The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Who Has the Most Cost-Effective Solar FiT Program?

John Farrell
June 25, 2012  |  5 Comments

Print

In a new report on U.S. CLEAN (Clean Local Energy Accessible Now) programs, I provide a comparison of solar CLEAN Contract (feed-in tariff) rates across the United States.

Comparing published rates is not particularly helpful, however, because contract lengths vary (from 15 to 25 years) and the solar resource also varies widely.  For international comparisons (e.g. Germany), it's also necessary to account for the currency exchange rate and the federal tax incentives that are routinely factored in to U.S. solar CLEAN prices.

Here's a look at the methodology for normalizing the CLEAN rates for comparison, and two maps illustrating those prices.  The maps illustrate how Germany's mature solar market means they pay much less for solar than U.S. CLEAN programs, especially when accounting for the federal taxpayer subsidy of local CLEAN programs.

First, here are the published solar CLEAN prices for all U.S. programs that support residential solar, including Germany’s program.  Contract prices are paid per kilowatt-hour (kWh) for the specified contract term.

Residential Solar CLEAN Rates (Germany and U.S.)

Location Price per kWh Contract Term
Germany 19.5 euro cents 20 years
Vermont 27.1 cents 25 years
Hawaii 27.4 cents 20 years
Gainesville 24 cents 20 years
Consumers Energy 26 cents 15 years
NIPSCO 30 cents 15 years

The first step is to convert all prices to U.S. dollars.  I use an exchange rate of 1.3 USD to euros.

Residential Solar CLEAN Rates (Germany and U.S.; USD)

Location Price per kWh
Contract Term
Germany 25.4 cents 20 years
Vermont 27.1 cents 25 years
Hawaii 27.4 cents 20 years
Gainesville 24 cents 20 years
Consumers Energy 26 cents 15 years
NIPSCO 30 cents 15 years

The next step is to normalize all contracts to 20 years.  So we adjust prices down on shorter contracts and up on longer contracts to get an equivalent 20-year price (in net present value).

Residential Solar CLEAN Rates (Germany and U.S.; USD, normalized to 20 years)

Location Price per kWh
Contract Term
Germany 25.4 cents 20 years
Vermont 31.7 cents 20 years
Hawaii 27.4 cents 20 years
Gainesville 24 cents 20 years
Consumers Energy 20.9 cents 20 years
NIPSCO 24.1 cents 20 years

Next we account for the variability in sunshine, normalizing to the solar insolation in Gainesville, FL (5.3 average annual kWh per sq. meter per day).  Jurisdictions with weak sunshine relative to Gainesville will have their prices drop (because they can pay much less per kWh) and places with better sunshine will have their prices increase.  Germany sees the greatest adjustment, because the solar resource quality there (in Munich) is just 3.28, compared to 5.3 in Gainesville.

Residential Solar CLEAN Rates (Germany and U.S.; USD, normalized to 20 years, Gainesville insolation)

Location Price per kWh
Contract Term
Germany 15.7 cents 20 years
Vermont 25.9 cents 20 years
Hawaii 28.6 cents 20 years
Gainesville 24 cents 20 years
Consumers Energy 16.9 cents 20 years
NIPSCO 21 cents 20 years

At this point, we’ve removed all of the disparities between U.S. solar CLEAN programs and can see that some programs (e.g. Hawaii) pay 40% more for solar than the lowest cost U.S. CLEAN (Consumers Energy).

Residential Solar CLEAN Rates (Germany and U.S.; USD, normalized to 20 years, Gainesville insolation)

But participants in the U.S. programs are likely, if not expected, to take advantage of the 30 percent federal tax credit for installing solar.  In Germany, on the other hand, there are no other financial incentives.  So an accurate comparison to Germany would inflate U.S. solar prices by 30 percent.  This apples-to-apples comparison shows that the Germans are paying 50 percent less for residential solar than comparable U.S. programs.

