ANONYMOUS
June 12, 2012
Slanderous pro-China. Another author only concerned with his own profit margins guised in "protecting Americans" "...driving up the prices for installers, their customers, and, ultimately, the American taxpayer. The legislation threatens to kill the very blue-collar jobs it claims to save." "…this tariff does nothing for U.S. manufacturers, it only moves business from China to Korea." So it drives up prices (to the American taxpayer?) but yet does nothing but move manufacturing to Korea? Contradiction. And with regard to "driving up prices to the American tax payer, the companies you tout as creating American jobs and growing extremely fast. The Lease option works because of the American tax payer. By leasing a system at a "sale price of $8/W that actually only costs $5/W so these companies can take the 30% of the higher number…who is scamming the American taxpayer? Why compare Solyndra to SolarWorld and this case? Totally different technologies…totally different manufacturing. Any time I see a Solyndra used as evidence for any anti Solar rhetoric, it is clear that the author has no idea what they are talking about. Solyndra was a mistake, and if the administration had actually talked to a physicist regarding there technology, they never would have spent the $500k. SolarWorld and any other manufacturer in the US, did not take advantage of any subsidies that were not offered to every other manufacturer in the world. "Meanwhile, the difficulties for solar panel manufacturers have been due to one reason: excess supply as demand hasn't scaled up as fast as original expectations, often set by overzealous politicians." …and the Chinese plan constructed manufacturing for 5x the expected demand growth. "Do we continue to compete as we have done so well throughout the last century" Opinion…and when we were competing well, we were manufacturing. Since the fall of our Manufacturing base thus has been the decline of the American economy. FE
Douglas Prince
Douglas Prince
June 12, 2012
Good Lord, that stupid fucking Solyndra argument again. When will the conservative nutbags finally get it through their heads that Solyndra's demise was purely due to that Magical Free Market which they breathlessly extol with every sweeping oratorical rant? Solyndra had a good product (thin films in tubes) that, at the time, was cheaper than standard solar panels. But before they could get it to market, the price of materials for poly-si and mono-si panels radically dropped and pushed thin films out of the market. End of story. And all the bitching and moaning by you waterheads about the government funding unsupported technology is just so much more smoke you blow up yer keesters. What about when we plowed hundreds of millions of dollars to build a tank that could float on water? (It didn't.) Or how about when the CIA spent millions on training a microphone-implanted cat to spy on the Russian embassy in DC? (Upon its release, it immediately ran into traffic and got squashed by a truck.) How come no bitch and moan about those stupid wastes of dollars? Or are you only interested when it doesn't involve war? Dumbasses...
Robert Hilbun
Robert Hilbun
June 12, 2012
The big question to me is do we want clean energy now today or do we want a trade war? And if someone can explain to me how big tax grants are any different than Chinese subsidies to their solar companies. Here in Hawaii we have 30% federal tax and 35% state tax on the cost of material and labor on installed PV systems is it really any different than if we gave tax and other incentives to companies to make solar panels in US. Can't we just quit the squabbiling around and subsidise our own companies to build and sell panels, we are already subsidising the chinese panels again right here at home by our own governments state and federal tax rebates, plus other incentives programs that popped up and down over the years. I don't know how long you have to be on this planet to see nothing is ever really fair and all even steven, their is always an angle to the $ and power, just the way it is. So I suggest we take advantage of making clean energy as inexpensive as possible for lots of reason, biggest one the environment which benefits us all, in ways we can't even know yet.
daniel arguelles
daniel arguelles
June 12, 2012
Anonymous, The funny thing is, this only stems the flow of ugly cheap traditional panels that use racks and penetrations to your roof. A great improvement in favor of less invasive American flexible thin film technology. Dan
ANONYMOUS
June 12, 2012
The author writes: "For years, the world has berated China for unsustainable energy practices, and now, after investing millions to promote renewables, they are being punished directly for being too competitive." Technically China has invested Billions to EXPORT renewable energy products; they are attempting to establish dominance in an industry. If they do this by making better products that's fine, but selling products at a loss until their competitors go out of business isn't legal and should be opposed. The author suggests that we should sacrifice the manufacturing industry so that the installation industry can benefit from lower module prices. Who is he to decide that US manufacturers should not get the protection the trade agreements afford them? If predatory tactics such as dumping are allowed to continue unchallenged industry dominance will go to companies that can obtain the best government funding of deficit spending rather than those that produce the best products. That is ultimately a recipe for poorer products and higher prices. Steven

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Micah Steiger

Micah Steiger

Micah is a specialist in managing energy projects and business development in the United States, Latin America, and the Caribbean. Micah works for Urban Green Energy, the premier manufacturer of distributed vertical axis wind and solar...
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Create a free account and start adding your blogs.

Create an Account

Most Commented

  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 12
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?
  • 4
    China Solar Update: Trina Improves, Suntech Scores Extension, Beijing Awaits EU Tariff Decision

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Able Energy Co.
  • Eaton
  • Solmetric Corporation
  • KACO new energy, Inc.
  • Black & Veatch Corporation
  • Enerquip
  • Sol Systems LLC
  • SolarReviews
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information