Residential Solar CLEAN Rates (Germany and U.S.; USD, normalized to 20 years, Gainesville insolation, no federal tax credit)

Location Price per kWh
Contract Term
Germany 15.7 cents 20 years
Vermont 37 cents 20 years
Hawaii 40.9 cents 20 years
Gainesville 34.3 cents 20 years
Consumers Energy 24.1 cents 20 years
NIPSCO 30 cents 20 years

The implications of this are remarkable.  Solar PV modules and arrays are sold on a world market, so hardware is unlikely to account for the price difference.  Rather, the maturity of the German market has significantly reduced the installation and balance of system costs for small-scale solar.

That’s actually a very hopeful sign for the U.S., as these jurisdictions are using CLEAN Contracts to accelerate the growth of their solar market and capture those same cost savings.  Our report provides more detail on these U.S. CLEAN programs, including some lessons learned that may help them mimic the success of Germany's solar feed-in tariff.

This post originally appeared on ILSR’s Energy Self-Reliant States blog.

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

5 Comments

Register To Comment
Allen Gerhardt
Allen Gerhardt
July 19, 2012
Here in Gainesville, I pay 11.5 cents/kwh for grid power, I am retired and cannot get much out of tax credits, since my taxes are low. Since the utility will only apply exported power as a credit, I am discouraged from installing a full size system, in addition to getting no incentive from the tax credit. The state legislator has determined that only utilities can use REC's, so we are being discouraged from using solar power , even as the utilities claim otherwise in their adds.

The cost of permits for solar are also unreasonable and far higher than the cost of electrical permit for an entire new house.

We still have a long way to go before solar power gets a fair shake in the market. Protectionism for established power production is preventing the wide spread adoption of solar power, and we have our political bribery to thank for that. http://abundantenergy.com/blog/utility-take-over-of-florida-solar-industry

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2011/08/clever-accounting-lets-utilities-cash-in-when-you-go-solar
Quentin Prideaux
Quentin Prideaux
June 26, 2012
This is great, and yes, encouraging. How about one more step - comparing the amount paid relative to the cost of local electricity to the consumer? So in Germany you only have to pay 1c per kWh over the market, but in Vermont it's 3c (numbers illustrative). For that matter you could compare relative to the cost of generation (if that figure is available, meaningful given the different costs of generation by source, time of day etc).
Osha Davidson
Osha Davidson
June 25, 2012
Thanks, John. And thanks for the map link.
John Farrell
John Farrell
June 25, 2012
@ThePhoenixSun Great questions. CLEAN programs in the U.S. are largely like Germany's, where you get the price for ALL energy production, not just for on-site consumption (this is not net metering). There were a couple exceptions (one Indiana program and the Iowa one). A comparative map would be great. I didn't include it in the report, but here it is: http://c1cleantechnicacom.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/files/2011/08/average-electricity-price-by-state.png
Osha Davidson
Osha Davidson
June 25, 2012
Great post, John. Two quick questions: 1) Under Germany's energy law, RE producers get paid for excess production whereas in the US, the best most (all?) home-owners with rooftop solar can do is zero-out their utility bill. Is that correct and, if so, how does that fit into this report? 2) The cost of conventionally produced electricity varies tremendously by location. I may have missed this in your report, but I think it would be helpful to provide comparisons normalized as cents above conventional energy prices.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create an Account!
  • Sign-In
John Farrell

John Farrell

John Farrell directs the Energy Self-Reliant States and Communities program at ILSR and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits of local ownership and dispersed generation of renewable energy. His latest paper,...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Create a free account and start adding your blogs.

Create an Account

Most Commented

  • 8
    Country-Based Action to Achieve Universal Access to Energy
  • 4
    California Energy Storage Plan May Require $3 Billion Investment
  • 2
    Is the IRS Considering Solar REITs?
  • 2
    Integrated Distribution Planning: A Path to Sustaining Growth

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Upsolar
  • Sunetric
  • Leybold Optics
  • Richardson RFPD, Inc.
  • Black & Veatch Corporation
  • Able Energy Co.
  • Rich Hessler Business Development
  • ASME - American Society of Mechanical Engineers
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hydro Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information